The Red Flags of Amy Barrett

October 9th, 2020

Awake Goy

Every (((liberal))) media outlet praised Amy Coney Barrett in such exalted terms that leave no room for doubt, she is the perfect anti-RBG. So I focus on red flags exclusively in order to balance the perception.

Unfortunately her entire history in a concise comprehensive writing is not a matter of 5-seconds googling, and even if it was, do i have capacity to revisit all her cases, comprehend all the evidence, make my own verdict for each case and compare to hers? So I pathetically focus on the highlights already brought to us by the (((liberal))) media in their ridiculous attempt to prove that she is not on the (((liberal))) side of the barricades.

What have I learnt?

She is explicitly hostile to eugenics! (exclamation mark to express the degree of HER hostility)

there is a difference between ‘I don’t want a child’ and ‘I want a child, but only a male,’ or ‘I want only children whose genes predict success in life.’

Barrett herself

Weigh it carefully: she is a catholic through and through, prolifism is almost the meaning of her life, she stated more than once that for her a baby is a full blown legal human as soon as a sperm perforates an egg membrane (or was it the first nucleus division?) yet she offers to compromise on the very topic of “murdering babies” — I stress, for her it is a real murder, your and my perspectives are not relevant here — she is more against eugenics than she is against murder of perfectly innocent babies!

She is “OK” with you murdering your child, as long as this child is not severely deformed, or deadly ill — “OK, kill it, but don’t dare you killing a sick non-viable mutant for a benefit of a healthy boy”.

Using abortion to promote eugenic goals is morally and prudentially debatable

which translates: “fellow white people, you are not allowed to improve your race

Is she really pro child welfare, or simply trying to hold us back, negate all the benefits of prenatal diagnostics and such? Maybe she is only pro-life when this life is full of suffering? And her affinity with suffering manifests in her stance against assisted suicide, she wants every cancer patient to live every second of it! The second coming of Mother Theresa?

She adopted negro children, not a good role model, is she?

And then she lies everywhere profusely: “mother of 7” — NO! it is a lie. She is a mother of 5.
5 is not equal 7 and a supreme court judge must know this simple fact, in my universe.

Equally constantly and blatantly she lies about her religious beliefs and motivations and rulings:

I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law.

Call me a weirdo, but I believe it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. All outcomes of your thinking process are always subject to everything in your head. Simply because the brain is that effing interconnected. You can not order yourself: “i am not going to think about a white elephant” — if you are a catholic your rulings will be catholic, unless you are a fake catholic.

Her affiliation with People of Praise might seem a good sign at first, they preach subjugation of wahmen, yeah!!! But, BUT! they are COMMUNISTS!!!

Those early believers put their lives and their possessions in common, and “there were no needy persons among them.”

mission statement of People of Praise

In their own words they seek to reenact the Jamestown starvation 🙂 Also they are anti-racists: