The Globalist Nuclear Threat of September 2017 and the Fate of Donald Trump [+ a P.S. – ALERT: Chabad-Lubavitch’s two redeemers, Trump and Putin, and the UN attack (continued 1)]

I was planning to write this article tomorrow, but now it can’t wait. Get a load of this sh*t…

…from Infowars.com

So Martin Armstrong has a “war model” to explain why September 11/12 are dangerous days, eh? Bullsh*t! This is exactly the kind of crap I’ve been talking about in the previous entry: globalist mouthpieces using “human behavioral patterns” to explain an event so the globalists’ hand in, and motive for, the event is hidden from view.

September 11/12 are dangerous days because the big UN event starts on September 12, and a North Korean nuclear test, which would likely be scheduled on September 7, 11, or 12, would rocket North Korea to the top of the agenda and start the confrontation snowball rolling down the hill towards a simultaneous “North Korean” sneak attack on New York and Washington.

The Infowars article makes no mention of the UN meeting, or of the fact that Hurricane Harvey will likely result in the US Congress being in debate on the debt ceiling at the same time the UN is having its big meeting, thus presenting the perfect opportunity to take down both the UN and US on the same day. Such a simultaneous strike would take out Trump, take out the UN, and take out the US Congress, thus setting a US debt default in motion. It would be an instant sh*tstorm of epic proportions.

I will be writing in detail about this in the coming hours/days, but I’ll tell you this key point now…

WATCH WHAT CHINA DOES AFTER THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR TEST: If they cut off North Korea’s oil, or if they state the intention of discussing the cutoff of North Korea’s oil at the UN meeting, the day Xi goes to the UN will be the day of the attack. According to the globalist script, the North Koreans will want to strike on the day that both Xi and Trump are at the UN. So follow Xi, because “X” marks the temporal spot for the sneak attack.

Also, watch for the yield of the nuclear test to be 50 kilotons or more. This would allow the propaganda machine to argue it was an H-bomb (fusion) explosion, thus sending everyone into a hissy fit.

By the way, I’ve found a picture of Martin Armstrong’s “war model”…

~ continued 1 ~

Before I go into the sequence of events that would lead to the attack, you might want to know why I’ve been so insistent on warning about this scenario. There are two reasons…

Reason 1) A dual nuclear strike on New York and Washington would reliably and rapidly advance key elements of the globalist agenda. The globalists are at least a year behind on their NWO implementation schedule, so a nuclear strike would allow them to start catching up:

> It would allow them to do their scripted removal of Trump in one day instead of waiting months for an impeachment or 25th amendment removal procedure to unfold. And moving Pence (or Paul Ryan) into the presidency next month would allow them to quickly begin the escalation towards the planned US vs. Russia showdown in Syria.

> It would allow them to remove China’s Xi in one day. I’ve been writing about the reasons they will replace Xi since Update 1.

> It would allow them to clean out the US Congress and the Washington bureaucrats in one day. Their default plan for the cleanout involves encircling Washington with military forces loyal to the “progressive deep state,” mass-arresting all the “neocon-neolib deep state” officials, and putting them through an “American Nuremberg” show trial. All that would take months to accomplish. But in a post-attack scenario, they’d need only arrest the few survivors when the time for the counter-coup comes (the time would come after the “neocons-neolibs” seize dictatorial power in the US under a “continuity of government” scenario and lead us to the precipice of full-on nuclear war with Russia).

> It would send the world economy into a deep crisis in one day. This will facilitate the transition into the “new commodities-backed financial system” (a.k.a. the NWO financial system / “Beast” system).

> It would allow them to jumpstart their effort to “reform” the UN into the NWO. The nations would have to rebuild both the UN headquarters (perhaps some place other than in the US) and the UN’s structure (“to ensure that it has the strength to bring conflicts like the never-settled Korean War to conclusion”).

And on top of all this, a dual nuclear strike will allow the globalists to gain overwhelming public support for their transition plans. Once they reveal that the supposed “neocon-neolib deep state” helped the North Koreans get through our defenses to stage the attack, the public will line up solidly behind the “progressive deep state” and the NWO changes they’ll bring to America.

~ continued 2 ~

Reason 2) It is the outcome to which the preparatory propaganda is pointing.

For months now, the western media have been emphasizing the idea of a “preemptive decapitation strike” on Kim Jong-Un and other North Korean regime officials. Here is a recent example (note the release date of the article and the subtle linguistic programming at the top)…

…from Nikkei.com

As for how the preemptive decapitation strike would be carried out, it was suggested back in March that Seal Team 6 would infiltrate Pyongyang to do it…

…from Maxim

And the South Koreans just yesterday reiterated the idea of using commandos to kill Kim Jong-Un…

…from Independent.co.uk

So what will happen if the globalist script calls for Kim Jong-Un to “do unto others before they do it unto him”?

