RSS Feed
March 3rd, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
http://pesn.com/2012/02/22/9602042_South_African_Fuel-Free_Generator_Preparing_for_Market/
You are here: PureEnergySystems.com
News February
22,
2012
Sterling Allan reports on his recent trip to South Africa to visit a company who
has developed a 5 kilowatt Fuel Free Generator that will be available beginning March for their existing customers.
Sterling will be getting a generator to test and use on his home from that first
batch of 200.
Before I left, many people were concerned for
my safety, wondering which direction from the airport I would be going in
Johannesburg. I think you can see from these photos of my hotel room that
they took very good care of me, as we were in an affluent, safe part of
town. I only took 17 photos, total, while in Johannesburg, so obviously I
wasn’t in “tourist” mode. It was all business, and very
enjoyable for me. (That last image is a glass sink.)
by Sterling
D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News
On February 11 and 12, I was able to witness a 5 kilowatt (enough
to power a home without central air conditioning, conservatively) fuel-free
generator in Johannesburg and to meet the inventor and some of the principle
players in helping him bring this technology to market.
As mentioned in my previous story on this matter, the South African company
invited me to come see the technology first-hand so that I would not be making a
statement along the lines of “they claim…”, or “if this is
real…”, but so that I would be able to speak from personal experience
after witnessing the technology in operation. They also offered to sell me a
unit that I could personally test, promising to refund the cost if it did not
perform as claimed.
I wish to thank all of you who stepped forward enthusiastically to donate
funds to make this trip and procurement possible. The plan is to ship me one of
the first 200 units.
The company, for now, wishes to remain off the radar. They don’t currently
have a website, but one is expected to be completed in about a month or so. They
plan to make a big splash soon. For now, interested parties (as a result of this
coverage), can reach
them through me. So in this coverage, I will only refer to them as the
“S. African Company”, and their product as the “FFG”, which
stands for Fuel-Free Generator.
Top Five
I do consider this technology to be a contender in our Top
5 Exotic Free Energy Technologies listing, due to its being close to market
with a substantial, reliable output that is competitively priced to be more
affordable than conventional energy sources, while producing no pollution, and
being ready for rapid deployment through the setting up of licensees worldwide.
I was very impressed with the personnel involved in the S. African company.
So many great technologies over the years have been hindered primarily by
unworkable inventors or teams that can’t work well together.
What I Saw
What I witnessed, along with three other scientists that I brought along —
all more qualified than myself — was a 5 kW unit powered by four batteries,
running for three hours continuous, driving a load of approximately 4 KW.
According to the amp-hour rating of those batteries (102 Ah each), without
being recharged from an external source, they should have lasted only 35 minutes
before running down completely, no longer able to power the system.
The load was roughly 4 kW, comprised of:
– a two-burner stove, each burner consuming 1 kW (rated power according to
manufacturer)
– a toaster that consumed 850 Watts (rated power)
– a pancake maker that consumes 1 kW (rated power)
– A 40-Watt fan (rated power)
The total output was as high as 5 kW, as long as the generator was turned at
3000 rpm, and there was sufficient load. (The generator only produces as much
power as is used). One time we plugged in more load than 5 kW and it caused the
system to shut down, as it should in that circumstance.
The system was comprised of a series-wound, brushed, DC motor (slightly
modified) powered by one bank of two 12-Volt, deep-cycle batteries (102 Ah) wired in series
for a 24-Volt output. The company says the back-EMF is harvested into a second,
identical battery bank, which is also wired in series. These two banks are
periodically cycled, trading places in the circuit, and the net charge stays
essentially the same, across both banks. The optimized cycling of power and
storing of the back-EMF are all controlled by a proprietary circuit board and
software developed by the inventor. The motor shaft is connected directly to the
shaft of the AC generator, which spins at 3,000 rpm to produce 5 kW of power at
50 Hz, 220-V.
There was no external power cord or fuel going to the system. They lifted the
table on which the system was housed, to show that no cords were run through the
legs into the floor to a hidden power source. It is a closed system as far as
physical devices are concerned.
