RSS Feed
July 5th, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
He said: “Our strong preference is to work with Russia China but
if Annan plan fails no option is ruled out.
“We’re working with them. We support stronger action by Friends of Syria.
If no progress made will seek strong UNSCR.”
Asked by a number of Tweeters why Britain did not seek a military resolution
to the conflict in order to stop the bloodshed, he disclosed that while his
preference was for diplomatic measures, an armed force had not been ruled
out.
Mr Hague said: “Sustainable UN presence requires cessation of violence. No
option is ruled out. But military intervention wld [sic] require
international agreement and very large scale force.”
One Twitter user, Viresh Joshi, asked: “How many more massacres will it take
until the global community realises that the Annan Peace Plan hasn’t worked?”
Mr Hague responded: “Hasn’t worked so far but best way of avoiding more
massacres is to do everything we can to support peaceful transition.”
A new UN Resolution would likely be similar to the Chapter 7 resolution which
was used to remove Gaddafi.
In the first place it would rule out military action, and instead threaten
the: “complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail,
sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio and other means of communication.”
However, Mr Hague’s words in the Twitter chat make clear that Britain would be
prepare to move on to an armed force as a last resort.
He was responding to Tweeters including one called “Noor,” who said: “The
struggle has been going on for 16 months, when will the international
community deem it necessary to intervene?”
Tweeter Khalil Agha asked: “How longer would u wait for Russia and China to
support any fair solution in Syria. Average of killed civilians raised to 80
daily.”
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