He will send commandos into the capital cities of his enemies to do some preemptive decapitations of his own.

That being said…

Who are North Korea’s enemies?

The US and the UN. Since the Korean War ended with an armistice instead of a peace treaty, North Korea is technically still at war with both.

What are their capital cities?

The US capital is Washington, DC and the UN’s capital is New York, NY.

How would North Korean commandos infiltrate those cities and attack “regime targets”?

In a gradual infiltration scenario, they might already be cooking bulgogi in Korean restaurants near the target cities (with their nuclear backpacks hidden under bags of rice)…

…(The guy on the front right looks more like a dish washer, though.)

In a quick infiltration scenario, they might use two small submarines carrying commandos and heavy nukes to simply cruise up to their targets, surface, and set off their warheads.

The UN is right next to the water…

And so is the White House and Capitol Building…

Infiltration by small submarine is common practice for North Korean commandos. Here’s just one famous example…

…from Wikipedia

The subs can be brought within underwater cruising distance of the target cities by specially-modified merchant ships. And with a little help from the “neocons and neolibs” in the Pentagon and intelligence services, they can arrive at their targets without detection (or under the guise of an “exercise”). According to the globalist script, this attack would allow the “neocon-neolib deep state” to remove Trump, take total control over the country (under existing “continuity of government” provisions), and move us into World War 3.

~ continued 3 ~

With my reasons for giving this warning now stated, let’s look at the things to watch for vis-a-vis the UN event…

1) The North Koreans will do a nuclear test at some point before (or at the beginning of) the UN event, and the test’s yield will likely be 50 kilotons or higher. So…

> watch August 7, 9, 11 and 12, which are the most likely dates for the test: the 7th because it would parallel last year’s test which happened 7 days after the end of the Ulchi-Freedom Guardian 2016 exercise; the 9th also because it would parallel last year’s test which happened on the 9th (North Korea’s “Day of the Foundation of the Republic”); the 11th because it’s the day before the UN event and a favored date for globalist mischief; and the 12th because North Korea is about half a day ahead of us, so the UN people in New York would go to bed on the 11th and wake up on the 12th to news of the test.

> watch for all the talking heads to declare it an H-bomb (fusion bomb) because of its yield. A yield of 50 kilotons or more would be at least five times higher than their previous test (by South Korea’s estimate of the last test’s yield).

And since the existing nuclear powers typically use a fusion design for 50+ kiloton warheads, a 50+ kiloton test would suggest that the North Koreans do indeed have H-bombs now. This would cause all eyes in the UN to turn to China with the demand that they cut off North Korea’s oil supply.

2) The Chinese, who “will not tolerate war on their doorstep,” will decide to “get serious with Kim” and either cut off his oil or offer to talk about cutting off his oil at the UN event. So…

> watch for the media to portray Kim as feeling cornered (by the US and UN) and betrayed (by the Chinese). They will emphasize the idea that an oil embargo, if it goes on for any significant length of time, will be the final straw that finally topples the Kim dynasty.

> watch for Kim to “go nuts” and start lashing out with provocations against the US. This would start the chain of events that lead to the sneak attack.

3) Kim Jong-Un will launch a preemptive decapitation strike against the US and UN, and he will use America’s own threats as a template for the attack (hence a commando strike against his enemies’ leaders in their own capital cities, just like his enemies planned for him in his capital city of Pyongyang).

> watch for the attack to occur when the UN event and the debt ceiling debate “sweet spots” are aligned. The sweet spots are the prime moments for an attack…

IN WASHINGTON, DC, the sweet spot will occur within a day or two of the projected vote on the debt ceiling. On the one hand, the vote will be near enough that the vast majority of Congresspersons will be in the Capitol Building wheeling and dealing; on the other hand, the vote will be far enough away that Rand Paul and Elizabeth Warren will feel comfortable slipping out of town and doing appearances in nearby communities.

IN NEW YORK, NY, the sweet spot will occur when both Xi and Trump are at the UN Headquarters together. Alternatively, it could occur when Xi is on the ground at the UN and Trump is on the ground at the White House either before or after they meet.

Before Hurricane Harvey came, the sweet spots were out of alignment. The UN event was scheduled for August 12 – 25, and the debt ceiling deadline was scheduled for August 29. By juicing up and steering Harvey into Houston, though, they’ve gained the flexibility to move the debt ceiling deadline forward. And if they steer Hurricane Irma towards Washington and New York, they’ll also gain the flexibility of pushing back Xi’s visit to the UN. If they intend to go forward with the attack, you will see them move the dates so the two sweet spots will coincide.