We didn’t have a way to detect whether or not electromagnetic radiation might
be in use to power the system inductively or wirelessly; but we did see all
around the room as we entered through the first floor underneath the lab, and we
could see what was on the other side of three of the four walls, and we could
see the roof as we approached the building, which didn’t have anything on top of
it. The unit was in the middle of the room, maybe 15 feet away from the fourth
wall that we didn’t look on the other side of.
Data
Here is the data we collected from the third test we
ran:
Time
Bank 1 Volts
Bank 2 Volts
Frequency
“before”
24.82 V
24.27 V (.67?)
n.a.
11:52 am
24.82 V
23.82 V
—
11:58 am
24.82 V
23.75 V
49.87 Hz
12:07 pm
24.82 V
23.67 V
50.03 Hz
12:20 pm
24.82 V
23.66 V
50.02 Hz
12:33 pm
24.82 V
23.62 V
49.99 Hz
(lunch)
…
…
…
2:50 pm
24.82 V
23.08 V
50.03 Hz
The starting voltages of the individual batteries were less than 100%
charged: Bank 1: 12.4, 12.43; Bank 2: 12.25, 12.42. We did not take an end point
reading for the individual batteries (sorry for the oversight). At the time, I
was thinking we would be back again.
According to these data, it looks like Bank 1 was not harnessed, and that Bank 2
was the only one being drawn from. Also, one of the two batteries in Bank 2 was
not full at the start, but was discharged between 20-40 percent. With Lead Acid
batteries, most of the discharge takes place during the first 1-V drop. At the
end of three hours, Bank 2 was down nearly half a volt per 12-V battery
(averaging), so it was somewhere between 50-70% discharged (assuming a fully
charged battery starts at 12.6-12.9 VDC).
That analysis was made in hind sight, a few days later.
The company states: “The system is configured to swap between battery
banks when the driving bank has depreciated by 8 percent, as can be seen from
the tests, the driving bank dropped by only 4.9 percent.”
I look forward to being able to see accurate data collected over a long period
of time, showing individual battery voltages, current, and output energy
readings accurately recorded as well.
But I will maintain that while our 3-hour run could have been more rigorously
recorded, the basic principle does hold up: The system ran many times longer
than the amp-hour rating of the batteries would account for if they were the
sole source of power. Energy was showing up from somewhere else, or being
transformed in some new way.
From an energy conservation frame of reference, modern science would predict
that the batteries would do nothing but diminish. But there is something about
this configuration that apparently allows ubiquitous, inexhaustible free energy
“from the wheel work of nature”, as Telsa called it, to be harvested.
So the batteries did not drain nearly as fast, even though the system was
producing significant excess power.
The claim/objective is that when working as designed, the system will be able to
run continuously — for years — without the batteries dropping below a certain
level (e.g. below 70% fully charged). From what I saw, I would say that they are
on their way to meeting that objective, but they are not consistently there yet.
Began with a Failed Demonstration
The above description was the second test that was done for us on that
set-up. The first run didn’t turn out as planned.
The batteries diminished, the motor/generator slowed, and after 38 minutes it
stopped running. Note that according to lead acid battery specs, these batteries
were nearly fully discharged at the start of the test. I don’t know that the S.
African group understood or appreciated this attribute of batteries — that it
is not a linear relationship of voltage to power capacity.
Here are the data from that run:
Time
Bank 1 Volts
Bank 2 Volts
Frequency
10:40 (no load/start)
22.50 V
22.40 V
n.a.
10:41
22.57 V
17.51 V
—
10:44
22.64 V
14.98 V
—
10:47
22.73 V
11.17 V
—
11:05 (it switched)
13.14 V
12.04 V
—
11:09
12.67 V
11.37 V
—
11:17
11.62 V
10.50 V
40 Hz
Stopped after 38 minutes
No load
17.12 V
14.58 V
n.a.
You can imagine the feelings of “Oh no; another dud!” that I was
fighting as we watched this. But I should say that I was hopeful that the
problem, whatever it was, would be identified and resolved.
It turns out that the previous test they had run had been for a client that
had requested a control run that entailed running the system without the
inventor’s circuit, to see how long the system would go until it stopped. This
damaged two of the batteries. Running lead acid batteries to zero is not good
for them. Also, not all the batteries were fully charged at the beginning.
