Who is the Man Shooting Blanks in the Tel Aviv Shooting Hoax?
What will the Zionists do now? They have proven themselves as the worst possible hoax generators conceivable. Does not the world remember their fraud on 911 when they accused various Muslim people, having their pictures put all over the world as poster children? Then, it was discovered how poorly the Mossad did with their list, how these criminal minds got it so very wrong, using the names and passports of actual living Muslims who came forward to defend themselves.
Bin Laden, who was also wrongly accused, also came forward saying he had nothing to do with it and that, instead, the world should look at the real criminals behind this: the West’s secret government-run by the Jews.
As it turned out this was entirely correct, with arch-Zionist elements such as the Rockefeller and Rothschild cabals, along with their subsidiaries, Silverstein, Zakheim, Perle, Podhoretz, Feith, Abrams, Shulsky, Blitzer, Cohen, Hauer, Armitage, Bergner, Netanyahu, Olmert, Barak, Dobriansky, and Donnelly, among others, taking the lead. Rabid extremists all, they plotted and then perpetrated the WTC bombings, also plotting to divert the world by blaming it on Islamic people.
How could it be expected to be different in the Tel Aviv bar shooting hoax? How could anything that the Zionists claim, even with supportive imagery, be claimed as real upon realizing their track history? These scam artists have failed miserably again, fooling no one other than the Sheeple-oriented, vulnerable, gullible goy.
Even so, who is the shooter? Is it really the man as advertised, Mr. Nashat Milhem?
Supposedly, he made an “anonymous” call to his father to ask him if the father’s gun, a security guard, was still in his house. Who believes such nonsense? Regardless, the father is obviously a government mole:
“When I heard what happened I felt personally responsible, I headed to the police station and I helped out with every matter of security.”
The father told police that he received an anonymous phone call from someone who told him to check if his licensed firearm, which he uses as a guard in a security firm, was in possession at his home. He checked and found his firearm but then realized that it may have been his son, the suspected shooter, who made the anonymous call.
No one can find this plausible in the least. Even so, they claim to be Muslims. Yet, how is this evidence of anything? No one can say what they are for certain, other than collaborators with the Tel Aviv hierarchy.
Yet is it the same person as seen in the prior photograph from 2007? Notice the psyops visor glasses. There is some similarity in the crew haircut, yet it is hard to say. Regardless, if involved directly in the firing of the gun, it is irrelevant. These were blanks, not real bullets.
Furthermore, the evidence for staging is exceedingly obvious. There can be no way this was a real shooting. See the staging, here, with the placement of the cartridge:
Now, supposedly, he had a Qur’aan in his backpack. Sure he did, right, just like on 9-11. Moreover, he conveniently left it so the Israelis could find it, ‘to send a message.’ This is a standard Zionist scheme. The leaving in the car or backpack claim for the Qur’aan is always proof of an arch-Zionist Islamophobic plot.
This type of hoaxing has already been shown previously, as in the Charlie Hebdo hoax. Take a Mossad mole, dress him up like a terrorist, that is in black, then, have such a one shoot a weapon armed with blanks. It looks real enough. Most people will be fooled.
Do it with imagery and story-lines. Tell plenty of stories. Fake it all the way. For instance, knock a few chairs over, those that were not dumped over in the live video, then, put a woman in a stocking cap. Then, have her holding a puppy, right before the cameras. People will get the message. They may even start donating their hard-earned money:
You mean the crime scene isn’t secured? Of course it’s not. That’s because there was no crime scene to any degree.
It matters not who are the participants. Zionist elements have a multitude of assets to instigate such scams. Yet, a full fledged scam it is, proven by the litany of crisis actors, fake wounded, fake shooters, and phony evidence clearly set-up for effect.
This is a staged hoax. Who in this universe can prove otherwise?
Source Article from http://nodisinfo.com/52396-2/
Related posts:
Views: 0