Miracle Baby Rescued from an Icy Utah River is a Hoax
The miracle baby rescue, that claim of the saving of the life of a baby trapped in a turned over car in an icy Utah river, is a hoax. There is no other possibility.
It is yet another arch-Zionist DHS-inspired stage, a fake, which is readily proven. Traffic was diverted in the DHS-style set up; it was all planned well in advance.
The hoax can be fully confirmed by the chief story lines, some of which are inane beyond belief. One of these most ridiculous story lines relates to the hearing of voices by rescue workers. Why do they need to hear voices, which they claimed as a motivation? They see a turned over car. What purpose would those ‘voices’ serve? Per the DailyMail:
The four officers who rescued an 18-month-old toddler from the wreck of a submerged car on Sunday said they launched into their heroics when they heard desperate pleas for help coming from a woman inside. But when the four men used all their strength to right the red Dodge sedan, they found little Lily Groesbeck to be the only passenger left alive in the vehicle.
Her mother, 25-year-old Lynn Jennifer Groesbeck, had passed away the night before when she lost control of the car and could not possibly have called for the men to help save her child.
‘For two nights I’ve laid awake trying to figure out exactly what it could be. All I know is it was there, we all heard it,’ Spanish Fork Police Officer Tyler Beddoes said. ‘It was extra motivation.’
NOTE: No one can believe this to be anything other than a staged act, a pure arch-fabrication: a terminally corrupt hoax.
It is also said that a good Samaritan played a key role:
A fisherman discovered the wreck about 12:30 p.m. Saturday in Utah’s Spanish Fork River, about 14 hours after the accident. He found the baby upside down, still strapped in a car seat.
NOTE: He supposedly made the initial discovery of a dead Lynn Groesbeck, along with the hanging from her seat daughter, Lynn Jennifer Groesbeck. There is just too much drama, here. It’s simply too surreal.
How does anyone know it was 14 hours later? More importantly, how did the car get there? Did it catapult from the bridge all the way down? There were no skid marks on that pavement, per the StandardSpeaker, “there were no skid marks,” yet it is said that the car skidded and somehow crashed into the creek? How, just how? Moreover, who is this fisherman? Let him make his face and words public.
There is no possibility of a real car accident with a car that skidded on the pavement, smashed into an abutment, and then toppled over a bridge without a trail of evidence. It is minus-1o deficient trail; nothing is seen. Noted one poster:
For the car to hit the abutment and somehow go over it and into the river there would certainly have to be a virtual spray of small car parts on the road at the abutment. We see no photographs of car parts or dirt from the undercarriage. The crash site is immaculately clean.
In 99.9% of all car impact accidents there’s an amazing amount of small debris and car road dirt on the road at the immediate crash scene. This would be especially true when noting the amount of damage to this car.
Therefore, this is a junkyard car, which was totaled in a crash prior to this date.
There is no ice, here. It’s relatively shallow. In this image no evidence of a submerged or half-submerged car can be seen. Supposedly, the car was turned upright by firemen. There is no evidence for this. In fact, what does it look like? It looks like the car was simply lowered there by the fire department or other DHS-associated entities:
Where are the images of the rescue, that is the recovery of the baby or even the recovery of the corpse, that is the dead mother? Instead, there are images such as this. Does this inspire confidence of this being a real event?
Could he offer a bigger, broader grin and smile than this?
“Look how stupid people are. There’s no one in this car. There’s no upside down baby. No matter. The gullible public will buy it. They’ll donate money to the cause, for sure they’ll fall for it.”
No wonder he is laughing. Look what the fully bamboozled public fell for in this case:
The overturned car was perched on the bank and rocks. As the girl dangled inside, icy water rushed just below her head through the broken windows. Temperatures were near-freezing.
They found the baby in the back and a woman dead in the front seat after she flipped over the car. A firefighter jumped into the river and cut the car-seat straps, freeing the baby who was wearing only a flannel onesie and no hat or gloves.
Officers then formed a line in the river and handed the cold child from one person to the next until she was on the shoreline and in emergency workers’ arms.
http://standardspeaker.com/news/baby-found-dangling-in-overturned-car-in-river-shocks-police-1.1845865
Who in the world believes such nonsense, handing her from one rescuer to another? What a ridiculous Hollywood-style, screenplay commentary.
It sure doesn’t seem like the kind of environment where a woman was killed, a dying baby rescued, and some seven police officers and firemen sent to the hospital from hypothermia. How does a person get hypothermia from standing in a creek? It is virtually impossible at that shallow level, especially well-dressed men involved in rescue. Where are the images showing these men being transported away for their near death hypothermia experiences?
Where are the hypothermic police- and fire-men?
Is this for show, too? Will the car really be drawn up by that fire truck through cords? It surely isn’t powerful enough to do so. Instead, the vehicle was brought up most likely along the shoreline:
That makes the most sense, which is to draw it up via a wench.
The father, Deven Trafny, is an arch-hoaxer. The Zionist agent well knows that the vulnerable, gullible goy will fall for his ploy. He’s an arch-fraudster. Yet, it is said:
The choked-up dad described the emotional reunion with his daughter at a Salt City children’s hospital following the tragic crash.
“I came in, I put my finger in her hand, and I told her ‘dad is here’ and I loved her,” Trafny said on Wednesday, KUTV reported. “She squeezed my hand and then a few hours later she tried to open her eyes. I haven’t left her bedside since.”
Yet, what can be heard by this treacherous one at the end of one of his video interviews? After he spreads the lie of real compassion and caring, what does he say? After rambling on and acting it all out before the cameras this is his close:
“OK, now kill it.”
Is this the tone of voice or the type of behavior expected of a man who just lost his former girlfriend and the mother of his child and also nearly lost the child herself? On a CNN interview he can be heard saying, while always looking away from the camera:
The Zionist Jew is playing the role, even as a psyops mole, sure to mention “nursery rhymes.”
The only “rhyme” he knows is the sound of money as as the cash register rings, ‘Kachink, Kachink.’
-
Forum – temat: Komentarze publikacji Zasadniczy fałsz …
One reason for the frequency of German names among Jews is a 1787 … in Europe that required Jews to register a permanent family surname, and they required that this surname be German.
It is mere extortion, criminal corruption. Fully, his goal is to purge as much money from the gullible, trusting, readily bamboozled public as is possible. He is aided in this corruption by another arch-Zionist mole, sister Jill Sanderson:
-
A Large Selection of Sephardic Jewish Surnames – Sephardim and …
A Large Selection of Sephardic Jewish Surnames/Sephardim and … San Christophoro Sanabria Sananes Sanberg Sanders, Sanderson ...
How did they get the dead mother out without breaking open the entire car? Or, is she still in there, entombed?
Now, suddenly, the door is opened? How did they get the baby out?
Sources:
Source Article from http://nodisinfo.com/miracle-baby-rescued-from-an-icy-utah-river-is-a-hoax/
Views: 0