They replaced those batteries (including with one that wasn’t fully charged)
and then ran the test again, which gave the results I reported earlier.
40 kW Array
They also ran a 40 kW system for us that was set up the same way except with
a DC motor suitable to turn a 40 kW generator; and 16 batteries, comprised of 4
sets of batteries in parallel in place of a single set of batteries in the 5 kW set-up.
It wasn’t set up at the time for extended running, so we only saw that one
run for about 10 minutes. It wasn’t wired to the load bank (a ~$10,000+ piece of
equipment with resistive coils), and the shaft connection wasn’t properly
aligned. It was running without a load.
The other prototype size outputs apparently are available at their
manufacturing facility. They include:
- 5.5 kW single phase
- 8 kW single phase
- 12 kW 3 phase
- 16 kW 3 phase
- 40 kW 3 phase
- 42 kW 3 phase
Other Scientists that Accompanied Me
The three other scientists that came with me to this demonstration were
Johan, Keith, and Henry, all from Johannesburg.
Keith is an electronics technician with many years experience in all kinds of
gadgets. He wrote:
“I felt privileged to witness the future in person. I may be just a
certificated electronics technician, but with more than 40 years field
experience, I know enough to know that what I witnessed is no scam. I’m not
sure how this process actually works, but it is most definitely working. It’s
one thing to read about things like this, and most reports are ‘iffy’ to say
the least. To witness this in person and see that no extra power was being
added, and the unit keeps on going way beyond what the batteries are capable
of delivering, is completely mind blowing. The hairs on the back of my neck
are still tingling! Thank you so much for arranging for me to witness
this!”
Keith’s friend, Henry has a degree in electrical engineering with 25 years
experience in industrial electronic design, his specialty being electric motors
and generators. He was primarily the one making measurements, asking questions,
making observations, and, along with the rest of us, grinning at the end of the
day. To be fully satisfied, he would like to see a longer run, with more careful
measurement of the input and output, but he thought the device definitely looked
promising.
The S. Africa Team
As mentioned above, I was highly impressed with the S. African company’s
team.
The inventor is actually very socially functional and not so eccentric he is
impossible to work with — a phenomenon I’ve seen far too many times over the
years. Some of the best technologies are opposed the most by the inventor’s
inability to interact with those who seek to help.
The inventor has been successful as a technologist and manager for a large
company. He’s not the archetypal outcast of the fringe, as is often found in the
free energy sector.
He came up with this invention in a round-about way, not starting out with a
particular vision in mind. He was just tinkering, building a toy for his
daughter, making one modification after another, tweaking, optimizing, until he
ended up with design that powered his house for three weeks, which was when he
brought it to a financier, who then powered his office with it for three weeks.
The company is privately funded, so they are not looking for investment.
They also have a lot of patriotism toward S. Africa. They are proud of the
many milestone accomplishments of the country, and seem intent on having S.
Africa be honored once again by being the birthplace of this technology.
They hope to get the distinction of bringing the first exotic free energy
technology (of the home-power electricity variety) to the marketplace; and to be
able to leverage the branding opportunities that will be associated with that.
And after they have successfully launched the 5 kW FFG into the market, they
would like to expand into a role of helping to incubate new breakthrough energy
technologies — to become the Siemens of Free Energy or of affordable
distributed power.
No Photos
One point of frustration for me was that I wasn’t permitted to take any
photos of any of the devices. Their reason wasn’t for protection of proprietary
information, because a photo wouldn’t divulge such. Rather, their reason had to
do with image. They want the first images the public sees to be professionally
done, in order to present a good first impression.
I disagree. I think their set-up looked fine. Compared to most of what I’m
used to seeing in this sector, their equipment looked great, especially their 40
kW system.
Plans for Roll-out
The company plans to focus at first on producing the 5 kW system. They have
several customers lined up, including some multi-national companies with strong
name recognition, who will be testing their first 200 units built, set to begin
in March. They will continue to produce 200 units/month for the S. African
market, increasing this to 500/month by the end of the year.
