Resisting Defamation as an Act of War – Part 2

November 10th, 2015

Awake Goy

Acts of war surround us, and one cluster is the name-calling that affects weak-minded white Americans and their children. Hate speech can be rebutted by attacks back at the speakers, writers, and institutions which promote the anti-white narrative, claim the supremacist right to name and label us, and learn to overcome the fear of telling an alternative story, one than encourages us and strengthens our resolve. Two examples from our 2008 files are at the end of this piece so readers can see how this effort works so well.

The Right To Name Oneself

Almost all wars for independence and de-colonialization (like ours) commence with fights to regain control over one’s own naming, labeling, defining, and describing. Jewish Americans did it. African Americans Did It. Muslim Americans did it. American Indians did it. Asian Americans did it. Hispanic Americans did it.
Only the diverse white American peoples don’t recognize the importance of their name to a decent sense of self-respect. No revolution will start over a matter of larger importance in the absence of concerns about naming and labeling as a first step.

The right to name oneself is absolute and rejects every slur, every negative stereotype, and every caricature spoken or written about us, along with every denial of our right to name and label ourselves. US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy even established it as a constitutional right for all Americans to “define and express their identity.” His position was a key part of the 1991 Planned Parenthood ruling:

At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.

Remember, if they are naming you, they are defaming you. Also remember, it is not the nature of the slur we protest, it is the act of naming we protest. Never get involved in the actual nature of the slur, it is the act of naming that is supremacist and frequently bigoted, hateful, and vicious.

Academicians frequently consider naming the other as acts of reductionism and de-humanization.

Getting Started To Attack Back

Become a one-person “white ADL” in your community. Familiarize yourself with one newspaper or electronic medium, more than one is too much to start with. Pick the one you want to monitor and admonish.

Learn all about its Internet web site which usually contains contact information for key personnel at the paper or electronic medium. Collect 20 to 40 names, titles, and email addresses from that site, and save them in a location on your computer where you will have easy access.

Don’t try to do everything at once, pick just one element of the dominant media culture to focus on. Be patient with yourself when setting up your educationally admonishment operation.

Pick One or Two Extra Email Identities

It isn’t a matter of hiding, it is that once your name is learned as a scold and critic, the “delete” key will be applied right away. A variety of email identities is a way to ease the message into the awareness of the recipients. Another way is to reduce your message to a slogan for use in the subject line which can brand its message on the eyeballs of recipients.

Sloganizing Subject Lines Is An Art Form

If your message is that white people are diverse (because the writer said “typical whites” or “a white”), then the writer is trying to wrap us in an undifferentiated blob of humanity to make it easy to blame us as a collective identical in all aspects. A slogan might be “Only Bigots Deny White Diversity” for the subject line, with a somewhat longer text in the message.

Or if the article lists every other demographic with “American” in the label but not the diverse white Americans, a slogan might be “Haters Claim White Americans Are Not Americans.” And so on. The hard part is keeping it short.

Monitor Your Choice

Locate hate speech and labeling by paying special attention to articles about multiracialism, multiculturalism, ethnicity, race, demographics, racial and other kinds of diversity, the “firsts,” and race-based comparisons like graduation rates, health care, technology usage, military service, and life expectancies.

Most writers of stories like these are devoted haters and will claim the supremacist and oppressive right to name and label us whenever possible. In other words, they are easy pickings because they have begun to be lazy. No one has taught them to stop it … that’s where you come in. “Stop the hate” is the message to send.

Backlash

Be prepared for a backlash. These seem to have three steps. First comes mockery, more name-calling, deception, and laughter. Second comes anger and more name-calling, Third comes acceptance and more name-calling. Remember that the authors of the hate campaigns against our children have had centuries of experience in handing out hate speech, but very little experiencing getting criticism.

Send That Painful & Educational Shock

Focus on sending a painful, but short, shock by email. The first key principle is to telegraph the message in the subject line so even if the recipient deletes it without opening, he or she still get the message.

The second key principle is to keep it short…very short. If length is called for, use little headnotes to separate the paragraphs and make it easy for the educationally-challenged haters to realize that they have been chastised.

The third key principle is to make very few email addresses visible, but to include lots of blind copies. Anyone receiving an email with 40 visible recipients will pay it little heed, but someone receiving an email with just a visible copy to his or her editor, and then finding out over the day at the water cooler that everyone they know received a blind copy can be quite painful and educational for the writer.

Avoid suits for slander by using “alleged” or “in my opinion” when appropriate. It won’t hurt your message.

Save a copy of your email message along with any response to your message. Don’t debate whether a word is a slur, for example, after making your initial argument. Let it drop and message the defamers again when they do some slurring and smearing again.

Don’t get sidetracked by allegations that the person speaking or quoted was also one of the diverse white Americans so that makes it okay. Just ignore that claim as a whimsical puff-of-air. Those who say this have been brain-washed and don’t understand they are self-hating. I wouldn’t call them traitors, just ignorant which is what they usually are.

Easy Themes To Promote

We have selected certain themes in administrating painful shocks to defamers. Here are some fish in the barrel.

1) Emphasize that their claim to have the right to name the diverse white Americans is based on their claim to supremacy. It’s almost as bad as calling them racist, but it is definitely true and cannot be contradicted.

2) Emphasize that white American peoples are ethnically diverse. It is true, it fits with the language of our era, and it contradicts the unvarying message by the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture that white Americans are not diverse. Call writers and speakers deniers and bigots who refuse to recognize white diversity.

3) Emphasize that white Americans are Americans. If you read news stories, you will note that we have African Americans, Mexican Americans, American Indians, and Asian Americans, but the diverse white peoples in America are never called Americans. The anti-white bigots who prize the suffix “American” for their favorite demographics are determined to strip it from the diverse white American peoples.

4) Above all, the defamers promote the anti-white narrative, and need to be told and scolded.

5) Never attack a demographic group; attack individual writers, editors, publishers, TV stations, or politicians. The temptation to target whole demographic groups leads to your downfall. Remember Alinsky said to personalize complaints, and he was right. Your target is a person or institution, not an entire demographic.

Some Sample Letters

The two sample letters are examples of ways to integrate these ideas into your educational shock therapy for defamers.

==========

To: WaPo editorial board (open copies) & 15 WaPo writers (blind copies)
CC: [email protected]
Sent: March 17, 2008

Subject: Balz Hates White Men

The article by Dan Balz of the Washington Post that the San Jose Mercury News published today (3/17/08, page 4A) was remarkably vicious. African American voters and the diverse white American women voters are discussed in terms of their preferences, but white American men voters were hatefully discussed in terms of their alleged bigotry and prejudice:

“The results in Ohio in particular raised questions about whether Obama can attract support from this crucial demographic (diverse white American men voters). They also brought to the forefront the question of whether racial prejudice would be a barrier to his candidacy…if he becomes the Democratic nominee.”

We protest your campaign to smear the diverse white Euro-American men voters with your witch’s brew of hate. Stop it.

Name of Sender

==========

To: William Dean Singleton, CEO, & 26 writers

Sent: April 24, 2008
Subject: Righteous Gentile, Evil Gentiles

We were astonished to see your editorial staff at the San Jose Mercury News embrace “righteous gentile” in its editorial section yesterday (4/23/08, p. 13A).

Gentile

Using the label gentile is a claim of supremacy by those claiming the right to label the members of another group with this hate label. The term gentile actively suppresses 98% of the diversity around the world into identical clones of each other. Stop it.

Righteous

The term righteous is a bizarre attempt to label as unrighteous or evil everyone in the world who has not been selected for special righteous recognition. Quit validating this hate label. Stop it.

Signed

==========

Consequences Of Inaction

The best summary of the consequences of inaction in matters like these came from the pen of Sultan Mehmet commenting on the surrender of Byzantium in 1453, just 39 years before Columbus sent sail: