RSS Feed
February 12th, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
By
Peter Hitchens
Last updated at 10:04 PM on 11th February 2012
As the age of sexual consent is 16, what are state employees doing fitting contraceptive implants in 13-year-old girls? Aren’t they colluding in a criminal act?
These sinister devices are a clear admission by the Government. It actually expects these children to have unlawful sexual intercourse, and wants to make it easy for them.
How strange, given that the one crime we all disapprove of utterly and completely is paedophilia.
As the age of sexual consent is 16, what are state employees doing fitting contraceptive implants in 13-year-old girls? I would be very interested to know exactly what the victims of this scheme are told, and how they are chosen (posed by model)
Even convicted gangsters, rapists, burglars and muggers look down on the paedophiles in their midst (they have another word for them, as they cannot spell or pronounce the official term).
Those who engage in paedophilia are often also accused of ‘grooming’, preparing their victims for violation and abuse.
Yet here we have a policy that directly condones and encourages the sexualisation of children, and is at the very least comparable to the ‘grooming’ we are all so shocked by.
What child, equipped with this rather revolting chemical lump or dose, would not grasp that she was expected by the authorities to act accordingly?
I would be very interested to know exactly what the victims of this scheme are told, and how they are chosen.
This thing is done by doctors and nurses, supposedly symbols of rectitude and mercy.
It often takes place in schools, where our children are meant to be safe from molesters.
It is protected by law. It is paid for by your taxes and mine, extracted under the threat of prison.
Perhaps most sinister of all, it is – like all child-molesting – ‘our little secret’.
The girls’ parents are not asked their permission beforehand for their daughters to be corrupted by our sick state.
Nor are they told afterwards. This is both totalitarian and evil.
The judges are always ready to confirm that this is no longer a Christian country in anything but name, and did so again on Friday – though I do wonder where they think our laws and their powers come from.
But it is much worse than that. We are turning into a sort of Babylon, only with drizzle and sleet.
Almost every sexual practice and habit – with the single exception of faithful marriage – is now encouraged by the state.
First, the state poisons young minds with so-called sex-education, which is now unleashed in primary schools.
Then, when the poor things act on what they have been told, doctors push chemical anti-baby capsules under their skin.
I believe this sort of thing is known as ‘harm reduction’.
It all depends what you mean by harm. Having privatised the telephones, electricity and the railways, we have nationalised paedophilia.
West is making things worse for Syria’s victims
The BBC is working hard to get us to go to war in Syria. Its incessant coverage is – as it was in Libya and Egypt – mostly dim, partial and unquestioning. This should cease.
If there is a rebellion against a dictatorship, then it must, as far as the BBC is concerned, be noble. If a government defends itself against rebellion, it must, according to the BBC, be wrong.
Great slabs of history tell us that this is not necessarily so. In this case, I tremble for the fate of Syria’s Arab Christians if the Assad regime falls.
Bad is often replaced by worse.
Paying a terrible price: Young children wounded by shell fire in the rebel stronghold of Homs
This is already happening in Egypt and Libya, though the BBC seldom troubles to record the aftermath of the ‘Arab Spring’ it welcomed so simple-mindedly.
Perhaps the Corporation is trying to please our Foreign Secretary, William Hague, an increasingly pathetic figure who seems to have mistaken military intervention in foreign countries for conservatism.
Someone should also ask him why he gets so outraged about Syria, and was not outraged by equally bloody repression in Bahrain.
It seems that, having been refused UN permission to destabilise Damascus under the blue flag, we are now looking at running guns to the rebels.
What British interest is served by this dangerous policy?
The revolt in Syria would long ago have faded away had it not been for the noisy support of Washington and London.
Much of the bloodshed and destruction is, I believe, the responsibility of the ‘West’, which has falsely encouraged naive people to believe that Nato helicopters and bombers are just over the horizon.
Since identity cards were abolished long ago, why do we still have an ‘Identity and Passport Service’?
ID cards: the spectre’s still lurking
Since identity cards were abolished long ago, why do we still have an ‘Identity and Passport Service’?
I asked the Home Office, and they treated it as a silly question and snapped dismissively that it would cost too much to change the name.
I said I was sure that the plaque on the Home Secretary’s door didn’t still say ‘Alan Johnson’, but they didn’t get the joke.
Then I asked the Department for Education, as it is now known, how much it had cost to get rid of the stupid New Labour name it used to have.
For the entire department (far bigger than the Passport Office), it cost £8,995, small change in Government terms.
So why do we still have an ‘Identity and Passport Service’? I wonder if identity cards have really gone for good.
What the Dickens?
Sad to think, as we mark the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Dickens, that hardly anyone will still read his books 50 years from now.
What with mass ‘dyslexia’ (otherwise known as very bad reading teaching), and the takeover of childish imaginations by TV and the internet, reading books for pleasure will soon be as rare as seedcake and clay pipes.
Happy anniversary, Charles Dickens: But reading books for pleasure will soon be as rare as seedcake and clay pipes
You can’t replace warships with empty words
The more David Cameron rattles his rusty sabre, the more I fear for the Falklands.
Margaret Thatcher nearly lost them, by proposing to scrap much of the Navy and withdrawing HMS Endurance.
Luckily for her, the Argentinians didn’t wait till we had sold or melted down the ships that formed the Task Force, or she’d be a footnote.
Now, we could not possibly take the islands back if we lost them again, and I am not convinced we are strong enough to hold them against a determined attack.
We also have many fewer friends in the world than we had in 1982. I dread waking up one morning and hearing that Port Stanley is once again in Argentine hands.
Mr Cameron hopes to look tough by boasting about ship deployments. But while I don’t want to give too much away, our ships may not be well suited to the task they face. And they can’t stay for ever.
He should boast less, and try to rebuild the Navy he has cut so clumsily, before it is too late.
Share this article:
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
