The Parkus Team of Zionist Agents and the El Al Ticket Counter Shooting Hoax
The Zionists have made a major issue of the purported 2002 shooting at a LAX El Al ticket counter. They have done all that is possible to leverage this issue with every degree of publicity conceivable. There is great protestation by the Zionists in this regard. This alone raises suspicions of a plot.
This brings into play the star witness of the show, Dr. David Parkus. Associated was his then girlfriend, Pati Cure. along with his brother and sister-in-law, Paul and Milli Parker. The clique was absolutely the key element, acting as star witnesses but also as the main source of a most crucial element: photography.
It just so happened to be that some 30 feet from the ‘shooting’ there is an ER trauma surgeon, David Parker, a nurse practitioner, Pati Cure, and a professional, commercial photographer, Paul Parker. There all there, coincidentally, to act as good Samaritans and also to “document” the event, while acting as false witnesses.
The presence of this clique acts as proof that this El Al ticket counter event was a false flag attack and was by no means as advertised, which was an attack by an Islamic jihadist. What it really demonstrates is that the entire event was a Zionist plot.
Nevertheless, the Zionists protest too extensively to cause this to be considered real. Plus, they spread filthy lies. The stories vary immensely. Furthermore, Parker, the trauma surgeon, used the lie to advance his career, not in medicine but, rather, acting:
Parkus’ real passion is acting. He’s not every good at it.
He’s an actor and a trauma surgeon and was right there on-site. Plus, he is a Zionist Jew: how convenient.
He really wanted to win in the TNT reality show, Hero, but failed to do so:
Surely, Parkus, liar-in-chief, was proud of this role:
Yet, he did not prevail, partying despite the loss:
For Parkus the 2002 shooting counter hoax was just another act, a most diabolical one, though, as he through his lies targets innocents:
His matter-of-fact speech and contorted mouth and chin make him less than believable. Sure it was, it was that Muslim “terrorist” who was behind it all, targeting those poor, forlorn Jews. Regardless, he’s a filthy Zionist mole, and this arch-fraudster played a major role in establishing the basis of this hoax.
He tackled him, Mr. Hero audition hopeful, really? That’s not what he said before. In an interview quoted by Barry Chamish:
I ran to the scene and helped hold the shooter to the floor. I saw a knife fall from his body while he was still
resisting, then I felt him go limp.
There is a major difference between running at and tackling a person, a gunman no less, versus helping holding someone who is already restrained.
He was, therefore, already on the ground. How could he have tackled him? No one can do so to a man who is already partially restrained. He spread lies, which is indisputable.
Here, he tells yet another version:
Now, he merely grabbed “his leg.” Nevertheless, it is doubtful than anyone would be so bold, unless such a one was a security agent of a policeman. Yet, look at what is said – “When the gunman fell” it was then and then alone that Parkus went over to assist. What happened to tackling him mid-air?
In this version he claims the purported shooter essentially charged the counter: Dr David Parkus, a surgeon from Texas, said the heavily-built gunman marched towards the ticket counter and began firing from around 15 feet. “He started shooting in rapid succession, about five shots,” he said.
Here is yet another account, where he brings in his cohort, nurse practitioner Pati Cure:
Ms. Cure acted as a kind of PR agent for Parkus when he was attempting to win the role in Hero. Notice her protestation about anyone who might dispute the official story:
“Vote for Parkus as the winner of Hero – he was such a good hero in real life at the fake LAX shooting.”
Even so, one wonders just how a bullet could go upon entry from the buttocks through the chest under these circumstances. All accounts portray the gunman as shooting while standing up, pointing the gun towards the counter. Other accounts, though, place people on the ground in front of him, “hitting the floor.” Still, it would have been quite a trajectory for him to shoot someone lying on the stomach in the buttocks and then for the bullet to wind around and exit the chest. Yet, the main issue is that if this really did happen, there would be a major degree of blood loss with plenty of arterial splatter. That is non-existent at the supposed crime scene.
Here is yet another version:
DP: I was waiting in the Singapore Air line across from El Al when I
heard three or four shots. I turned around and saw a stocky man about eight
feet away from the El Al counter shoot at the counter. People hit the floor
and he was about the only one standing. A well-built El Al employee rushed
the shooter and fought with him over the gun. A couple of seconds later,
another El Al security man rushed the shooter and shot him in the flank.
He was wrestled to the ground… (which one is it, is it three or four shots at close range, or a shot in the flank?)
http://www.redmoonrising.com/chamish/Jul02.htm
…and another:
There’s a big difference between being tackled by the doctor himself and being wrestled to the ground by armed security. He said he was “there.” Can’t he keep his story straight?
There is also a big difference between directly confronting and armed man, disarming him, and watching weapons fall from the sky. In the majority of versions he never mentions disarming anyone, as per the DailyMail:
As the gunman collapsed, Parkus said he saw a long hunting knife fall to the floor….Versus the aforementioned statement of Parkus requiring, in fact, great bravery of helping security by kicking a blood-stained knife out of someone’s hands.
He was assisted in this fraud by his brother, the photographer:
His own brother disputes his claims of the tackling, saying it was the Israelis who did so.
Parkus is a professional photographer by trade:
It was he who uploaded the following photo to arch-Islamophobic Zionist-operated Websites such as BareNakedIslam:
For a man shot three or four times at close range by a high-powered handgun something is exceedingly wrong. There is not even a drop of blood on the floor. There is only this single area of staining on the light-colored shirt. The color is the same as the standard fake blood used in other hoaxes, plus it ‘bleeds’ into the area around the central focus; in other words, it separates through osmosis into a lighter color.
The kuffayeh of a women slaughtered by an Israeli canister – the blood remains consistently one color – no variation of purple to light red:
The color remains consistent. It doesn’t separate into two hues. The same is true, here, with the corpse of a child slaughtered by Israeli bombs, may almighty God rest the child’s delicate soul:
Versus…
Where are all those other wounded people? There does appear to be another crisis actor on the ground in the previous photo.
Therefore, the 2002 LAX El Al counter shootings are a fake. No one was killed, and no one was injured. The man on the ground is not dead and does not have the pallor of a dead person. This is yet another filthy Zionist lie. Following 911, the purpose was to accelerate the climate of Islamophobia for the benefit of the Zionist criminal mind.
Sources:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/711091/posts
http://articles.latimes.com/2002/jul/05/local/me-laxshoot5/2
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/terror-fears-after-la-shootout-6327524.html
Views: 0