RSS Feed
January 13th, 2023 
Awake Goy 
First of all, my 2nd cousin George Washington was the president of the Constitutional Convention.
Of the 25 Ensurers of the Magna Carta, the 17 who have living prodigy are my great grandfather types as well as the King of England who implemented the reforms of the Magna Carta.
When I took my university entrance exam I scored in the top 97% of the whole country.
The areas I was hotter than a firecracker in were Law, Government, History, Military Matters, and Real Economics.
This is worth a read and I agree with a good bit of it.
When I repost and link an article on this site because it has some good information or thoughts I most times will also point out where the author of the article is either wrong or mixing propaganda with the truths.
From this article.
“They promised three things: that the constitution would ensure the government would respect the freedoms of the citizenry, that it would provide a means of keeping the peace among the member states, and that it would provide a strong military defense.
Sadly, the constitution long ago failed on two counts out of three. A mere 73 years after its ratification, the constitution failed to prevent a bloody civil war. The Federalists had promised that wouldn’t happen. When it comes to the matter of freedom, of course, the record is even worse, and the constitution has been used to justify countless assaults on liberty from Japanese internment to unleashing armies of spies against the American people.”
Let us look again at this sentence:
“A mere 73 years after its ratification, the constitution failed to prevent a bloody civil war.”
A civil war is when two or more factions try to control the same seat of power or government.
This does not apply to the Marxist yankee’s illegal invasion of the Southern countries joined together in a Confederacy.
Secession was not declared “illegal” in a yankee kangaroo court until 1869, four years after the war was over in TEXAS vs WHITE.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Texas-v-White
Had the constitution meant anything, USA terrorist troops would not have been allowed to line up and gang rape till death little children, minister’s daughters and pregnant women.
They would not have been allowed to steal everything not tied down or they could pry loose to include digging the dead up to steal the jewelry off their dead bodies.
They would not have been allowed to holocaust whole cities filled with civilians with Arson or blow them to bits with their siege guns.
They would not have been allowed to burn grandpas and grandmas to death in their own homes.
And closet homosexual who shacked up with men.
Lincoln killed the Volunteer Union of the American Revolutionaries replacing it with a Mandatory Marxist Military Dictatorship thinly disguised as a constitutional republic.
The UNITED STATES after Lincoln is not the same government, not the same organization as the United States of the Revolutionaries.
1938 red Russian Commie USA presidential Convention, where Lincoln was recognized as the Father of American zionism/Communism.
‘Red (Communist) Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxists: Marxism in the “Civil War”
‘The Republican Charade: Lincoln and His Party’
Next:
“The only area in which the constitution has “succeeded” has been in growing the size of the central government in Washington. The enormous state that has grown out of the constitution of 1787 has indeed rendered invasion by foreign powers virtually impossible. But this has been done at the cost of numerous elective wars, trillions in waste, and an out-of-control national security state.”
The foreign power which now controls USA/DC
did not use military invasion to take over, they used bribes to whored out politicians
and Mossad Jeffery Child Rape videos to blackmail the whored out no honor political prostitutes to commit treason against America and Americans.
So you see the one thing the author states the constitution was able to do, it failed at.
One last thing.
My country, The Republic of Texas has been illegally militarily occupied for 158 years and counting by the closet homosexual atheist marxist Lincoln’s dictatorship.
I see no use in fighting a war for freedom from occupation to free Texas when the USA/DC empire is dying.
Once the Empire dies, its fiat currency is worthless, ‘THE STATE OF TEXAS’, the illegal occupying sub corporation of the USA/DC corporation will lose its currency supply and occupying muscle of the US Military and US Corporate Kangaroo courts.
Then without a war, without a bloodbath, real Texicans can clean the Israhell firsters
Mexico Firsters
And Child Gang Raping till death yankee carpetbaggers and their litters born on Texas soil.
the hell out of Texas and reinstall a legal form of governance.
The Ole Texican Dog!
01/10/2023Ryan McMaken
If one cares to look, it’s not difficult to find numerous columns written for mainstream news outlets announcing that the US Constitution has failed. This ought to raise the question of “failed to do what?” The answer depends largely on the one claiming the constitution has failed. On the Left, claims of constitutional failure generally revolve around the idea that the constitution doesn’t empower the federal government enough. For example, Chris Edelson of the American Constitutional Society believes the constitution has failed because the US government hasn’t done enough about global warming and racial injustice. Ryan Cooper at The Week says the constitution is a failure because of gerrymandering and not enough “democracy.” On the other hand, many classical liberals (i.e., libertarians) have declared the constitution a failure because it has failed to restrain the US government from violating human rights such as life and property.
We see there are many standards we might employ to show that the constitution has failed, depending on what metric we wish to use. But let’s ask what the politicians pushing the new constitution of 1787—i.e., the “Federalists”—promised as the benefits of the new constitution. They promised three things: that the constitution would ensure the government would respect the freedoms of the citizenry, that it would provide a means of keeping the peace among the member states, and that it would provide a strong military defense.
Sadly, the constitution long ago failed on two counts out of three. A mere 73 years after its ratification, the constitution failed to prevent a bloody civil war. The Federalists had promised that wouldn’t happen. When it comes to the matter of freedom, of course, the record is even worse, and the constitution has been used to justify countless assaults on liberty from Japanese internment to unleashing armies of spies against the American people.
The only area in which the constitution has “succeeded” has been in growing the size of the central government in Washington. The enormous state that has grown out of the constitution of 1787 has indeed rendered invasion by foreign powers virtually impossible. But this has been done at the cost of numerous elective wars, trillions in waste, and an out-of-control national security state.
Yet, nostalgic appeals to the alleged greatness of the constitution—and the brilliance of the so-called “Founding Fathers”—continue to be a fixture in defending the status quo while granting legitimacy to the regime. Any real challenge to federal power, however, will require we stop clinging emotionally to this failed legal document that has secured neither peace nor freedom.
The Constitution Does Not Protect Freedom
When it comes to the Constitution’s ability to restrain government power, it is apparent that the text of the document is insufficient to counter efforts to empower the federal government rather than limit it. We need only look around us to see how the federal government taxes, regulates, spies, sues, and imprisons countless Americans with federal powers that are in no way authorized in the constitution itself.
It is also apparent that the public and their representatives are uninterested in limiting federal power. I claim no novelty in pointing this out, of course. More astute observers recognized the impotence and failure of the US Constitution decades ago. As Murray Rothbard wrote in 1961:
From any libertarian, or even conservative, point of view, it has failed and failed abysmally; for let us never forget that every one of the despotic incursions on man’s rights in this century, before, during and after the New Deal, have received the official stamp of Constitutional blessing.
And before Rothbard, there was Lysander Spooner, who noted:
the Constitution is no such instrument as it has generally been assumed to be; but that by false interpretations, and naked usurpations, the government has been made in practice a very widely, and almost wholly, different thing from what the Constitution itself purports to authorize….But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain—that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.
In our modern day and age, anything that the regime’s federal judges decide is “constitutional” is, in fact, de facto constitutional. In other words, appealing to the text of the Constitution to claim illegitimacy for the latest government power grab is pointless and irrelevant to the task of actually limiting the power of the state.
MORE:
https://mises.org/wire/constitution-failed-it-secured-neither-peace-nor-freedom
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