THIS ALIGNMENT OF THE SWEET SPOTS IS THE NUMBER ONE INDICATOR OF A GREEN-LIGHTED ATTACK. IF YOU ARE IN WASHINGTON, DC OR MANHATTAN ON THE DAY THE ALIGNMENT OCCURS, GET THE FU*K OUT. Better yet, stay away in the first place. I’ll tell you in advance when Xi will arrive. If, on the other hand, the alignment doesn’t occur, they won’t likely follow through with the dual strike scenario.

> watch for Rand Paul, Elizabeth Warren, and Mike Pence (or, less likely, Paul Ryan) to survive the attack. Pence, with his stern face and grey hair, is the perfect person to play the role of the “decoy Grey Champion.” He will be the “crypto-Satanist” president who leads the US into World War 3 and a nuclear showdown with Russia. As for Rand Paul and Elizabeth Warren, they are scripted to be the leaders of the Republican and Democratic parties after the “progressive deep state’s” counter-coup takes down Pence. Rand Paul will be America’s post-crisis NWO president.

Pence will most likely survive the attack in a nuke-resistant bunker. “Given the heightened threat posed by North Korea and President Trump’s trip to the UN,” the Secret Service will say, “we took Vice President Pence to a secure location as a standard continuity of government precaution.” Of course, seeing him sit out the attack in a bunker will raise a lot of red flags in the minds of many people, but that will be used to the globalists’ advantage when the “progressive deep state” tells everyone that Pence and his “neocon-neolib deep state” pals were in on the attack.

> watch for the New York bomb to possibly fizzle, leading to a decreased yield and high-level radioactive contamination of the area. There is some propaganda value in leaving the UN building partially intact and too contaminated to tear down. It would be “an eternal monument to the need for a strong multilateral world organization that has the teeth to enforce peace (the ‘reformed’ UN / NWO).”

~ continued 4 ~

Now that I’ve covered the basics of the dual strike scenario, I would be remiss in my duties if I failed to remind you of another card they could play vis-a-vis a North Korean nuclear attack: the fake ET / divine intervention card. If they were to decide to play it, the North Koreans would fire one or more nuclear missiles at an American target and the globalists would arrange for an “unknown party” to intercept any missile(s) that made it through American defenses. Such an attack would likely be staged after sunset (at the target) so people could make videos of the bright reentry vehicle(s) coming towards them…

You’d then see another bright object come in at high speed and dart around the reentry vehicle before it vaporizes.

They actually made an attempt at this scenario at last year’s Super Bowl, but I don’t know if it was a live op that got aborted or just a dry run. Read The CIA, the X-Files, and the North Korean H-bomb: A coordinated campaign? and the August 13 postscript of this entry for the details on both this scenario and what happened last year.

Everything I’m talking about in this entry can be considered an extension of the still-standing alert I issued on August 6, so read it for more details on what we’re facing. It includes information on how Guam is being used as both a distraction (to get us focused on the Pacific so we’ll be caught by surprise when we’re hit from the Atlantic) and a catalyst for mutual provocation in the lead-up to the sneak attack.

With all this being said, would the globalists ever go ahead with the nuke attack scenario now that it’s exposed? We’ll just have to wait and see. As much as anything else, September is a test of just how desperate the globalists have become. Tick-tock, tick-tock.

In tomorrow’s addendum, we’ll look into Trump’s fate.

More to come and love always…

(P.S. – 31 August 2017) – Let’s keep an eye on Hurricane Irma…

…from Zero Hedge

If they steer it up the East Coast, it could hit the Washington, DC / New York zone around the time of the UN meeting…

It could thus be used to delay elements of the UN event to better align them with the Congressional debate on the debt ceiling and/or to explain why the submarine detection systems were down at the time of the attack (unrepaired storm damage). The strike would likely occur during the event’s General Debate, which starts on the 19th (that’s when all the heads of state come in to blow hot air).

(P.S. – 2 September 2017) – The Debt Ceiling and Hurricane Irma

Treasury Secretary Mnuchin has now come out and said that the debt ceiling could be pulled forward a “couple of days” due to Hurricane Harvey. He also said the deadline will be shifted according to how much money is collected in corporate taxes on September 15, which pretty much gives him a free hand to move the deadline however he wishes (depending on how much in tax receipts he wishes to report).

On top of that, we must consider the costs that will be incurred if they steer Hurricane Irma into a major city or have it skirt the entire East Coast. Irma could pull forward the deadline too.

When you consider these factors, you see that the globalists have all the excuses they need to fudge the numbers and move the deadline forward as much as 10 days, which would put it as soon as the 19th (when the UN General Debate starts). So they have the ability to line up the sweet spots. Do they still have the will?

By the way, don’t you find it remarkably “coincidental” that the Treasury’s “extraordinary measures” to keep the government funded whenever it hits the debt ceiling always run out at the end of the fiscal year? They don’t run out months before or months after, but always right on time. This is because it’s all a bunch of bullsh*t, and the Treasury can cook the numbers to make the deadline occur at any time they want.

That being said, they’ve already publicly announced that the deadline would hit on the 29th, so they have to come up with plausible excuses to explain why it would move forward. That’s where the two hurricanes and the August 15 tax receipts come in. When all is said and done, the deadline will occur on the exact day they wish it to. If it falls a day or two after Xi’s scheduled appearance at the UN, I’ll issue a nuclear alert.

(P.S. – 2 September 2017) – Trump will speak at the UN on the 19th

After some searching, I finally found the information I was looking for regarding the General Debate at the UN…

> Trump is scheduled to speak there on the 19th. So if that’s the day he actually shows up AND the debt ceiling deadline gets adjusted to September 19, 20 or 21, the sweet spots will be aligned (even if Xi is not there).

> Xi is currently scheduled to be a no-show at the Debate, but we can expect that to change if North Korea tests “an H-bomb.” And if he shows up on a day other than the 19th, Trump will likely fly there to meet him.

> Following the North Korean nuclear test, both Trump and Xi could fly to the UN earlier than the 19th in order to meet with the UN Security Council. That would force the Treasury to really stretch in order to line up the sweet spots.

(P.S. – 3 September 2017) – Kim smacks Xi in the face with an H-bomb

Tick-tock indeed. They popped off the H-bomb a few days earlier than I was expecting, and the timing allowed them to upstage Xi at the beginning of the September 3-5 BRICS Summit in China. Gee whiz, I wonder if Xi will retaliate for such a move. 

(P.S. – 3 September 2017) – Watch the sweet spots this week

There is a good chance we’ll see an “emergency” UN Security Council meeting this week, and it might be scheduled after Tuesday so the BRICS leaders can attend. So we could see both Xi and Trump at the UN in just a few days. That’s sweet spot 1.

Also, there is talk of Congress voting on a hurricane relief bill this week that includes a debt ceiling hike. And no congressperson will want to miss out on that debate. That’s sweet spot 2.

Watch for Trump to do something provocatively aggressive in the meantime. That would set the stage for an early show.

~ continued 1 ~

Have a look at this little bit of scripting…

“President Trump needs to act unilaterally to name, shame and sanction any businesses, organizations and governments that help launder money for North Korea or assist the rogue nation in evading past or present sanctions. The amount of laundered money that goes to North Korea could easily amount to billions of dollars a year.

This anti-money laundering campaign will undoubtedly hurt China and its banks here in the U.S., but it’s a necessary step to ensure Beijing and Pyongyang understand that evading sanctions that the U.N., U.S. and other individual nations have imposed on the North will no longer be tolerated.” – from Fox News

So they’ll have Trump threaten Chinese economic interests, and given China’s precarious banking situation, Xi will move to cut off North Korea’s oil in exchange for Trump backing off. Quid pro quo, Clarice…

Also, the increased American military pivot to Asia that the article suggests is against China’s interests, so that’s another reason for Xi to take strong action to put all this to an end.

~ continued 2 ~

Two “Satanist” playgrounds burning…

…Are they telegraphing “god’s judgment by fire upon the wicked?”

In the coming days, take the time to savor America as it is now. For this could be the month, and even the week, that America changes forever – the time NWO historians point to as the beginning of the precipitous fall of “the American Empire.” (The “Empire” never was ours; it was always the banksters’, as is the next one.)

~ continued 3 ~

I almost forgot to mention the timely warning given by the “unparalleled geopolitical genius, Vladimir Putin”…

…from InfoWars. Compare the word I underlined in this headline to the word I bolded in the Fox News snippet above, then read Understanding the NWO Strategy. Can you guess which approach is scripted to bring disaster?

Getting back to Putin…

All hail the great and wise statesman who will soon save us all from the desperate nuclear flailings of the mortally wounded American Beast!

All hail our Savior, the Russian (Anti) Christ!!

(At least until it’s time to hail the Kabbalah Christ in 7 years.)

~ continued 4 ~

Cue the hair-trigger…

…From Yahoo/AFP

Allow me to translate some key elements of the article…

>>> The United States will launch a “massive military response” to threats from North Korea, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis said Sunday…

“Any threat to the United States or its territories, including Guam, or our allies will be met with a massive military response, a response both effective and overwhelming,” Mattis said. <<<

TRANSLATION: We’re going to assume that any medium-to-long-range ballistic missile test in the future is actually a nuclear-tipped attack missile, and we’ll strike it preemptively at its launch site.

>>> He added: “Kim Jong-Un should take heed of the United Nations Security Council’s unified voice. All members unanimously agreed on the threat North Korea poses and remain unanimous in their commitment to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. <<<

TRANSLATION: Don’t forget to target the United Nations when you do your own preemptive attack, Supreme Leader Kim.

>>> “We are not looking to the total annihilation of a country, namely North Korea, but as I said, we have many options to do so.” <<<

TRANSLATION: Your country will never be the same after we’re done with you, so you’d better do something drastic to us first.

And here’s an interesting little factoid: Kim Jong-Un is 33 years old. That’s a dangerous age for any globalist minion. I wouldn’t expect him to survive this chain of events, which brings us to an interesting point…

There’s a fair chance that none of these national leaders will actually be killed during this grand production. Their deaths will likely be simulated as they’re taken away to some isolated island or underground resort to sip on martinis with the “assassinated” Russian Ambassador to Turkey. Putin might go there too at some point, but they’d bring him back into public view during the prophecy show.

(P.S. – 3 September 2017) – Competing meetings and competing approaches

Hmmm… here’s an angle I hadn’t considered: the emergency meeting of the UN Security Council will be held tomorrow while the BRICS leaders are still in China at their own meeting. According to the linked article, the UN meeting will be held “at the request of the U.S., South Korea, Japan, France and Britain.” So we have competing meetings of Western allies and BRICS allies and competing approaches of severe sanctions (West) and “freeze for freeze” negotiations (BRICS). I’ll have to do some noodling on what they’re up to. Could this be the moment the BRICS stand up to the US to stop a nuclear war? Will our savior Putin have an earlier than expected debut?

I covered how Russia and China could win without a shot being fired back in this entry

I just came across a Zerohedge article titled “Is Russia Planning A Gold-Based Currency?” To give a simple answer to the question posed by the title, “yes,” both Russia and China (and possibly other BRICS allies) are planning to go to a partial gold backing for their currencies. And once they do, the globalist propaganda organs will laud the move as “the masterstroke that peacefully defeated the Western banksters.”

~ continued 1 ~

The media are reporting that a North Korean ICBM is being readied for launch. So what will Trump do? Will he go ahead and strike the launch site, or will he work his way up to that by first shooting down this missile after launch? I can see a shot-down missile leading to North Korea preparing a number of missiles for simultaneous launch, and that might be what triggers the attack on the launch site. Once Trump crosses that line – striking on North Korean soil – the North Korean preemptive strike will be set in motion.

~ continued 2 ~

After sleeping on the competing meetings / competing approaches idea, I can see both sides gathering at the UN event to reach a compromise: China offers to go along with oil sanctions if the US agrees to enter direct negotiations towards a “freeze for freeze” agreement. According to the geopolitical script, though, all Kim Jong-Un will see in this is oil sanctions, domestic unrest, and an inevitable disarmament that weakens his internal political position. So he’ll use ‘em before he loses ‘em, then threaten to use them again on Seoul, Tokyo, and San Francisco to forestall a counter-attack.

This scenario would bring Xi to the UN event for sweet spot 1. And if the Congress decides to leave Hurricane Harvey aid and the debt ceiling hike separate, that will keep sweet spot 2 fully intact for the UN event timeframe. If, on the other hand, they pass the debt ceiling hike this week, they still won’t be out of the woods. A debt ceiling hike is meaningless if they’re not alive to complete the budget at the end of the month (and the Treasury office that pays our debts is a smoking heap).

(P.S. – 4 September 2017) – Hurricane Irma and “smaller units” of government

It looks like they’re going to steer Hurricane Irma straight up Florida’s bunghole…

…And if they juice it up like they did with Harvey, it could ravage the whole state.

A hurricane hitting a whole state would put another dent in the debt ceiling, now wouldn’t it? It would also draw vast disaster resources to Florida. And after both Harvey and Irma, how much would be left for a post-strike Washington and New York – especially if there’s no fully-functioning government for a while? The states would have to stand on their own, and that could be the beginning of the NWO move towards “smaller units” of government. Here is a section from an old entry on that subject…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

I take you back to the 1961 NWO blueprint book Prospect for America. This is from page 26…
nwovision26su

The globalists want the NWO to consist of “smaller units” because smaller nations are less likely to be self-sufficient in maintaining their security and a modern standard of living. They want all the nations to be dependent on the multilateral framework for their security and economic wellbeing.

Besides the Rockefellers’ NWO architects, can you guess who else is talking about “smaller units”? Ron Paul (in this interview on RT)…

“I happen to believe in smaller units of government; the larger the unit of government, the worse things are…

So I think people should have the right to leave a larger unit of government.”

And what else is Ron Paul talking about? Secession in the US
paulsecession
Note that he gave this speech at a Mises Institute conference called Breaking Away: The Case for Secession

[Starting from the 1:20 mark] – “I would like to start off by talking about the subject, and the subject, of course, is secession and nullification — the breaking up of government. And the good news is it’s gonna happen. It’s happening. And it’s not gonna be because there will be enough people in the US Congress to legislate it — it won’t happen. It will be de facto.”

<<<END EXCERPT

When you take a moment to think about it, how many states are going to want to stay in the USA after the hated Washington government has been vaporized and its dictatorial remnants take us into World War 3? Not many. And in post-crisis President Rand Paul, they will find a sympathetic figure to help them on their way.

(P.S. – 5 September 2017) – September 18 and 19 are not good days to be in Manhattan or Washington DC

Wow, so much to cover…

It looks like the most likely UN/Washington strike window is September 18-19, especially the 18th (6+6+6). I’ll go into the details as I can over the course of the day.

~ continued 1 ~

Here is the Trump-only strike scenario that seems to be materializing:

1) North Korea will launch an ICBM between now and September 9. Trump will, at the very least, shoot it down. This occurs just a few days before the September 12 UN event.

2) Kim Jong-Un, supposedly incensed over the shootdown of his missile, will order 4 more missiles to be prepped for launch. Since North Korea has previously talked of a 4-missile attack on the area around Guam, Trump will have a “justifying threat” for a strike on the missile base. The strike will occur sometime around the 16th. (BTW: In Asian numerology, the number “4” is associated with death, so giving somebody four of something is like sentencing them to death.)

3) A few days later on September 18th (6+6+6), Trump will hold a meeting at the UN. The subject: UN reform. It will be during either this meeting or Trump’s speech the next day that the “North Korean” strike on the UN will occur. Both Xi and Putin will be absent.

4) To line up the sweet spots for a simultaneous Washington strike, you might also see the debt limit deadline advanced to sometime from August 18 to August 21 (on account of the two hurricanes and “lower than expected” corporate tax receipts). This would force Congress to forgo their district work week and stay in Washington to hike the limit (and “take the heat”).

According to previous news reports and as things stand now, Xi and Putin are no-shows to the event. If they decide to come to broker a peace deal or make an announcement, though, there are two ways that could go. More on that later.

~ continued 2 ~

Getting back to Xi and Putin, the emergency UN Security Council meeting yesterday was predictably divided between the Western calls to cut off Kim’s oil and the BRICS calls for a “freeze for freeze” dialog. But once the upcoming missile provocations occur, there’s a chance that Xi and Putin will go to the UN event to talk to Trump and cut a deal. If so, the strike would be the day that the leaders meet at UN Headquarters.

But why would Kim Jong-Un kill Putin and Xi along with Trump, you ask? Because according to the globalist script, the “neocon-neolib deep state” wants them dead…

> According to globalist faux-truther propagandists like Alex Jones, Xi “double-crossed the globalists when he started his territorial expansion into the South China Sea”…

…From InfoWars. So they supposedly want him dead.

> Also according to the faux-truthers, Putin is both a “traitor to the New World Order” and its greatest foe…

…from Google. So they supposedly want him dead too.

To explain Kim’s betrayal of both Xi and Putin, then, it will be said that the “neolib-neocon deep state” made a deal with him: “take out Trump, Xi, and Putin for us and we will have Pence, Li, and Medvedev protect you from any real harm in the aftermath.”

You must remember that when Medvedev was President of Russia, he allowed the West to do what they wanted in Libya. Once Putin returned to the Presidency, though, he stopped the West in Syria. So the globalists have already written in a backstory for Medvedev to play the Judas character in this production. According to the script, he is an “Atlantic Integrationist” / friend of the West.

All this being said, a “trifecta strike” would go down like this…

Trump, Putin, and Xi would meet behind closed doors at the UN before the strike. And when I say “meet,” I mean they’d exit the complex through an escape tunnel or back door and be taken to a secure location. Putin would later reappear during the prophecy show, and he’d bring “powerful friends” with him.

Oh, I almost forgot to mention the second way a Xi / Putin trip to the UN event could go. They could show up and make some sort of “brilliant move” to stall the crisis. If the globalists have to cancel the op, they might as well use the cancellation to help boost Putin’s cult of personality, right?

(P.S. – 7 September 2017) – UN reform and Nuclear Scare #1

Before the globalists bailed on their plans to start this Pacific war in May, I posted this…

The nuclear war scare in the May US-China Conflict will put institutional reform front and center on the UN agenda, and the much more serious nuclear war scare in the September US-Russia Conflict will compel them to enact the reforms without further delay.

