Popular lipsticks contain lead, according to a new FDA study

March 3rd, 2012

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

By Mikaela Conley | ABCNews.com

Beware of lipstick-stained lips before puckering up this Valentines Day. They could be covered in lead.

Reuters first reported that a new study conducted by the FDA found that 400 lipsticks on the market tested positive for lead, according to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, a coalition that advocates for safer cosmetics and hygiene products.

Maybelline Color Sensation by LOreal USA was the worst-offending lipstick of the group tested, the Campaign said. It contained more than 275 times the amount of lead that was found in the least-contaminated product.

Childrens products in the U.S. cannot contain more than 100 parts per million of lead. The highest offending lipstick contained 7.19 parts per million, the group said.

Oddly, the least contaminated was also the least expensive: Wet Wild Mega Mixers Lip Balm. This just shows that cost is not a factor in lead levels, said Stacy Malkan, co-founder of Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.

“There is no safe level of lead exposure,” Malkan told ABCNews.com. “It builds up in the body over time. A little bit every day is adding up and staying with you.”

Malkan said women use an average of 12 cosmetic and hygiene products per day.

Lead is a poisonous metal, and it was banned from paint products in the U.S. in 1978. The element is particularly dangerous to young children because it can cause blood and brain disorders in developing bodies.

There are no FDA standards in regulating the amount of chemicals in products, said Malkan. Companies dont even need to know the chemicals that they are putting in their products.

“When these companies are asked about these chemicals, they argue, its legal, so its OK,” said Malkan. “Thats why were calling for the FDA to set a standard and give guidance to these companies for the best manufacturing practices.”

There is no safe level of lead for children, according to the CDC. The government agency issued a report that implored companies to keep lead out of their products to prevent exposure to pregnant women and children.

But the FDA seems to disagree. The government agency told Reuters in a statement, “The FDA did not find high levels of lead in lipstick. We developed and tested a method for measuring lead in lipstick and did not find levels that would raise health concerns.”

Lipstick is only the latest cosmetic to raise red flags. Kim Anderson, executive director of Ava Anderson Non-Toxic, a cosmetic line of chemical-free products, said customers should shy away from any product that lists “fragrance” as an ingredient.

“If theyre using the word fragrance, that company could be hiding up to 600 chemicals under that word,” said Anderson, who advocates for safer cosmetic regulations. “Seventy-five percent of the time, fragrances contain phthalates, a known-carcinogen that causes reproductive issues in the body.”

[…]

Read the full article at: gma.yahoo.com
Image: CC: Flickr, Natalion

FDA Analyses of Lead in Lipsticks Expanded List

LOreal defends safety of its lipsticks, after FDA cites high lead content in some products:

The Personal Care Products Council, which works on behalf of cosmetics companies, is vigorously defending the safety of lipstick.

Halyna Breslawec, head scientist for the group, said lead is only in lipstick because the materials used to make it come from minerals, which have trace amounts of lead in them when they come out of the ground.

“The purpose of lipstick is to impart color. The way you get color in lipstick is to use pigment,” Breslawec said. “Pigments are mineral-based and come from the ground often. There is naturally occurring lead pretty much anywhere. It occurs in nature. We do not add lead to lipstick. Nobody adds lead as an ingredient.”

Thats something Malkan disputes.

“I dont know where the lead is coming from exactly. We see that certain manufacturers have consistently higher levels of lead,” Malkan said. “In our view, and I would challenge them to put forward evidence to the contrary, it does seem like a quality-control issue.”