Will The American Be Recognizable in 2016?… The Cost Of Obama Style Eugenics

obamacare-this-is-what-i-think

I was discussing the
Obama birth control mandate with a friend who is less “political” than
me and posed the question of why Obama would mandate free birth control to please the
Feminist left? My friend responded immediately that Obama already has
the support of the Feminist left, so that can’t be the reason. ~ Gina Loudon

We
speculated about deals with Big Pharma, or Planned Parenthood. It is
hard to imagine a rational, national public interest, in the creation of
a “free birth control culture”. We know Obama is politically shrewd.

If
pandering isn’t his rationale, the motive of this birth control
entitlement, when coupled with other policies, begins to appear
sinister.

Seniors
– During the Obamacare debate, when Pelosi was telling us to pass the
bill in order to learn what was in it, both sides argued about whether
Obamacare included rationing.

Sarah Palin labeled the rationing boards
“death panels”. We now know that Palin was right. Rationing treatment to
patients by “review panels” is absolutely part of this bill.

Seniors
will dread the words “comfort care” which will convey that the country
you built has decided you are carved out of protection, and you will be
left to die.

Babies
– The radical left has long favored population control, as has every
totalitarian regime throughout history.

While death panels in Obamacare
will purportedly exist to save money, the birth control mandate carries
costs into the billions of dollars. Sticking the mandate on insurance
does not mean the cost will magically vaporize.

Worse, what can we
expect when the next generation learns that sex without pregnancy is a
government entitlement? How will a rationed healthcare system handle the
STD pandemic?

This sends the message, “Sorry Grandma, since your
grandchildren need treatment for syphilis, you are getting “comfort
care.’”

Down Syndrome Eliminated
– So much attention has been focused on the birth control entitlement,
many of us missed the latest in Obama eugenics: A Down Syndrome free
USA.

This administration is sending you the bill for the $1000 +
prenatal test to find where all the babies with Down Syndrome are hiding
and target them for elimination from the gene pool.

As an adoptive
parent of a beautiful child with Down syndrome, I take special offense
at this Mengelean expenditure.

Mark Leach, an attorney and fellow parent of a child with Down syndrome put pen to paper on this one:

Fiscally, public
funding of prenatal testing for DS just does not make sense. There are
an estimated 2.4+ million pregnancies each year eligible for
Medicaid-funded prenatal care.

Down syndrome has a birth rate of 1 in
691 pregnancies, with an estimated incident rate, i.e. the number of
pregnancies carrying a child with DS, being equal to that.

This means
that of those 2.4 million pregnancies, only about seven thousand
actually are pregnant with a child with DS.

Yet, current medical
recommendations are to offer both screening and diagnostic prenatal
testing to all pregnant mothers.

Therefore, the millions of pregnancies
not carrying a child with DS may nonetheless accept the testing and
thereby incur the cost to the Medicaid system.

Current diagnostic
testing costs over $1,000. That results in a possible exposure of $2.4
billion to the Medicaid system. All for just 7,000 pregnancies actually
carrying a child with DS.

Let me spell this
out. Over 90% of babies with Down syndrome are aborted already.
Columnist George Will has labeled the aggressive screening a “search and
destroy mission”.

The Obama administration has targeted the Down
syndrome babies of the poor for elimination, obligating taxpayers to a
$2.4 billion liability. Presumably the entitlement means now we will pay
for their abortions as well.

How long before the Obama administration
mandates insurance pay for screening for the entire population and their
abortions?

When Obama went
looking for a Director of Health and Human Services, he chose a Governor
with zero background in health care. That is not entirely unusual. What
is unusual is that he picked the Governor with the hands down, number
one, top credential in her support of abortion.

Sebelius provided a safe
haven to an abortionist who was the subject of numerous investigations,
including the fact that he was a top cash donor to her campaigns.
Together, Sebelius and George Tiller made Wichita, Kansas the abortion
capital of the nation, a title of dishonor and outrage to many.

He
earned the title “Tiller the Killer” by his willingness to flaunt late
term abortion laws and perform any abortion on any girl, as long as the
check cleared. This President put Sebelius in charge of health, when her
greatest distinction is her experience with death.

The hallmark of the
United States is individual liberty, not collective liberty or liberty
for the sovereign.

While the Democrat party of yesteryear ostensibly
stood for the rights of the little guy, this new Democrat Party is
systematically defining people groups out of the scope of government
protection, and committing billions of dollars to do so.

They are poised
to create a brave new world–a world free of people with Down syndrome,
the elderly, the infirmed, the inconvenient, and anyone else the panels
choose to eliminate from the system.

Most people recognize that Obama has a good shot at winning re-election in 2012.

Will the American be recognizable in 2016?

 

Gina Loudon – June 3, 2012 – NoOneHasToDieTomorrow

 

diggmutidel.icio.usgoogleredditfacebook

Views: 0

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes