On the evening of Thursday, December 28th, family members and friends of Nariman, Ahed and Nour Tamimi gathered in the courtroom at Ofer military camp waiting to hear the latest verdict in regards to the three Tamimi women.
Ahed and Nour, were arrested by Israeli forces after a video of them slapping and pushing armed soldiers out of their yard was spread. Nariman Tamimi, Ahed’s mother, was arrested when she went to Binyamin police station to inquire about the well-being of her 16-year-old daughter, and to be present as her guardian since Ahed is a minor.
During Thursday’s court hearing Nour, 20, was brought into the courtroom in handcuffs, her small body surrounded by four prison guards. She wore a bright pink jacket, her face pale and her hair parted to the side. She blew kisses to her mother and father in the back of the courtroom and asked in whispers about her siblings. As her family tried to send her love and support, the prosecution laid out its demand to extend her detention for five more days. The prosecution later asked that the Nariman’s detention be extended for six more days, and Ahed’s for seven.
As of yet, no official charges have been brought for the Tamimi women. Nariman is suspected of “aggravated assault of a soldier, incitement and obstructing a soldier” as well as partaking in “public disturbance.” Similarily, Ahed Tamimi is also being held under the pretext of “assault” and “insulting” soldiers. Nawal Tamimi, who is Ahed’s aunt, told Mondoweiss, “in the end, this is an occupation. If they could they would officially charge us with the crime of being born Palestinian.”
Nour’s mother, Boshra Tamimi, tried to hold herself together as her daughter sat just a few meters away. Her palms held tightly in her lap, and her face clearly pained despite the smiles that kept erupting every time she caught Nour looking in her direction. After Nour and Nariman were escorted out of the room, Boshra lit a cigarette outside and tried to focus past the frustration. “This is a kangaroo trial” she said. When Ahed’s hearing was about to take place, Boshra made way back into the courtroom and sighed, “back to the madness.”
Ahed’s hearing was chaotic, and the proceedings were held in Hebrew as a translator echoed a poor interpretation of what was being discussed. At one point, the translator for the Tamimi’s seemed as though he was falling asleep in his chair, and in another moment he casually walked out mid-translation for a phone call.
When Ahed was brought into the court her father, Bassem, spoke to her of her siblings. He smiled and told her they were okay while her aunt kept telling her she loves her.
The prosecution began to build its case against Ahed as she tried to make sense of what was being said. She had enacted her right to remain silent throughout the interrogation. “[Israeli interrogators] had put her through a rough process, long hours of no food and in rooms with terrible conditions, but she expressed her right to silence” Bassem told Mondoweiss.
In the court, Ahed sat in a brown prison jacket that was twice her size. She smiled at her friends and family and mouthed “I’m okay” to them and checked in on her cousins, sending kisses and love to them through her aunt. “If a stranger were to hear about the way the prosecution is speaking about my daughter they’d think they were talking about some large being that’s some sort of frightening boogyman,” said Bassem after the first part of Ahed’s hearing.
Gaby Lasky, the Tamimi’s lawyer, reminded the court of “the right to resist the invasion of one’s home” and “right to object to occupation.” While the charges the prosecution is pushing against the Tamimis are assault, incitement, and violence, there is no mention of the soldier’s violence during the trial, nor the fact that they were on a land that is deemed occupied in international law. After the end of the hearing Bassem walked out with pessimism. “I think they [Nariman and Ahed] will be sentenced to their prisons,” he said.
While it seemed that Ahed and Nariman would be facing a harsh conviction at end of the court hearing, the judge agreed to the possibility of releasing Nour Tamimi on bail early next week, if the prosecution did not appeal. However, he affirmed that Ahed and Nariman must remain detained until the indictment process begins. Their next hearing will be on January 1st, 2018.
As the final part of Ahed’s hearing ended, the young girl was escorted out and her father was left with the fear that his teenage daughter may be facing jail time. Nawal fell into tears after loudly proclaiming to Ahed as she was being hauled out, “we love you, we are with you, stay strong my dear!”
Outside, the family gathered their belongings and made their way out of Ofer. In the car, Nawal and Boshra begin to ask about Nariman’s cousin, Manal Tamimi. Just hours before the trial Manal was also arrested by Israeli forces as she stood in support of prisoners outside Ofer’s gates.
“I think [Israel] is planning to open a special section for us Tamimi women,” Nawal joked. After updating others on the outcome of the hearing, the Tamimi family begins another set of phone calls to inquire about Manal. “She is going to Hasharon.”
“Our people, continue to be taken by the occupation in the name of justice,” Nawal sighs. They begin their journey back to their village of Nabi Saleh, and the homes that are missing the voices of their mothers and daughters.
Source Article from http://mondoweiss.net/2017/12/palestinian-report-hearing/
Related posts:
Views: 0
Promotion:
The Zionist Narrative: https://zionistnarrative.wordpress.com.
Below are Talmud excerpts as to what the rabbis teach and believe. Hard facts for a Jew who is married to a non-Jew.
I studied the Torah, Talmud, and the New Testaments for half a decade, including both the Hebrew and Greek languages. The following translations are accurate.
• “If a ‘goy’ (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed.” (Sanhedrin 58b)
• “If a Jew finds an object lost by a ‘goy’ it does not have to be returned.” (Baba Mezia 24a)
• “If a Jew murders a ‘goy’ there will be no death penalty.” (Sanhedrin 57a)
• “What a Jew steals from a ‘goy’ he may keep.” (Sanhedrin 57a)
• “Jews may use subterfuges to circumvent a ‘goy.’” (Baba Kamma 113a)
• “All children of the ‘goyim’ are animals.” (Yebamoth 98a)
• “Girls born of the ‘goyim’ are in a state of ‘niddah’ (menstrual uncleanness!) from birth.” (Abodah Zarah 36b)
• “The ‘goyim’ are not humans. They are beasts.” (Baba Mezia 114b)
• “If you eat with a ‘goy’ it is the same as eating with a dog.” (Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)
• “Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.” (Soferim 15)
• “Sexual intercourse between the ‘goyim’ is like intercourse between animals.” (Sanhedrin 74b)
• “When it comes to a Gentile in peace times, one may harm him indirectly.” “An example would include, removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice.” (Shulkan Arukh, Yoreh De ‘ah, 158, Hebrew Edition only)
• “Yashu’ (derogatory for Jesus) is in Hell being boiled in hot excrement.” (Gittin 57a) ’Yashu’ is an acronym for the Jewish curse, ‘May his (Jesus) name be wiped out forevermore.’
• “Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral.” (Sanhedrin 107b)
• “Miriam (Mary) had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)
• “She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a)
• “Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” (Rosh Hashanah 17a)
• Yebamoth 57b states, “A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation.”
• Yebamoth 60b states, “A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition.” Coition is sexual intercourse.
• Sanhedrin 55a states, “An adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is not a sexual act and cannot throw guilt upon her because the little boy is not truly a man.”
• Sanhedrin 76b states, “A blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. Failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, is as bad as one who returns a lost article to a Cuthean (a non-Jew), a deed for which the Lord will not spare him.”