State of the Union: Obama’s Cloward-Piven Strategy

January 30th, 2014

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

January 29, 2014

Obama’s State of the Union Address largely focused on redistribution of wealth.
“Let’s give America a raise,” the President from Goldman Sachs said.

This strategy was first enunciated in 1966 by two Marxist sociologists, Richard Cloward and Francis Piven. It involves bribing individuals and corporations with fiat money. This ensures the bankers both gain power and shackle the nation with debt.

Legalize 12 million illegal Mexican immigrants:

Comments for “State of the Union: Obama’s Cloward-Piven Strategy “

Marcos said (October 28, 2012):

This is a timely and precise article.

The US is going bankrupt, and when the bubble blows, it will be like an atomic bomb compared with the firecracker of Greece.
I suggest people read Theodore Dalrymple’s books. A physician who worked with the poor in England, he correctly blames socialism for destroying the fabric of British life, with examples, anecdotes and conclusions that are impossible to negate. Obama is doing the same in the States, creating a generation of useless, dysfunctional slaves of the State. The parallels are too many to deny it is a global strategy.

KP Ryan said (October 28, 2012):

The article states Obama is going to ‘legalize 12 million illegals’. Yet the readers at the same time trust Romney is somehow going to send those same 12 million back to their homelands in Mexico, Central, and South America? Both candidates work for the same entity. Either candidate will do as they are told or face a bullet. If ordered, either man will legalize; evict; or even murder the 12 million.

Mr. Root asks: “Where did all (the stimulus and bailout) money go?” Hmmm. It went in the same pockets that George Bush II’s stimulus/bailout money went. Somehow when reading writers like Mr. Root, we’re supposed to forget who enacted the first bankster bailout. Bush and a Republican Congress, that’s who. Again, as there’s little to differentiate Bush and Obama, there’s precious little difference between Obama and Romney. They are like 2 show windows facing opposite street corners belonging to the same department store. One features clothing that appeals to a conservative buyer. The other window features clothing made in the same SE Asian sweatshop, but that appears a bit more fashionable or modern. Each window offers goods appealing to a different set of customers, yet both are under the same department store roof.

Mr. Root’s article is simply a collection of talking points meant to herd those Americans who believe truth is broadcast on Fox News. “What will your lives be like under Communism?” he asks in an effort to inflame the Reagan Conservative. Were Mr. Root an honest man, he’d focus on all the changes since 9/11 that have worked to incorporate a fascist/statist system on all Americans’ lives.

Fact is, I’d rather have a true Muslim (or a true Catholic or frankly a real Jew unencumbered by zionism who recognizes the State of Israel is in fact a thumbing of the Jewish nose at the Creator) in the WH than a man or woman who’s in bed with the Satanic Illuminati and has no allegiance to God or human life.

anon said (October 28, 2012):

Just saw the article posted and unfortunately, it is very inaccurate in a number of regards.

I will just comment ofn the Puerto Rico issue.

President Ronald Reagan was vehement in many of his speeches calling for a 51st State of Puerto Rico. He even mentioned it in several of his speeches to congress.

Mitt Romney has now also said that he will make P.R. the 51st state.

This is the worst election in my lifetime and I honestly feel that both candidates should be rejected by the American people. Neither are capable of fulfilling the Oath of Office, which states: ” I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”.

Please see link:
http://www.governing.com/news/state/sl-puerto-rico-gets-romney-approval.html

Sana said (October 27, 2012):

Root said Obama is a devout Muslim, but actually (aside from his other associations which have been proven) he doesn’t fit the criteria of a Muslim, namely the 5 pillars – the 5 prayers, specifically. Also if one is a Muslim it has to be announced to the world. He has to say what his creed is, no hiding. This is part of what Islam requires.

Rather he fits the definition of someone who used to be Muslim but
apostated (is no LONGER Muslim).

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at