Shell executive caught viewing child porn at home when he accidentally sent vile images to be printed at oil giant’s UK HQ

By
Catherine Eade

07:44 EST, 17 September 2012


|

11:33 EST, 17 September 2012

Anthony Sturman was caught downloading child porn when he printed off images of child abuse using a work printer

A senior manager at oil giant Shell was caught downloading indecent images of children at home when he mistakenly tried to print out some pages on his work printer, a court has heard.

Anthony Sturman, 59, sent six pages containing indecent material to a printer at the Waterloo headquarters of Shell UK, where he had worked for 15 years.

Sturman was viewing child porn at his country home in Kent when he pressed the print button. His PC was linked to his work system, so the images were produced at his office.

Seven of the images printed were categorised at level four, the second highest level of abuse.

A horrified colleague discovered the images when she unclogged a jammed printer on the 18th floor at the Shell Centre in Waterloo on June 28 last year.

There were 42 indecent images across six pieces of paper, all in thumbnail size, Inner London Crown Court heard.

Darren Ponds, prosecuting, said Ruth Elliott, a colleague at Shell, had discovered the images.

‘A jam had occurred and when that jam was fixed the backed up items began to print. A number of pages of indecent images of children were printed.’

Examination of the data from the printer revealed the items had come from Sturman’s computer and he was arrested two days later.

Yogain Chandarana, defending, said Sturman had destroyed the life he had built for himself.

‘He has actively sought treatment for himself since his arrest 18 months ago,’ he said. ‘He has laid out his soul in front of probation officers.’

‘Clearly though, he did not intend to produce these images on a work printer.

‘He has caused a complete destruction of the life he had built…because of his behaviour.’

Judge Lindsay Burns sentenced Sturman to eight months in prison, suspended for two years, and ordered him to take part in a sex offenders programme.

‘You do not pose any significant risk, and the chances of you re-offending are at the lowest level,’ he said.

The Shell HQ on London’s South Bank was where the printed images were discovered by a Shell colleague

‘The level of intention in this case sets this apart from other, far more serious cases.

‘I have to say that the view you have taken, rather unhappily, is rare in the courts, with other offenders like you.

‘You have shown considerable remorse and understanding for what you have done.’

Sturman, of Faversham, Kent, admitted one count of producing indecent images of children.
He will also have to sign onto the sex offenders’ register.

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

Pathetic sentencing yet again. Judges used to be a respected part of civilisation, now they are part of its disintegration and treated with contempt.

Mark
,

manchester, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:51

Pathetic sentencing yet again. Judges used to be a respected part of civilisation, now they are part of its disintegration and treated with contempt.

Mark
,

manchester, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:51

What about that poor woman who had to see those vile images he printed out? Not to mention those poor children in the images and this man’s family and friends. He has hurt so many people.

pink64
,

Smalltown, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:48

Rubbish – he’s the lowest level. He would have probably went on to more sicker images if he wasn’t caught. DISGUSTING, VILE PIG! Gross!!

honeybunny1008
,

Edinburgh, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:43

This man is clearly sick in the head but we should really be focussing attention on locating the sicker individuals who took the pictures in the first place and then put them on the Net.

Brian
,

Wellingborough,
17/9/2012 19:30

he man is sick in the head
– mr woo, glasgow, United Kingdom, 17/9/2012 18:41…………….You get the prize for stating the obvious.

GT
,

E. Yorkshire,
17/9/2012 19:26

Lock ’em all up and throw away the keys.

Worn Out
,

Skid Row, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:13

Eight months? He didn’t get 8 months…..it was suspended for 2 years, meaning no jail time!!!!

bugsy
,

horsham,
17/9/2012 19:12

Why are people such sickos? Seriously, they need help. I cannot believe these guys..and also the women involved too. Tip of the iceberg…

robyn
,

usa,
17/9/2012 19:12

The vile man who should have received a few years in prison. The legal system needs to be revamped to ensure that anyone who views such horrible abuse of inncent children be dealt a harsh sentence.