They showed us a cabinet with 200 circuits they have prepared to go into
those first 200 units. The 5 kW system we were observing was actually a test
system to make sure each of those circuits has been built properly.
After the customers have run those first units for thirty days, 1) they will
purchase them if they are satisfied with their performance, and 2) they will
publish a report of the performance of these devices, to be included in their
promotional material, both for potential licensees (more detailed) and for the
public (simplified).
If the outcomes of those tests are sufficiently positive, then the company
will do a big press conference or launch event to announce the product to the
world.
After the 5 kW system is proven, then the company will next focus on rolling
out larger sizes.
Skipping Alpha Testing
This method of having the first customers be the ones to test the first
manufactured units is not the way a product is normally rolled out commercially.
Usually, the first testing of the device intended for market is done in-house
(alpha testing). Only after thousands of hours of testing and receiving
certifications, followed by extensive beta testing (by external parties in
real-world environments) would the product be introduced to customers. Alpha
testing would include stress tests under varying situations including heat,
cold, vibration, running to destruction, determining optimums and margins; as
well as toxicity and interference tests to show the device operation doesn’t
impact human health or electronics.
However, remember that this FFG system uses primarily off-the-shelf
components that have already been run through the rigors of such tests.
The alternator, for example, will already have such testing, certifications,
and approvals. As long as it is being turned at its rated speed, it will produce
its rated output, whether the source of the rotating torque is hydro, wind,
diesel generator, etc. A home warranty or insurance adjuster should only be
concerned with the output of the alternator, which has the necessary
credentials. So (I would think) the classification of this unit would be in the
same group as a genset, which already has the needed UL or CE ratings.
Customers can buy off-the-shelf grid-tie systems that will sync the generator
up with the local grid power, with automatic shut-off, in the case of a grid
power failure, so that linemen are not jeopardized by the power coming from the
device. A grid tie would be best, since the unit can puts out a constant 5 kW,
and with net metering, most homes would come out well ahead at the end of the
month; thus speeding up the payback time, in those states where net metering
allows for payback for net excess energy generation from the customer’s side.
What does this do to the Batteries?
One downside to minimizing a rigorous alpha-testing approach, as I see it, is
that the company has not yet been able to study long-term performance results
for the system.
The longest it has been run in one setting has been three weeks: once when
powering the inventor’s home; and once when powering the financier’s office —
both for three weeks.
Alex Xanthoulis, CEO of Defkalion, said that he saw a system similar to this
1.5 years ago at a university in Greece. It worked short-term, but it hammered
the batteries, so they only lasted a few days. Since the South African company
has far exceeded that, it is probably safe to say that their circuitry is
different, and doesn’t have as much, if any, of a detrimental effect on the
batteries.
Licensing Opportunity
The S. African company plans to have each country have their own
manufacturing and distribution network, rather than have one primary
manufacturer.
The licensee task will entail sourcing the off-the-shelf batteries, DC motor
and AC generator (or other end applications for capturing that power from the DC
motor shaft, such as a pump); manufacturing the cabinet to house the system;
assembling the systems, and distributing them to customers; and servicing the
customers.
However, one very important point is that in every case, the licensee will
purchase the control system for each unit from the S. African company. That is
both to protect the intellectual property and to provide a built-in way for them
to get a royalty on each unit sold.
The up-front licensing fee is likely to be low, like a deposit or earnest
payment on a property offer. The main revenue for the S. African company will be
from sales of the control circuit, which only they will manufacture, containing
the proprietary elements.
Potential Licensee Attributes
Usually, when a company talks about licensing a technology, they have all the
alpha and beta testing done, with reams of data and spec sheets about the
device(s) to be licensed.
In the case of the S. African company, though, potential groups coming in now
to license will be early players, and will need to have a different threshold of
willingness to assume risk, withstand skepticism, work through bugs, etc.
Potential licensees will need to be able to provide evidence of their
capability to perform functions such as:
- Financial means to capitalize the project (capital expenses will not be
that high, compared to other energy device manufacturing scenarios). - Ability to source the best, most affordable, reliable, compatible
off-the-shelf components. - Ability to run installation, maintenance, repair, and other support
services. - Ability to properly market the device.
- Proper motivation: humanitarian, not greed-based.
- Ability to put up with and overcome skepticism, criticism, rudeness, and
even overt suppression tactics.
Metamorphosis Rather than Usurpation
The arising of this and other exotic free energy technologies that are both
clean and have the potential to render obsolete many energy modalities, might
not go over well with those that are already involved in those sectors.
The S. African company hopes to make this transition as minimally disruptive
as possible, while still addressing the planet’s need for affordable, clean,
distributed power, which empowers the individual while rendering obsolete the
corrupt powers that be. Good riddance to the latter, but there are many sectors
that aren’t corrupt which could also be negatively impacted.
In order to minimize this collateral damage, the S. African company will seek
to work with those companies to let them be part of this opportunity, rather
than be put out of business by it.
Postscript
Just a quick note on the side.
Thanks again for the donations that made all this trip and more possible. You
people are awesome. Not one person who donated asked for their money back, even
though there was a lot of criticism about how long it took me to get this report
up. I will gladly refund any such requests. I promise to put those funds to good
use.
I’ve put this technology up in #1 position in our Top 5, but I should say that
they are neck-in-neck with Defkalion. It’s close to a tie for first, being very
close in terms of price point, closeness to market, quality of team, cleanness
of product.
For you naysayers who immediately jump to the conclusion that anything involving
“free energy” must be bogus or fraudulent, bear in mind that this
company is not seeking money. In fact they spurn any such inquiries.
p.p.s. Whoa…
The company sent the following on February 22, 2012 3:48 PM [MST], about 6 hours after
we first posted the above story:
I appreciate your enthusiasm but need to pull the reins back a bit. I mentioned when you were here that we first want to trial with the
corporates [the companies they have in line presently]. This process needs to go ahead now and we will entertain licensees thereafter so let’s hold off on the discussions with potential guys for now as we are being flooded and I don’t want to distract from our strategy…..
And on February 28, 2012 12:45 AM [MST], in response to my email titled
“how do I keep up?”, describing how difficult it has been for me to
stay on top of the flood of emails I’ve been receiving, they wrote:
“Awesome…now imagine if we had launched it yet officially, you will have
to have a large staff compliment just to answer them. I think we should tell the
guys to hold off for now as the flood gates have opened for product that
we are still testing and have not commercialized yet. We will not
adopt a first come first serve mentality…“We have started our own internal alpha testing as such, to get the
certification process going. So we will be going for some destructive testing
processes as well before we actually go into beta. This process will take some
time, so we have delayed the project slightly, as we feel that some proper data
might help our cause first.”
# # #
This story is also published at BeforeItsNews
and Examiner.
What You Can Do
- Pass this on to your friends and favorite news sources.
- http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/FFG_news/join
– newsletter for keeping updated on major developments. Or you can
subscribe by sending an email to: [email protected]
then respond to the confirmation email. (Commenced February 28, 2012) - Click to tweet: http://clicktotweet.com/VwzdW
- If you are an early adopter and entrepreneur, consider licensing the
technology for your region of the planet. You can contact them through
me. Please briefly describe your abilities and intentions. - Unless you live in S. Africa, you can’t order a unit until
there is a licensee set up for manufacturing and distribution in your
region. - Donate to PES Network
to help us keep this news and directory and networking service going. - Subscribe to our newsletter
to stay abreast of the latest, greatest developments in the free energy
sector. - The company is not looking for investment.
See also
Resources at PESWiki.com
- Directory:Electromagnetic
- Top_5_Exotic_Free_Energy_Technologies
- Directory:Best_Exotic_Clean_Energy_Technologies
- More
stories by Sterling D. Allan
- PESN (Pure Energy Systems News)
–
Feature stories on cutting-edge, clean energy technology. - Free Energy News (.com)
– Daily cutting-edge, clean energy technology news from around the world - PESWiki Latest –
Newest feature pages in the publicly-editable energy directory. - This Week in Free
Energy™ – Ten-minute recap each Sunday, 7:50 – 8:00 pm Mountain. - Free
Energy Now (.net) – in-depth interviews
Page composed by Sterling
D. Allan
Last updated February 29, 2012
visits on this page
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