Although the globalists delayed the Pacific war till September, they have done as I expected and started the conversation on UN reforms in conjunction with it. Press reports on the BRICS Summit specifically mentioned the subject, as did the Summit Communique…

…from The Indian Express

Also, Trump is holding a meeting on UN reform on the very day the nuclear attack may happen…

…from TASS

Should the UN be struck while Trump is holding a meeting on UN reform, it will…

> “burn” the reform issue into everyone’s mind,
> decimate the UN’s existing structure, making way for reform, and
> illustrate the need to strengthen the UN so issues like North Korea won’t drag on for decades without being resolved.

If you read the TASS article on Trump’s reform meeting, you’ll notice that it casts the US reform initiative in a negative light, using the word “diktat.” This is the same word Putin has used when describing the unilateral / unipolar (decoy) New World Order the West is supposedly seeking…

…from InfoWars

So it may be that the globalists will portray a conflict between competing views on the UN reform effort too, with the faux-truther alternative press casting it in terms of a West versus BRICS battle between the (decoy) unilateral NWO and the (real) multilateral NWO. The BRICS and multilateralism will win of course.

~ continued 1 ~

As expected, the Chinese are agreeing to the compromise I wrote about earlier (US-desired oil sanctions in exchange for BRICS-desired “freeze for freeze” dialog)…

…from Google News: CBS article link, New Straits Times article link.

So what North Korea does on Saturday will tell us if the op has been canceled or if they’re trying for the “trifecta strike” I wrote about earlier. If Kim holds off on ICBM launches for a while, it’s canceled; if they fire the ICBM on Saturday, it’s still in play.

In the latter case, the two expected provocations (1 ICBM launched / 1 shootdown, then 4 ICBMs prepped / 1 launch site strike) would send Xi and Putin rushing to the UN to stop a nuclear war, thus putting them right in the crosshairs of the sneak attack.

(P.S. – 7 September 2017) – Trump’s Fate: Failed Savior or Establishment Antichrist?

Shifting our attention to Syria, we again see the scripted reason the “neocon-neolib deep state” must rush their effort to either remove or fully turn Trump…

…from Xinhua

The globalists are scripting an approaching victory for Syrian government forces, so the “neocon-neolib deep state” must urgently move to reinforce and resupply their ISIS / regime change forces before Syria is lost to them. A Syrian government victory will be drawn out to take months of course, which keeps the door open for all the options that are in play for Trump…

1) Assassination by North Korean nuke
2) Suicide due to deep state pressure and emotional instability
3) Impeachment and removal
4) Removal under the 25th amendment
5) Resignation due to ineffectiveness or to prevent civil war
6) Complete capture by the “deep state,” resulting in a betrayal of Putin
7) Revelation of his true character as a Crypto-Democrat and “deep state” crony

Which of these options will the globalists ultimately employ, you ask? It all depends on what they’re able to pull off and what the public is willing to buy. That’s why they have all of them in play: to maximize their ability to improvise in pursuit of their goals.

All of this gets me thinking of what they’re planning for Trump on the prophecy fulfillment side. Will they simply present him as an “all-too-human” Christian who buckled under the “deep state” pressure that only the “returned Christ” Putin could withstand? Or will he be presented as the latest antichrist figure if he turns against Putin (thus taking Obama’s place as Putin’s antichrist foil)?

Trump’s betrayal of his campaign promises, including his complete sellout to the Democrats on the debt ceiling yesterday and today, suggests they may be positioning him to play the “wolf in sheep’s clothing” (the Establishment Democrat posing as a populist Republican) if they don’t kill off his character this month.

+
+++
+++++
++++++++++New Material++++++++++
+++++
+++
+

(P.S. – 8 September 2017) – Chabad-Lubavitch’s two redeemers, Trump and Putin, and the UN attack

When the idea that Trump might be converted into an antichrist character came to mind yesterday, I started doing some research and stumbled across this article from the Right Wing Watch propaganda site…

…Here is an excerpt…

>>> Televangelist Jim Bakker hosted several fellow End Times preachers on his television program today to discuss the prophetic implications of the presidential election.

One of Bakker’s guests, Tom Horn, a prolific author of Last Days-themed books, spent an entire segment of the program explaining that “rabbis” have revealed that Trump may be the messiah, or a harbinger to the arrival of the messiah akin to John the Baptist.

“They’re looking at Donald Trump” as the messiah, Horn said of “the rabbis,” saying that Trump’s name “actually means ‘messiah.’”

