This is from one of our readers:
‘‘I have put a letter, presumably form a Dutch lawyer through Google translate. The letter was posted on Telegram.
The commentator of this letter is not a doctor, not a microbiologist, not a scientist and does not have a medical degree. Therefor do your own research and practice discretion.
As a non-lawyer I would add the following comment to the letter:
(You may want to skip my comments to the actual letter below, the letter is really good.)
In the history of humanity, there has not been a single virus that can spread through the population without the people displaying symptoms of a particular virus. Even the CDC admits that infection from a person, a man without symptoms is unlikely:
Analysis of Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic Transmission in SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak, Germany, 2020
“Conclusions
In this cluster of COVID-19 cases, little to no transmission occurred from asymptomatic case-patients. Presymptomatic transmission was more frequent than symptomatic transmission. The serial interval was short; very short intervals occurred.”
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/4/20-4576_article
Therefor the question I would add to the letter of the Lawyer is:
– Can you tell me how much evidence there is that would support the theory of infection by people without symptoms?
– What is the quality of that evidence?
– Is there a microbiologist, a virologist or any other kind of medical expert that can study the quality of evidence?
Facts like this might also be relevant:
Are you aware that the Dutch CDC (RIVM) admitted on june 25th 2020, that COVID-19 causes almost no disease with little to no ailments for 98 percent of the Dutch population (17,4 million people)?
Look for page 2, the disease pyramid and Google translate the words with the number ~98 %.
https://www.tweedekamer.nl/sites/default/files/atoms/files/technische_briefing_commissie_vws_25_juni_2020_jaap_van_dissel.pdf
The link above is from the website of the Tweede Kamer, the Dutch government.
Here is the actual letter from the Lawyer, enjoy!
IF YOUR BOSS THREATENS YOU TO FIRE IF YOU ARE NOT VACCINATED, DO NOT REFUSE:
The secret is NOT to refuse the jab and sign nothing!
From a lawyer:
If you are forced to vax to keep your job, here is a great way to tackle it. (Conditional acceptance)”
SAMPLE LETTER BELOW
🚨🚨🚨 The secret is NOT to refuse the Jabb….
From a lawyer:
If you are being forced to Vax in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it. (Conditional acceptance) The secret is NOT to refuse it.
“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.”:
1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?
2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?
3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?
4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?
5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy?
6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?
7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?
8. Can you please advise me if I were to experience any adverse reactions is the manufacturer of the vaccine liable? If the manufacturer isn’t liable will the company I’m currently employed with with be responsible & liable as it is their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment?
Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:
1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm.
2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.
The point is that if they CANNOT provide that information you’ve NOT got any obligation to vax.
https://www.coronafraud.com/2021/09/the-secret-is-not-to-refuse-jab.html
To his comment above he added:
”Regarding the letter of the Dutch lawyer I have sent about “conditional acceptance”, I must inform you that you have to take into account Legalese, the language of lawyers and judges.
Always consult a legal expert because an English word such as “understand” means something different in Legalese and a single word can screw up your rights.
I believe in an uncomprimized Common Law system, Legalese is not used. But I could be wrong.
I am afraid a lot of law in the USA is of a different type of jurisdiction with its own (semi) secret language Legaleze. Like I said, I am not a lawyer and my explanation might be inaccurate.”
Let us know more about it in the comments, thanks.
_______________________________
If you are looking for solutions (lawyer, form, gathering, action, antidote, maybe this could help you:
HERE
If you like our work please consider to donate :
Related posts:
Views: 0