Vaccinating Children Without Parental Knowledge Or Consent Soon To Become The Norm Across The World

 

vaccinations-school

Health officials in the U.S, U.K, Canada, Australia and around the
world are officially crossing into dangerous territory with parents
when it comes to vaccinations. Not only are public health entities
habitually and deliberately failing to inform the public of their right
to refuse vaccines in both school and work settings, but they are
working towards mandatory vaccination protocols which will allow
officials to conduct childhood vaccinations without any parental consent
at all.

It was just a little over one year ago when the
pharmaceutical industry, the Department of Health and Human Services,
and Centers for Disease Control allocated millions of dollars in
funding to establish vaccine clinics in public schools, causing a huge uproar from concerned parents.

The RAND Corporation, paid by Sanofi Pasteur, outlined how to turn schools into vaccine clinics, which critics claimed will inevitably poison children with multi-dose vaccines.

These school based health centers (SBHCs) are
located in school settings that claim to provide
children and adolescents with comprehensive primary,
acute, and preventive care for physical and mental health conditions.
The following report Are We ‘Making the Grade’ With Our Children is a concise overview of school based vaccination centers and their objectives.

SBHCs are becoming a matter of routine in other countries such as Australia,
where the focus has been to implement the same HPV vaccination programs.
Queensland Health has so far finalised arrangements with approximately
almost 800 schools to offer the HPV vaccine to students.

Naturopathic Doctor and vaccine researcher, Dave
Mihalovic stated that public health agencies are
pushing the centers in the guise of preventive
medicine, when they will effectively promote the
opposite. “The centers are providing an entry portal for
pharmaceutical giants to access student health records and provide
dangerous treatments such as untested drugs and vaccines
without the full informed consent of parents.”

Consent packets are sent home by the school, completed by a
parent/guardian, and then returned to the school.
Vaccines are provided during the school day by nursing
staff. Parents are not required to be present.

The consent forms are a one-time process, meaning parents will
not have to submit consent more than once regardless how many
vaccines their child receives. “This leaves the door
open for the injection or administration of any drug
treatment to the child which the school’s health staff
deems appropriate, without any informed consent by
the parents on the treatment’s effects,
contraindications or consequences,” said Mihalovic.

“It’s certainly an incredibly advantageous
position for big pharma,” said Mihalovic. The decisions
will ultimately be between parents and the respective
policy makers of school system, however the
responsibility to make the right decision will lie solely with
the parents. “Any parent who would not sound the alarm at a
policy that does not inform them of every single injection,
drug or treatment to their child is simply not paying
attention to the potential consequences,” concluded
Mihalovic.

Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry
recently came under fire from the public and his opposition for an executive order mandating the HPV vaccine as a requirement for young girls without their informed consent or that of their parents.

One of the most concerning issues relating to
Perry’s executive order is that HPV has been repeatedly shown not to
cause cervical cancer, and that it is the persistant infection, not the
virus, that determines the risk. More than 90% of women initially
infected with a particular strain of HPV will not show the same strain
four menstrual cycles later making the vaccine useless. Another
astonishing fact, as shown by a CDC study, is that HPV types 16 and 18,
the two HPV vaccine-relevant strains, are NOT the prevalent types
in American women. Three published papers on HPV prevalence in the U.S.,
indicated that types 62, 84 and 52 are the most prevalent. None of
these are targeted in either approved HPV vaccine, and type 52 is an
accepted high-risk “carcinogenic” strain of HPV.

SANE Vax, Inc. recently informed the FDA
that the Gardasil HPV vaccine currently on the market has been found
to be contaminated with residual recombinant HPV DNA. This hitherto
unknown contaminant may have provided a scientific basis for
Gardasil-induced autoimmune-based inflammatory diseases in various
tissues, including inflammation in the joints and central nervous
system.

SANE Vax contracted with an independent lab to
test for contamination and found HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) in 13
vaccine vials. The Gardasil vials with different lot numbers were from
New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the
U.S. 100% of the samples tested positive for the presence of the
genetically modified HPV DNA.

The state of California recently passed bill AB499,
permitting minors as young as 12 years old to be vaccinated with
vaccines such as Gardasil without parental knowledge or parental
consent.
The worst part is that parents will still be
legally and financially responsible for their child even if severe
damage results from the secret vaccinations without parental consent.

The overbearing reach of public health officials extends far beyond the United States. As vaccine examiner noted
last year, a ‘demonstration project’ conducted by PATH International
in cooperation with ICMR and the Indian state governments and
funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was called to an
abrupt halt amidst allegations of unethical conduct.

58 various health advocacy groups took it upon themselves to conduct
an independent fact finding mission when reports of 4 unexplained
deaths and 120 girls suffering from debilitating new illnesses after
being vaccinated against the HPV virus.

In Canada, health officials routinely ignore the fact that there
are no laws that can force a person to be vaccinated against their
will. Parents are often pressured to vaccinate their young infants with
the threat that the child won’t be allowed in school–even though most
provinces don’t have acts legislating compulsory vaccination.

In the three provinces (Ontario, New Brunswick and Manitoba) that have
legislation for school-entry vaccinations, parents are rarely told
that exemptions for reasons of conscience and/or religion exist within
these laws to allow their children to opt out of having any shots.

Although there is no specific law in
British Columbia that governs vaccination for school entry, the
Infant’s Act gives health officials a veritable carte blanche to
perform medical procedures on children without parental knowledge and
consent. The Vaccine Risk Awareness Network
(VRAN) has been contacted on several occasions by parents whose
children were hauled in by school nurses and vaccinated against their
will despite the child’s protest that they were not to get any vaccines.

In Burnaby, BC, parents have been infuriated by
the lack of parental consent obtained by health authorities. A Burnaby mom
was one of those parents upset that her 13-year-old daughter was
vaccinated for HPV without her parental consent. “She didn’t bring home
any forms or anything,” said Rosemary Reid. “I had absolutely no idea.”

The BC based Fraser Health Authority states they
try to get parental consent, and if the girls don’t bring the forms
back, it’s up to a public health nurse to decide if they are mature
enough to give informed consent. “This informed consent thing, I don’t
think I agree with it. I think it should still be up to the parents.
You can take some kids into a room and brainwash them,” she said.
“They’re only 13 and 14.” Fraser Health spokesperson Lisa Thibault said
kids can overrule parental objection if they’re deemed mature enough
by a public health nurse, and it’s the nurse’s responsibility to make
that assessment.

At issue, of course, is whether 12-, 13- or 14-year-olds are mature enough to fully analyze the benefits versus risks of vaccination (or any medical treatment for that matter), or recognize the alternatives.

On a broader level, the vaccine situation involving nursing students,
students in teachers’ college, dental tech students, health care workers
and workers in nursing homes is fairly grim. These people are often
threatened with expulsion and job loss if they refuse to submit to
hepatitis B, tuberculosis tests or flu shots.

Health workers who refused the flu shots have
been laid-off their nursing home jobs without pay when cases of flu
have broken out. Those who do agree to get the flu shot are required
to sign a waiver that absolves the institution, the union and the
pharmaceutical company from any liability for damages should health
injury or disabilities occur from vaccine reactions.

In the U.K,
nurses regularly disregard the wishes of parents
relating to the health and welfare of their children.
U.K department of health does not deny that parental consent is
desirable but not essential. Family rights campaigners called for a
change in the law one year ago after it was revealed that girls as
young as 12 can be given the cervical cancer vaccine without their
parents’ consent.
Doctors and nurses have been told they are under no legal obligation to
seek the permission of the parent or guardian.

Norman Wells, director of Family and Youth Concern, said: ‘Giving the
vaccination to girls without the consent of their parents is unethical
and a recipe for disaster. “It is sending out the message that girls
under 16 have a right to a private sex life and is treating parents with
contempt.”

U.K Doctors have reported that girls aged just 12 and 13 have suffered paralysis, convulsions and sight problems after being given the HPV vaccine.

Family doctors in the U.K have even been accused of administering the MMR jab by stealth to children
coming into their surgeries to receive other vaccinations. At least 50
horrified parents have complained that their GPs have ‘mistakenly’
given their children the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine,
it has emerged.

Studies sponsored by pharmaceutical giants continue to embark on several qualitative and quantitative research projects
to show biased results on how to assess the competency of consent from children for vaccinations. BMC Public Health published a study
in 2009 which claimed to demonstrate that health providers have a duty
of care to girls for whom no parental consent for HPV vaccination has
been given, and in the UK, this includes conducting, and acting upon,
an assessment of the maturity and competence of an adolescent minor.

The British Journal of Cancer published a clinical study on HPV vaccination among ethnic minorities in the UK: knowledge, acceptability and attitudes,
to assess what they refer to as unique opportunities for the “primary
prevention” of cervical cancer. The background statement alone was
erroneous and false before the study was even initiated. Vaccination has
never been proven on any scientific grounds to be a primary prevention
tool for cervical cancer.

Regardless, the quantitative study
assessed ethnic differences in knowledge and acceptability of HPV
vaccination in the UK to attempt to validate informed consent and
refusal of HPV vaccination in ethnic communities.

The study further demonstrates how desperate vaccine manufacturers have
become to obtain public acceptance for bypassing informed consent. The
need to initiate a study to derive data on the differentiation between
ethnicity, religion and other factors to define acceptability of
informed consent is not only immoral, but also shows a complete
disregard for what consent represents as a human right.

The right to “informed consent” when considering any medical
procedure or drug, is a fundamental human right and a key medical ethic
that governs medical law in almost every country in the world. This
ethic has grown from the Nuremberg trials after World War II. It
forbids human experimentation and the use of force or intimidation in
medical procedures.

The institutions that are using these strong-arm tactics are in
violation of fundamental medical ethics and must be challenged
forcefully if we are to preserve what remains of health freedom for
humanity. The unions who have conspired with the various institutions to
enforce vaccination must also be called to task for failing to
protect children and workers’ rights from medical coercion and battery.

At the pinnacle of defending our health freedoms, we need to muster
strength in numbers as the majority to secure amendments that will
guarantee freedom of choice in health, and protection from enforced
medication at all costs.

 

September 28, 2011 – reposted February 17, 2012 – Prevent Disease


Sources:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
canada.com
dailymail.co.uk
sanevax.org
alive.com
nature.com
huffingtonpost.com

 

diggmutidel.icio.usgoogleredditfacebook

Views: 0

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

3 Responses to “Vaccinating Children Without Parental Knowledge Or Consent Soon To Become The Norm Across The World”

  1. Mindano Iha says:

    Informed consent implies that necessary and relevant information exists and is accessible.

    Necessary and relevant information does in fact not exist for vaccines. Informed consent is therefore a contradiction in terms. It is impossible to attain.

    We investigated one vaccine, Gardasil, and conclude that the manufacturer Merck, health authorities, doctors and other promoters know so little about this vaccine that it should never have been approved.

    The same may well apply to other vaccines.

    Who wants to buy a car from a pushy salesman who knows very little about cars?

    Here is a list with 27 relevant and important facts which the promoters are unable to answer. The list is not even complete.

    http://vactruth.com/2011/11/04/27-dirty-little-vaccine-secrets/

  2. Mother of 4 says:

    :dance: Parents must give permission.
    Period.
    Do the nurses want to look after the children who have reactions?

  3. steve says:

    How much are the govt and schools being paid to do this. No one but the parent has the right to make decisions for their child when they have all the facts not lies and bullying. Vaccines are not proven and having seen my great aunt spend an entire life caring for her daughter who was damaged by vaccine I would never do it to my child. These greedy pharmaceuticals need to be brought to task and their power base reduced. Have they learnt nothing from the horrors of the 2 world wars. I thought our forefathers fought for us to be free but instead we are again being enslaved and bullied all without a shot being fired.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes