It is amazing, really, that an obvious cause and effect can play out right in front of everyone’s eyes and yet somehow, the greater portion of government officials end up surprised by it? I’m talking about the cause (berating, humiliating parents who choose not to vaccinate their children) and the effect (those same parents who just stop telling anyone about their medical decision). It should be rather obvious that if you create an environment of hostility for people who choose to exercise a human right not to vaccinate their children, you could potentially alienate them and cause them to eventually become rather withdrawn.

However in Australia, government officials and health officials are somehow surprised that this has begun to occur in their country. So surprised that they had to carry out a research study to confirm it was actually happening, according to BorderMail.

Edith Cowan University researchers interviewed a group of parents from an anti-vaccination cluster area about their reasons for not immunising their children.

All the parents said they hadn’t told their extended family and friends that their children weren’t vaccinated.

“They don’t want the confrontation, they’re tired of people questioning their choices, and they don’t want to justify their decision, so they just don’t tell people,” researcher Bronwyn Harman said, noting it was a very polarising and emotive issue.

“This is a huge problem if Australia-wide we’ve got a group of people choosing not to vaccinate their children and they’re not telling people. We need to stop vilifying these people so they are able to identify themselves so we don’t put people who do choose to vaccinate at risk.”

The anti-vaccination parents were very mistrustful of the government and doctors, suspecting that they were in the pocket of the pharmaceutical companies. “They [question] if they can believe everything they’re being told,” Dr Harman said. “They think the government in particular, and doctors, are trying to scare people into vaccinating their kids.”

The first baffling aspect of this excerpt is that a study was required in order for the government to grasp that if you stomp all over people for their beliefs, they might start hiding from you. They might stop communicating with you because you have created a hostile environment embedded deep in dogmatic concepts which aren’t flexible in the least. You don’t want a roundtable discussion, you don’t want to meet in the middle, you want to cull out those who don’t think like you do and humiliate them, legislate them and jail them. Your fascist regime hiding under the guise of free will and choice isn’t fooling anyone.


Comment: The following articles carried back in January 2015 are just two examples of Australia’s rising medical fascism and the country’s failure to even debate the topic of vaccinations:

The concerted effort to stop Tenpenny from speaking claims that this isn’t about free speech, but an endangerment to public health. There is also a pattern of fear that the vulnerable, naive, confused or uneducated parents might accidentally believe Tenpenny’s words against their will, act on it and babies will die. That somehow the public needs protection from her words. There are also slurs of half-baked, crazy, fundamentalist, dangerous, extremist, and cult leader. For taking the view that vaccines cause harm and attempting to speak in Australia, Tenpenny gets multiple slam pieces in the press like Australia’s Daily Telegraph, a “Stop Sherri Tenpenny from entering Australia” Facebook page, blog posts like that of “Reasonable Hank,” not one petition to refuse her visa, but two, and a hashtag: #StopTenpenny.

Our words, voice, and opinions are our birth right and are protected. Free speech is not a luxury and it is certainly not handed down to us from a government. In Australia and ramping up quickly in the United States, it seems that some speech is freer than others.

Long-time expert and vaccine educatorDr. Sherry Tenpenny has publicly announced that she has cancelled speaking appearances scheduled for Brisbane, Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne and Gold Coast. The reason was due to pro-vaccine extremists repeatedly calling for bomb threats and violence against venue owners and their families in some cities originally scheduled for the healthy living seminars…

Sadly, the mainstream media has chosen to largely ignore important evidence from CDC whistleblower data, vaccine inserts, pleas of parents with autistic children, and public backlash. Instead, they are using the recent vaccine controversy to double-down and seemingly side with the ones threatening violence against Dr. Tenpenny in Australia by saying “Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail“. This according to USA Today columnist Alex Berezow.

The second important portion we should pay attention to here is that this study is really intended to help the government “identify” those who choose not to vaccinate their children. The actual concern here is not that they’ve alienated a portion of society, rather, that they’ve caused people to hide from them. Now they want to find them. Remember when Jews hid from Nazis? Of course, they hid from Nazis. But Nazis became frustrated and wanted them identified. So they found ways to identify them. What’s all that different in this case? The fact is that this is overly transparent in terms of agenda. All you are saying here is that silence is a threat and that you need to find a way to solve it. That type of rhetoric can in no way be anything other than an attempt to identify groups of people based on their beliefs. What if we were worried about identifying atheists in the United States? Why would we do that? There is no good reason we’d ever do that and this is unquestionably the same thing.

What are the options from here? Will Australian people eventually be subjected to forms when they get a driver license? Will health officials knock on their doors and ask for vaccine cards? The future is not looking good for anyone when it comes to medical freedom. I doubt highly this “research” is for any philanthropic reasons or to bridge the gap between those who want vaccines and those who want the choice to refuse a vaccine.