“Three Black Teenagers”: Uproar over Facts

The current controlled media “uproar” over the Google image “three black teenagers” search result seeks to hide the fact that blacks commit—and are prosecuted and imprisoned—at rates far higher than whites.

The Google image search “uproar” was started this week when black Twitter user Kabir Alli posted a video showing the difference in results of two searches for “black” and “white” teenagers.

YOOOOOO LOOK AT THIS pic.twitter.com/uY1JysFm8w

— July 3rd. (@iBeKabir) June 7, 2016

The search for “three black teenagers” produced results which mainly showed arrest mugshots, while the search for “three white teenagers” mainly showed smiling and happy generic images of white teenagers.

The controlled media latched onto this Twitter video as supposed evidence of “racism in society”—namely that it was the fault of whites once again.

USA-Today-3bt

For example, USA Today ran the story, headlining it “Three black teenagers’ Google search sparks outrage,” saying that the search results raise “troubling questions about how racial bias in society and the media is reflected online.”

The UK’s Guardian newspaper carried the story headlined “The ‘three black teenagers’ search shows it is society, not Google, that is racist.”

Guardian-3bt

In reality, these claims of “white racism” are completely unfounded.

The Google results are merely the result of the scientific fact that blacks commit significantly more crime than whites.

The Google algorithms—unbiased mathematical formulae—simply reflect this fact.

As reported earlier, according to the official statistics provided by US law enforcement agencies, blacks are 27 times more likely to attack whites than vice versa, six times more likely than a nonblack to commit murder, and are 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting”—defined as firing a bullet that hits someone—a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.

If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent, and in an all-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

It is not therefore whites who are being “racist” when news image search results show black criminals—but only a reflection of the disproportionately high black crime rate.

This fact is however unacceptable to the establishment’s institutionally anti-white racism, and therefore the “uproar” over supposed racism.

In reality, the mathematical algorithms used by Google merely represent established fact. This reality has however not stopped Google from changing its algorithms when the logical answers do not suit the establishment’s narrative.

three-black-teenagers

The best previous example of this “unsuitability” of scientific results came when Google changed its results to the question “who runs Hollywood.”

The Google answer to this question was “Jews” with reference to a New Observer article which dealt with the fact that Jews boasted in books and newspaper articles that they owned Hollywood, but condemned as “anti-Semitic” anyone who dared repeat this Jewish boast.

After this fact was pointed out to Google, they “changed their algorithm” to make sure that no reference to the New Observer featured in answer to the question of who runs Hollywood—and, no doubt, they will also change the answer to the query of “three black teenagers.”