RSS Feed
August 30th, 2015 
Awake Goy
The Zapruder Film Mystery
August 28th, 2015
Via: E2 Films:
One Response to “The Zapruder Film Mystery”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Source Article from http://www.cryptogon.com/?p=47163
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
mangrove Says:
August 28th, 2015 at 3:21 pm
Interesting, but I think Miles Mathis has figured out what really happened.
THE HIDDEN KING(S)
Camelot ruled from the cave of Merlin
http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf
If you watch all the films that day, you are left with the impression that we have a complete record of the motorcade through Dallas. You think you are able to positively identify the Kennedys at the beginning, you assume continuity, and so you assume the Kennedys are in the Zapruder film. But, as I have shown, we have NO evidence that the Kennedys are in the car in the Zapruder film. Lacking continuity, we only have what we can see, and what we can see is people who look like the Kennedys from a distance. We know that the Kennedys traveled with look-alikes, so this is proof of absolutely nothing. Given the evidence we have, it is possible (and, I would say, almost a surety) that Jack Kennedy is not in that car in Dealey Plaza.
Given this, it simply doesn’t matter if the films or photos were tampered with or faked. Even in
complete and perfect form, they don’t prove or even indicate anything. The only thing they indicate is that someone that looks like Kennedy got hit in the head by something. . . .
. . . We don’t have to prove it was or was not Kennedy or that it was or was not a bullet or that it was one shooter or twenty shooters. All these things are beyond proof or disproof, given the evidence we have. The bottom line is that we have no evidence—that would hold up in court—that Kennedy or anyone else was killed that day. In fact, that is precisely why Oswald had to appear to be killed. The government couldn’t risk taking him to trial and giving him an attorney. They not only had no evidence against him, they had no evidence that the President was dead. Any good attorney would have found the gigantic holes that I have just found, and any honest jury would have had to dismiss for lack of a body.
Given that, the correct question is not, “Where is Kennedy’s body?� or “Who killed Kennedy and
why?� The correct question is, “Why did Kennedy fake his own death?� The lack of a body, the cover up, the tampering with evidence, the incredible amount of inconsistency, the lies told on all sides by everyone, the misdirection and misinformation, the continued misdirection and misinformation after 44 years, all point to a death that was quite simply faked. Neither the standard theory nor the alternate theory fit the facts or the evidence. Both accept the assassination without any proof or requiring any
proof. Why? What kind of investigators accept a murder with no body? What kind of alternate investigators are “brave and honest� enough to propose that fake corpses were used, but never see that this means there is no real corpse? Why do alternate theorists rush to the initial conclusion—that Kennedy was assassinated—just as fast as the single-bullet people?