But does it add up?
First, some facts. China is America’s banker – it owns more US debt than any
other nation. It is also America’s largest trading partner – a vast market
for exports as well as the source of myriad imports.
Despite this mutual economic inter-dependence, there is an inherent uneasiness
with the Market-Leninist state among American voters, especially in the
Midwest. This had been the heart of American manufacturing in the mid-20th
century, before a combination of union costs and globalisation drove many of
these jobs overseas in a flurry of outsourcing. Resentment festered, along
with the economic anxiety.
And so China has become a potent political football in recent years. Romney
has promised to punish it as a currency manipulator on day one of his
administration, something that his one-time Republican rival Jon Huntsman –
a former ambassador to China – has warned would start a trade war.
In the Tea Party-fuelled campaign of 2010, the airwaves of Ohio were full of
ads using Red China as a symbol of the costs of out-of-control debt and
American decline.
But two years later, the uneasy American economic recovery is not unrelated to
trade with China. Exhibit A in the Obama administration’s argument for
re-election is a revived General Motors, which was bailed out by the
government over the objections of Romney, among others.
And this year, GM has sold a record 1.2 million cars in China – more than in
the US. In fact, China is the state of Ohio’s third largest export market,
totalling $2.7 billion, including half a billion dollars worth of machinery.
When I asked the mayor of Toledo, Michael Bell, how populist appeals against
China resonate in his swing-state city, he laughed and explained that he’d
been to China there three times since taking office. He credits the bailout
of the car industry (Toledo has thriving GM and Chrysler plants) as well as
trade with China as being key to his success at turning the city’s deficit
into a surplus. Mayor Bell sees free trade, albeit with fair rules, as the
key to sustained recovery.
No president since Kennedy has been elected without winning Ohio. A 60,000
vote switch from George W Bush to John Kerry here – roughly the hometown
crowd for a University of Ohio football game – would have led to a different
president being elected in 2004.
So the stakes are high. And while Obama won Ohio in 2008 – and currently leads
by half a dozen points – this is ground zero for the white working-class
swing voters once known as Reagan Democrats, who Romney hopes to win over.
The Obama campaign’s strategy is to make Romney a symbol of outsourcing, which
they say his company, Bain Capital, pioneered during the 1980s.
Team Romney, in turn, hopes to paint President Obama as an elite, weak, and
out of touch leader who has tried and failed to turnaround the American
economy.
The president’s hope is that the economic recovery in Ohio – which is
outpacing the rest of the nation – will give him credibility beyond
car-making and union households. The Midwest is the perfect place for the
president to present himself as Democratic defender of the squeezed middle
class.
Beyond the me-too populist push-back against China, the Obama administration
hopes that the president’s unusual strength on foreign policy will help him
fight off Republican attacks.
The struggling rust belt will be the ultimate test of Obama’s best
bumper-sticker argument for re-election: “Killed Bin Laden, Saved G.M.”
John Avlon is senior columnist for Newsweek and The Daily Beast
Views: 0