What About the Unprovoked U.S. Aggression Against Iraq?

January 26th, 2023

Awake Goy

Madeleine Albright / “60 Minutes” 500,000 dead Iraqi children “worth it”! Clinton’s sanctions

War Criminals

Clinton on Qaddafi: We came, we saw, he died

Serial Child Raper Papa CIA BadBush’s war against Iraq.
Saddam who was the CIA’s boy, asked permission from US State department to invade Kuwait and was told what Arab States did between them in the Middle East was not any of US’s business.

As soon as he invaded the Child Raper BadBush started screaming like a gang raped vestal virgin.

After Saddam had ordered the end of fighting and his soldiers were going back to Iraq, BadBush had US war planes slaughter thousands of Iraq soldiers who were not fighting any more.

It was called the Highway of Death.
BadBush only stoped the holocaust when world opinion forced him to.

Every country the US has illegally invaded and made war on in the last 20 years, did not first attack America and all the millions of civilians holocausted by the USA in these illegal wars were based on the False Flag Lie of “Arabs” doing 9-11 when it was Israel and the USA which did 9-11.

If a new Nuremberg Tribunal is convened for USA war Criminals, it will take a whole prison camp to hold them and there will be tens of thousands of trials and tens of thousands of hangings.

USA trying as war criminals German military officers and politicians for “war crimes” which the USA’s war crimes of the last 20 years make look like child’s play.

USA hanging German military officers and politicians for “war crimes” which the last 20 years of USA’s war crimes make look like bumbling child’s play.

Turn about is fair play.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Let the Germans run the Nuremberg War Crime Trials in which US military officers, politicians and “journalist” are tried and hanged.

The Ole Dog!

Referring to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, an editorial in Saturday’s Washington Post exclaims that Ukraine’s “struggle is also a crucible for Europe and an assault against the most basic precept on which the Western system rests: the impermissibility of unprovoked wars of aggression.”

In a follow-up editorial today, the Post calls for an international tribunal to try Vladimir Putin and his “henchmen” for waging a “war of aggression” against Ukraine. The Post quotes the Nuremberg tribunal: “To initiate a war of aggression … is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

What befuddles me, however, is why the Post doesn’t also condemn President George W. Bush and his “henchmen” for their unprovoked invasion of Iraq and, further, why the Post doesn’t call for a Nuremberg-type tribunal for Bush and his “henchman.” After all, there is no statute of limitations on war crimes of this nature. Is it only Russia, Germany, and other nations that are to be condemned and put on trial for unprovoked wars of aggression? Why should U.S. officials be exempt from the Nuremberg principle?

It is an undisputed fact that Iraq never attacked the United States. The United States was the aggressor in this conflict from the start. Bush and his henchmen were upset that his father, President George H.W. Bush, had not ousted Saddam Hussein from power in the Persian Gulf War. They were intent on correcting what they considered was a grave mistake on the part of the elder Bush.

To justify their unprovoked invasion of Iraq, Bush and his henchman made up a lie about Saddam’s supposed weapons of mass destruction. After all, when their lie was made manifest by the non-discovery of those WMDs, it is undisputed that Bush did not apologize for his “mistake” and immediately order a withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. Instead, Bush ordered his army to remain in Iraq and to kill whomever objected to the new regime that he and his henchmen had installed into power.

But even if Bush’s WMD claim had not been a lie, the fact that a nation-state has weapons of mass destruction does not legally or morally justify a war of aggression against that nation-state. Moreover, only the United Nations, not the U.S. government, has the authority to enforce its own WMD resolutions, and it is undisputed that the UN chose not to authorize an invasion and war of aggression against Iraq.

It’s not just Bush the son who was upset over the failure of Bush the father to effect regime change in the Persian Gulf War. Throughout his term in office during the 1990s, President Bill Clinton waged war against the Iraqi people by enforcing one of the most brutal systems of sanctions in history, which contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi children.