Power Point on Weather Modification and Advanced Weapons Technology

November 11th, 2014

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

Al Gore Says the Science in Global Warming is Settled

WEATHER MODIFICATION
Test Technology Symposium ‘97
Advanced Weapon/Instrumentation Technologies
John Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory – PDF

_________________________________________________

We must now wake up to consider that weather weapons are being used as global extortion to convince populations they must pay a carbon tax to keep the climate under control.

_________________________________________________

Phillips Power Point Presentation (PDF)

______________________________________________

The promotion of CO2 as the cause for Global Warming and the development of the National Climate Modification and weather Weapons Programs began virtually at the same time in the early 1960’s.

The covert program of jet aerosol climate modification began most intensely in the early 1990’s and coincided with the IPCC and Al Gore’s scare tactics that warned of rising sea levels if Global Warming passes the tipping point.

While complaints of massive aerosol geoengineering and climate modification operations were noted by citizens and ignored by Congress, the IPCC and international actions on climate change were ramping up.

While ignoring the military’s climate modification program in plain sight, the IPCC and Al Gore held sessions on the dangers of climate change with suggestions that a global carbon tax could fix the CO2 problem.

1964 Cartoon on Tyros Satellite Weather modification

A cartoon from the September, 1964 edition of the official Weather Bureau employee magazine, “TOPICS”, reveals ambition to control the weather in addition to tracking it.

TOPICS, the official Weather Bureau employee magazine,

1990: HAARP Ionospheric Heater Online
1990-1992: Citizen Complaints of sudden increase in frequency of persistent jet contrails nicknamed “chemtrails”
1992: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, entering into force 21 March 1994.
1995: The term “preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system” (also called avoiding dangerous climate change) first appeared in a policy document of a governmental organization, the IPCC’s Second Assessment Report: Climate Change 1995.

Neither the media or climate scientists asked if the military’s program could be contributing to climate change – even while public domain documents confirmed that “owning the weather” is a well documented military objective.

The evidence is robust that many storms and hurricanes since 2000 have been manipulated with massive deployments of geoengineering aerosols in combination with probable involvement of electromagnetic climate weapons.

We must now wake up to consider that weather weapons are being used as global extortion to convince populations they must pay a carbon tax to keep the climate under control.

Phillips Laboratory was a research and development organization operated by the United States Air Force Materiel Command. In 1997, the Laboratory was merged into the Air Force Research Laboratory as the Space Vehicles and Directed Energy Directorates. It was located at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Laboratory was named after Gen Samuel C. Phillips, a former Director of the Apollo Manned Lunar Landing Project.[1]

Air Force Space Command – SPACE AND MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER
The Space and Missile Systems Center, a subordinate unit of the Air Force Space Command at Peterson Air Force Base, Colo., is the center of technical excellence for researching, developing and purchasing military space systems. The center is also responsible for on-orbit, check-out testing, sustainment and maintenance of military satellite constellations and other Department of Defense space systems. The center is located at Los Angeles Air Force Base in El Segundo, Calif. – Major units, staff directorates and programs include: Military Satellite Communication Systems Wing
Plans for, acquires and sustains space-enabled, global communications capabilities to support national objectives.

Air Force Material Command
Note: AFMC is currently restructuring from 12 to five centers. This factsheet will be updated by mid-August 2012. With headquarters at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Air Force Materiel Command is a major command created July 1, 1992. The command conducts research, development, test and evaluation, and provides acquisition management services and logistics support necessary to keep Air Force weapon systems ready for war. Mission: Deliver war-winning: Technology , Acquisition, Test, Sustainment, expeditionary capabilities to the warfighter

Historical timeline of climate change politics

1969, on Initiative of US President Richard Nixon, NATO tried to establish a third civil column and planned to establish itself as a hub of research and initiatives in the civil region, especially on environmental topics.[6] Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Nixons NATO delegate for the topic[6] named Acid Rain and the Greenhouse effect as suitable international challenges to be dealt by NATO. NATO had suitable expertise in the field, experience with international research coordination and a direct access to governments.[6] After an enthusiastic start on authority level, the German government reacted sceptical.[6] The initiative was seen as an American attempt[6] to regain international terrain after the lost Vietnam War. The topics and the internal coordination and preparation effort however gained momentum in civil conferences and institutions in Germany and beyond during the Brandt government.[6]
1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment,[6] leading role of Nobel Prize winner Willy Brandt and Olof Palme,[19] Germany saw enhanced international research cooperation on the Greenhouse topic as necessary[6]
1978 Brandt Report, the greenhouse effect dealt with in the energy section[20]
1979: First World Climate Conference [21]
1987: Brundtland Report[20]
1987: Montreal Protocol on restricting ozone layer-damaging CFCs demonstrates the possibility of coordinated international action on global environmental issues.
1988: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change set up to coordinate scientific research, by two United Nations organizations, the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to assess the “risk of human-induced climate change”.
1990: HAARP Ionospheric Heater Online
1990-1992: Citizen Complaints of sudden increase in frequency of persistent jet contrails nicknamed “chemtrails”
1992: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, entering into force 21 March 1994
1995: The term preventing dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system (also called avoiding dangerous climate change) first appeared in a policy document of a governmental organization, the IPCC’s Second Assessment Report: Climate Change 1995.[22]
1996: European Union adopts target of a maximum 2°C rise in average global temperature
25 June 1997: U.S. Senate passes Byrd–Hagel Resolution rejecting Kyoto without more commitments from developing countries [23]
1997: Kyoto Protocol agreed
2001: George W. Bush withdraws from the Kyoto negotiations
2005, 2/16: Kyoto Protocol comes into force (not including the US or Australia)
2005: first carbon emissions trading scheme (EU) implemented
July 2005: 31st G8 summit has climate change on the agenda, but makes relatively little concrete progress
November/December 2005: United Nations Climate Change Conference; the first meeting of the Parties of the Kyoto Protocol, alongside the 11th Conference of the Parties (COP11), to plan further measures for 2008–2012 and beyond.
July 19, 2006: In California, Gov. Schwarzenegger proposed forming the Climate Action Board, a new, centralized authority under his direct control that would be responsible for implementing one of the nation’s most far-reaching initiatives to curb global warming. California ranks 12th in the world in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, however its regulatory actions tend to have far-reaching effects throughout the U.S.[24]
October 30, 2006: The Stern Review is published. It is the first comprehensive contribution to the global warming debate by an economist and its conclusions lead to the promise of urgent action by the UK government to further curb Europe’s CO2 emissions and engage other countries to do so. It discusses the consequences of climate change, mitigation measures to prevent it, possible adaptation measures to deal with its consequences, and prospects for international cooperation.
June 26, 2009: U.S. House of Representatives passes the American Clean Energy and Security Act, the “first time either house of Congress had approved a bill meant to curb the heat-trapping gases scientists have linked to climate change.”[25]