KittyKat
,

Over the Rainbow…,
17/9/2012 18:59

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Views: 0

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Shell executive caught viewing child porn at home when he accidentally sent vile images to be printed at oil giant’s UK HQ

By
Catherine Eade

07:44 EST, 17 September 2012


|

11:33 EST, 17 September 2012

Anthony Sturman was caught downloading child porn when he printed off images of child abuse using a work printer

A senior manager at oil giant Shell was caught downloading indecent images of children at home when he mistakenly tried to print out some pages on his work printer, a court has heard.

Anthony Sturman, 59, sent six pages containing indecent material to a printer at the Waterloo headquarters of Shell UK, where he had worked for 15 years.

Sturman was viewing child porn at his country home in Kent when he pressed the print button. His PC was linked to his work system, so the images were produced at his office.

Seven of the images printed were categorised at level four, the second highest level of abuse.

A horrified colleague discovered the images when she unclogged a jammed printer on the 18th floor at the Shell Centre in Waterloo on June 28 last year.

There were 42 indecent images across six pieces of paper, all in thumbnail size, Inner London Crown Court heard.

Darren Ponds, prosecuting, said Ruth Elliott, a colleague at Shell, had discovered the images.

‘A jam had occurred and when that jam was fixed the backed up items began to print. A number of pages of indecent images of children were printed.’

Examination of the data from the printer revealed the items had come from Sturman’s computer and he was arrested two days later.

Yogain Chandarana, defending, said Sturman had destroyed the life he had built for himself.

‘He has actively sought treatment for himself since his arrest 18 months ago,’ he said. ‘He has laid out his soul in front of probation officers.’

‘Clearly though, he did not intend to produce these images on a work printer.

‘He has caused a complete destruction of the life he had built…because of his behaviour.’

Judge Lindsay Burns sentenced Sturman to eight months in prison, suspended for two years, and ordered him to take part in a sex offenders programme.

‘You do not pose any significant risk, and the chances of you re-offending are at the lowest level,’ he said.

The Shell HQ on London’s South Bank was where the printed images were discovered by a Shell colleague

‘The level of intention in this case sets this apart from other, far more serious cases.

‘I have to say that the view you have taken, rather unhappily, is rare in the courts, with other offenders like you.

‘You have shown considerable remorse and understanding for what you have done.’

Sturman, of Faversham, Kent, admitted one count of producing indecent images of children.
He will also have to sign onto the sex offenders’ register.

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

Pathetic sentencing yet again. Judges used to be a respected part of civilisation, now they are part of its disintegration and treated with contempt.

Mark
,

manchester, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:51

Pathetic sentencing yet again. Judges used to be a respected part of civilisation, now they are part of its disintegration and treated with contempt.

Mark
,

manchester, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:51

What about that poor woman who had to see those vile images he printed out? Not to mention those poor children in the images and this man’s family and friends. He has hurt so many people.

pink64
,

Smalltown, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:48

Rubbish – he’s the lowest level. He would have probably went on to more sicker images if he wasn’t caught. DISGUSTING, VILE PIG! Gross!!

honeybunny1008
,

Edinburgh, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:43

This man is clearly sick in the head but we should really be focussing attention on locating the sicker individuals who took the pictures in the first place and then put them on the Net.

Brian
,

Wellingborough,
17/9/2012 19:30

he man is sick in the head
– mr woo, glasgow, United Kingdom, 17/9/2012 18:41…………….You get the prize for stating the obvious.

GT
,

E. Yorkshire,
17/9/2012 19:26

Lock ’em all up and throw away the keys.

Worn Out
,

Skid Row, United Kingdom,
17/9/2012 19:13

Eight months? He didn’t get 8 months…..it was suspended for 2 years, meaning no jail time!!!!

bugsy
,

horsham,
17/9/2012 19:12

Why are people such sickos? Seriously, they need help. I cannot believe these guys..and also the women involved too. Tip of the iceberg…

robyn
,

usa,
17/9/2012 19:12

The vile man who should have received a few years in prison. The legal system needs to be revamped to ensure that anyone who views such horrible abuse of inncent children be dealt a harsh sentence.

KittyKat
,

Over the Rainbow…,
17/9/2012 18:59

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Views: 0

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes