Victoria Police admits to using unlawful retrospective law in ‘lock up’ fines

July 16th, 2022

Awake Goy

Cowardly attack by Victoria Police on female pensioner.

The Victorian Government, police and the courts are involved in an intricate web of deceit against persons who have been fined under the Chief Health Officer’s ‘directions’.

In an embarrassing situation for police, in a ‘court of public record’ Victoria Police admitted that the organisation is using unlawfully passed legislation that ‘fixed’ the problem, where the Victorian Parliament enacted retrospective legislation where Victoria Police officers had no lawful authority to issue health related fines based on directions given by the CHO.

Whether it’s a ‘stay at home’ order akin to Martial Law, an order against a public gathering or travelling outside of a Nazi like fictitious boundary, they’re all unlawful orders with regards to the ‘general population’.

Briefly,

First and foremost police acting under the ‘direction’ of the CHO, is an action acting under dictation which is forbidden at law.

Victorian legislation must be compatible with Human Rights, where it also must abide by the rules set out according to the SARC (Scrutiny of Act and Regulations Committee).

See article: https://corpau.blogspot.com/2015/08/sarc-scruitny-of-acts-and-regulations.html

The Chief Health Officer at the time Brett Sutton, is part of the Executive branch of government, the lowest part of the legal system, where his so called directions are ‘public policy’ meaning the directions are only binding on the public service, that being not binding on the police nor the judiciary.

Victoria Police have been caught out fabricating false charges, for example against Marty Focker.

See hidden video:

The businesses known as Courts are part of this conspiracy, where your human rights are abused by the judiciary, but you have to catch them out, call it and take further action.

What’s more concerning is that the Courts are not acting independently, free from bias, as they are acting in the best interest for the stakeholders in order to achieve successful outcomes critical to the “success” of MCV (Magistrates’ Court of Victoria ) and other Victorian government departments.

See document: