Jew World Order

October 4, 2017

The bill is facing opposition from groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation who claim the bill will “dramatically expand dragnet biometric and other surveillance of U.S. citizens and immigrants alike at and near the U.S. border.” Regarding the use of drones and ALPRs, the EFF says, “it is unclear whether the bill’s new ALPR surveillance would be limited to cars that actually cross the U.S. border, or would also apply more broadly to cars at CBP’s many interior checkpoints, some located as far as 100 miles from the border.”

The bill is supported by the Security Industry Association (SIA), The International Biometrics + Identity Association, and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. The SIA sent a letter to the House Homeland Security Committee expressing their support for the measure.

“Implementation of H.R. 3548 could result in significant expansion of U.S. border protections by physical barriers as appropriate in high-risk areas as part of this border security infrastructure,” SIA CEO Don Erickson said. “Physical barriers are not effective deterrents without the ability of U.S. border patrol agents to detect breaches and breach attempts. Therefore, the use of modern integrated surveillance technology and analytics used in perimeter security will be just as essential to success as a barrier’s structural design.”

It should come as no surprise that these organizations are in favor of the bill – they stand to profit from the project. What the supporters of this bill are not addressing is the fact that it will further the development of a surveillance state and militarized police state along the U.S. Mexico border. This border is already a dangerous place to be because of the so-called “Constitution Free Zones”  where the federal government sets up illegal checkpoints and harasses travelers.

Activist Post previously reported that the Trump administration is using Stingray cell phone surveillance tools to monitor undocumented migrants. When combined with recent plans to scan the face of every person coming in and out of the United States, the growing “biometric wall”, and DHS policy of scanning social media of all immigrants, and a picture of complete and total surveillance comes into view.

One final reason this bill and the building of a border wall would be a disaster deals with the concept of “eminent domain.” Essentially, when the state wants to implement a new project – a border wall, perhaps – but there are homes or businesses in the path of the project, they simply pay the people off and take their land. (Sometimes they don’t even bother paying.) The Border Security for America Act calls on the Secretary of Homeland Security to take all necessary actions to build the wall, including “the removal of obstacles to detection of illegal entrants.” So if your home or business gets in the way of the federal governments project you will lose it.

No matter which way you look at it, the border wall is a horrible idea. It will increase surveillance and militarization along the border. More than likely the wall will be used to kept Americans in the growing police state known as the United States. Do not fall prey to arguments for border security. Do not allow the tyrants to trick you into accepting a loss of privacy and freedom.

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1 and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2

Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact [email protected]

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.