Among the clues that Trump may be the messiah, he said, is that the president-elect is a kingly and warrior-like leader committed to protecting Israel and, according to Horn, rebuilding the Temple of Jerusalem.

Horn said that if Trump is not the messiah, then he is likely “the forerunner” to the messiah who “will start the message in the wilderness and the messiah is going to come in on his heels.”

If Trump turns out to only be a John the Baptist-like figure, Horn explained, then his inauguration will signal the beginning of the “countdown to the appearance of the messiah.” <<<

The “End Times pastor” to whom the article refers, Tom Horn, is the premier prophecy mouthpiece for the Freemasons and Jesuits. He is their standard bearer in the not-so-great work of laying down the preparatory propaganda for the globalist prophecy fulfillment effort, so the scenarios of which he speaks must be taken seriously. Here is the video of Horn speaking about Trump…

…from YouTube

Seeing him speak of Trump in this manner brought to mind the “End Times” script of the Chabad-Lubavitch “Jewish” (Kabbalist) Cult, in which the “Moshiach ben Yossef” is the forerunner of the “Moshiach ben David.” Here are some key parts of it straight from their website (as you read it, think “Trump” whenever you see “Mashiach ben Yossef” and “Putin” whenever you see “Mashiach ben David”…

>>> Jewish tradition speaks of two redeemers, each one called Mashiach. Both are involved in ushering in the Messianic era. They are Mashiach ben David and Mashiach ben Yossef.

The term Mashiach unqualified always refers to Mashiach ben David (Mashiach the descendant of David) of the tribe of Judah. He is the actual (final) redeemer who shall rule in the Messianic age. All that was said in our text relates to him.

Mashiach ben Yossef (Mashiach the descendant of Joseph) of the tribe of Ephraim (son of Joseph), is also referred to as Mashiach ben Ephrayim, Mashiach the descendant of Ephraim. He will come first, before the final redeemer, and later will serve as his viceroy.

The essential task of Mashiach ben Yossef is to act as precursor to Mashiach ben David: he will prepare the world for the coming of the final redeemer. Different sources attribute to him different functions, some even charging him with tasks traditionally associated with Mashiach ben David (such as the ingathering of the exiles, the rebuilding of the Bet Hamikdash, and so forth).

The principal and final function ascribed to Mashiach ben Yossef is of political and military nature. He shall wage war against the forces of evil that oppress Israel…

The immediate results of this war will be disastrous: Mashiach ben Yossef will be killed. This is described in the prophecy of Zechariah, who says of this tragedy that “they shall mourn him as one mourns for an only child.” (Zechariah 12:10). His death will be followed by a period of great calamities. These new tribulations shall be the final test for Israel, and shortly thereafter Mashiach ben David shall come, avenge his death, resurrect him, and inaugurate the Messianic era of everlasting peace and bliss. – from Chabad.org <<<

Do you see how well the description of Moshiach be Yossef matches what Horn described about Trump? Do you see how well that final paragraph would match with Donald Trump being “killed” in the nuclear attack on the UN? And Trump being discreetly removed from the building right before the strike would be of great help in “resurrecting” him, wouldn’t it?

This being said, if you are at the September 18 UN reform meeting and you see Donald Trump slipping out of the room “to go use the bathroom,” you have less than 15 minutes to put some miles between you and the UN Building. Run rabbit run.

Here are some entries you need to read in the meantime…

Trump and Putin: Agents of Chabad Lubavitch
Israel’s Chief Sephardic Rabbi Confirms Putin is a Jew
Is Vladimir Putin the Jewish Messiah?

~ continued 1 ~

Getting back to the American Moshiach, Donald Trump, his primary role is to prepare the way for the Russian Moshiach, Vladimir Putin. So how has Trump done that for Putin? For starters, the “Jewish Christian” Trump beat the “Satanist” Clinton in the presidential election, thus “breaking the hold of the Crypto-Satanists on the highest office in America.” And as Commander-in-Chief, “Trump was able to block the military-industrial complex’s effort to start a war with Russia over Ukraine and Syria.”

According to the dictates of the script, Trump has given ground to the “deep state” on issue after issue – even verbally criticizing Russia at times – but he has also “forced the military to respect the Syria truce he made with Putin” and “cut off US support of regime change forces in Syria.” This has allowed Putin and Assad to advance to near-victory in the “end times battle for Syria.” In fact, just yesterday the US military stopped harassing an ISIS convoy that was retreating under a truce with Assad. And why did they stop? Because Russia simply requested it. Would the Pentagon have accepted Russia’s request if Hillary Clinton were in office?

Source Article from http://redefininggod.com/2017/08/the-globalist-nuclear-threat-of-september-2017-and-the-fate-of-donald-trump/

Views: 0

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes