Syria resolution debacle proves it is time to delegitimise the UN

By
Melanie Phillips

Last updated at 6:03 PM on 5th February 2012

Bloodshed: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is desperately clinging on to power

Bloodshed: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is desperately clinging on to power

Upwards of 200 people are reported to have been massacred in Syria in the latest in a series of atrocities in that country which have left thousands of people dead as President Bashar al-Assad ruthlessly clings to power.

Yet the UN has failed to act:

‘A United Nations Security Council effort to end the violence in Syria collapsed in acrimony and a veto by Russia and China on Saturday, hours after the Syrian military attacked the ravaged city of Homs in what opposition leaders described as the bloodiest government assault in the nearly 11-month-old uprising.

‘The Security Council voted 13 to 2 in favor of a resolution backing an Arab League peace plan for Syria, but the measure was blocked by Russia and China, which opposed what they saw as a potential violation of Syria’s sovereignty.’

The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, according to his spokesman, ‘deeply regrets’ this failure:

‘The spokesman called the resolution’s failure a “disappointment,” adding that “it undermines the role of the United Nations and the international community”.’

‘Undermines the UN’s role’? No. What this veto does is instead to demonstrate in the starkest way the utter intrinsic bankruptcy of the UN. For Russia is actually propping up the Assad regime, and has supplied it with the weapons being used to massacre Syria’s population. Yet through its membership of the UN Security Council, Russia is able to block a move to end that bloodshed.

'Disgusted': Russian representative Vitaly Churkin, centre, provoked international outrage after vetoing a draft resolution backing an Arab League call for Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down

‘Disgusted’: Russian representative Vitaly Churkin, centre, provoked international outrage after vetoing a draft resolution backing an Arab League call for Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down

This is tantamount to the fox being given control of the hen-house. But this is not an aberration. The idea that the UN purports to be an honest broker in trying to bring peace and justice to the world when so many of its members are tyrannies, or that it is entitled to sit in judgment over human rights abuses when countries such as China, Cuba or Saudi Arabia are on its Human Rights Council, is a sick joke. And yet the UN is considered to be so authoritative that no country can now go to war without its imprimatur.

The result is that tyranny and mass murder get a free pass, because the atrocities the UN is supposedly in existence to prevent are being perpetrated by regimes that have clout within or veto power over the UN itself. The apparent shock over and condemnation of the Russian/Chinese veto by the US and other western countries are deeply hypocritical.

Anti-Syrian regime protesters burn Russian and Chinese flags

Violence: Anti-Syrian regime protesters burn Russian and Chinese flags

The UN has long shown itself to be a grotesque and Orwellian parody of a dispassionate arbiter of global peace, international law and human rights. Yet the US, Britain and the rest continue to invest it with a legitimacy it does not possess, thus ensuring that through the UN wicked regimes not only go unpunished but continue to subvert the protection of the victims of tyranny.

The debacle over the Syria resolution demonstrates that it is time to delegitimise the UN – a noble idea which long ago blew up in the face of the civilised world it is supposed to protect.

Here’s what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts,
or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

Yes! Get rid of it! At least move it to Belgium or Switzerland where these useless things usually are placed. We could really use the addition tax revenue in NYC if all that real estate was converted back to commercial or residential use.

The USA is by far the biggest user of the UN veto mostly on behalf of Israel. Time and time again we see the UN branded useless if it the Security Council will not give in to US bullying, funding is withdrawn and media frenzy is manufactured.
Double standards is the name of the game just ask the people of Gaza.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Views: 0

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes