RSS Feed
October 28th, 2014 
David Schulberg The chances that WikiLeaks’ co-founder Julian Assange might have had his legal battle with Sweden ended on Monday appear to have faded away, as the court is unwilling to drop the arrest warrant over sexual assault allegations.
The Swedish court was due to announce an official ruling on
Assange’s appeal to drop his arrest warrant. It was issued after
he failed to meet the Monday deadline to come to Sweden for
questioning over rape accusations. While no news on the decision
immediately emerged, the Chief Prosecutor’s Office told RT that
its position hasn’t changed.
In response to Assange’s appeal earlier in September, the
prosecution argued that “the purpose behind the remand into
custody of Julian Assange in his absence is to prevent Julian
Assange from absconding or avoiding criminal proceedings or
punishments for named crimes.”
The WikiLeaks co-founder and editor-in-chief says the case has
been trumped up to hand him over to the US, where he is being
investigated for espionage.
“There are two reasons [for the prosecution not lifting the
warrant]: one is the prestige on account of the prosecutor, the
second one is almost certainly that the US administration is
making it known to Swedish authorities that they would like it
very much if they kept Mr Assange where he is and leave it as it
is,” Swedish activist and politician Lars Christian Engstrom
told RT.
In July, a Swedish court upheld an arrest warrant for Julian
Assange.
READ MORE: Assange arrest warrant upheld by
Swedish court
At the time, Assange’s defense team said the European arrest
warrant should be lifted on the grounds that the prosecution had
failed to act in a timely manner by not interviewing their client
at the embassy.
The prosecution argued it was impossible to collect evidence and
carry out investigation outside Sweden. After Assange’s appeal,
it stayed true to its arguments, saying “we maintain our view
that examination of Julian Assange and the performance of a body
search in England would not be an effective way.”
The Swedish prosecutors have also opposed the whistleblower’s
request to submit a transcript of SMSs to the court of appeal, on
which the investigation against him is based. Stating that the
defense has received this material before on police premises, it
would not present it to Assange, because the documents that
“contain sensitive information” could be published
online. This has happened with other related materials in the
case.
The whistleblower has recently announced plans to leave the
Ecuadorian Embassy in the near future.
READ MORE: Assange plans to leave embassy ‘soon’,
no details given August
The reasoning behind Assange’s announcement at the time was a
change to the European arrest warrant, director of the Center for
Investigative Journalism, Gavin MacFadyen, told RT.
“The law has changed in a sense that no one now in Britain
can be extradited against their will to a country without being
charged. And of course as everybody knows what is significant
about Julian Assange’s difficulties is that he’s never been
charged,” MacFadyen said.
Prosecutors have once again argued that Assange’s life at the
embassy could not be considered a deprivation of his liberty, as
“he himself made the choice of visiting the Embassy of
Ecuador and remaining there.”
But even if the court accepted Assange’s appeal to cancel the
arrest warrant hanging over him, it would not necessarily mean
the whistleblower could safely leave his hideout in the British
capital.
UK has now spent £7,744,357 pounds surrounding #Assangehttps://t.co/LUmCrrkP3l
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) 27
октября 2014
“Authorities in London were quick to point out recently, when
there was a possibility that his arrest warrant could be revoked,
there was still the issue of him jumping bail, so they would
arrest him if he leaves the embassy – but practically speaking
there would be no more foundation to keep him inside the embassy
anymore,” WikiLeaks spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson told RT.
In the lead-up to the ruling, Assange had been critical of
Swedish prosecutors for pursuing the case against him. Last week,
he stated via video link: “We will win because the law is
very clear. My only hope is that the court is following the law
and is not pressured politically to do anything outside of the
law.”
Assange has been living in the Ecuadorian Embassy since August
2012 to escape an international arrest warrant to extradite him
to Sweden, where he is wanted for questioning about the
allegations. He was later granted asylum by the South American
country.
The Embassy is under constant surveillance by London’s
Metropolitan Police, who are under orders to arrest the
43-year-old if he leaves its confines. The security operation is
reported to have cost over £7.7 million pounds ($12.4 million),
according to govwaste.co.uk.
Lawyers for the WikiLeaks founder filed eavesdropping claims to
the Swedish Court of Appeal on October 17, as Assange fears that
he was being bugged. His legal team said that he “is most
likely under auditory surveillance,” which was reported by
the Daily Mail.
In the summer of 2013, a recording device was found beneath a
desk in the office of Ana Alban, the Ecuadorean Ambassador to the
United Kingdom, according to Reuters. Ricardo Patino, the
country’s foreign minister said the microphone was discovered on
June 16 before he visited the embassy to meet with Assange, who
lives and works in a different room of the office.
In July, a Swedish court upheld its detention order against
Assange. In June, the 43-year-old’s lawyers sought to get the
ruling by the Stockholm court in 2010 overturned on the basis
that it could not be enforced while he is at the embassy, and
because it is restricting Assange’s civil rights.
The Australian fears that if he is sent to Sweden for
investigation into alleged rape, he will be transferred to the
United States, where he could face a possible trial for his part
in WikiLeaks publishing numerous sensitive documents in 2010.
These papers contained both secret military and diplomatic
correspondences.
If found guilty in the US, Assange could face a 35-year prison
sentence for revealing classified documents concerning the
country’s military activities in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Source Article from http://rt.com/news/199951-assange-sweden-court-appeal/
Swedish prosecutors keep up arrest warrant against Assange
http://rt.com/news/199951-assange-sweden-court-appeal/
http://rt.com/rss/news/
RT – News
RT : News
http://rt.com/static/img/RT_logo_250x250.png
Views: 0
Posted in 
