RSS Feed
July 24th, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
July 25, 2012
(l. Karen Busby, Professor of Law, University of Mantoba )
Manitoba’s Disgrace is compounded by feminists like Law Professor Karen Busby
who defend the indefensible.
by Henry Makow Ph. D.
The Lori Douglas scandal disgraces the people of Manitoba, and discredits its justice system. The shame is compounded by Douglas’ obvious lying and the Winnipeg Establishment’s defense of her outrageous behavior.
Lori Douglas is not just any judge. She is the Chief Family Court Judge of Manitoba. Will anyone accept her judgments on marriage and child custody when the following pictures are on the Internet:
Justice Douglas lies on a bed, eyes closed, her hands shackled to the bed frame.
A topless Justice Douglas has a dog collar and chain around her neck.
Her Honor is urinating on the grass.
“Waiting for Black C**k.” Justice Douglas performs fellatio on a man.
The Canadian Judicial Council is holding an inquiry on whether to dismiss her. She should have resigned long ago. She claims to be an innocent victim, that her husband, Jack King, put these pics on the Internet without her knowledge, and she was “betrayed.”
In fact, she is still married to Jack King, left, which is proof of her complicity. He solicited a Black man, Alex Chapman to have kinky sex with her in 2003 and take pictures. She actually met Chapman twice and cooed over the size of his abs. Admittedly she wasn’t a judge yet, but certainly this behavior disqualifies her.
“What do you think? Are you interested?” King wrote in an email to Chapman on May 8, 2003.
“I
am making progress. She seems more interested at the moment in another
woman + bondage, with her being the one tied up,” King wrote.
“She suggested this evening… that you should be invited out here,” King wrote three weeks later.
Are we supposed to believe King was making this up? Douglas posed for the pictures. She knew they were online and she was willing to pose with Chapman until he decided to shake them down.
Douglas thinks she can keep her $250,000 sinecure because she is part of the corrupt and decadent Winnipeg Masonic establishment.
Douglas maintains that the facts “were
well known in the legal community” and even by the judicial committee
which appointed her — right down to details about the nude photo which
Douglas describes as graphic, explicit pictures including bondage.
“Even
the Chief Justice of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench was aware of
the issue and supported her bid to become a judge, the documents state.”
“Senior
members of the bench and bar made it clear to Ms. Douglas that her
husband’s conduct did not reflect negatively on her. She was urged by
them to apply for judicial appointment,” her lawyers say.
If this is true, then the whole justice system is rotten and more heads should roll.
Douglas, (left) is compounding her crime by lying, by claiming to be an innocent victim. “The system of justice would be brought into disrepute if the victim of wrongdoing were punished,” her lawyers state.
Give me a break!
KAREN BUSBY
Karen Busby is typical of the feminist zealots that have reduced our “education” system to Illuminati (Communist) re-education centers.
This is what her students think of her, from “Rate Your Professor.”
“She is terribly unfriendly, and more interested
in her political agenda than anything else. Will quote “facts” not in
the judgement to justify why the courts are wrong and she is right.
Like many profs, if your conclusion is one she does not politically
agree with, your mark will be lower as a result. Drier than dried mud
in a dryer.”
“Worst Prof at Robson Hall. She brings her political views in the class and
god help you if you don’t agree. Hates students and hates life. Transfer
out of Manitoba or go to the other section if you are going to have her!”
On Monday, she published a defense of Douglas, “Judge not lest ye be Spanked” in the Globe and Mail. In my opinion, it calls into question her fitness to tech.
She begins by complaining that this inquiry should not be taking place. She says that posing nude online is now commonplace:
“A 2008 U.S. survey found that
one in five teens had electronically shared nude or semi-nude images of
themselves and that almost 50 per cent of teens had participated in
“sexting,” the electronic sharing of sexualized images and texts.”
We’re not talking about teenagers. We’re talking about a Family Court Judge.
“If Judge
Douglas loses her place on the bench simply because someone distributed
nude photos of her – after promising to destroy all paper and electronic
copies – many leaders of tomorrow will live in fear that they could
face the same fate.”
Here, she is twisting the facts. Lori Douglas’ husband posted the pictures, not Alex Chapman (left). Then Busby makes the case that bondage is mainstream and acceptable:
“Does it matter that these photos
apparently show a judge in bondage gear? Research indicates that
interest in bondage is higher than one might expect. A 1993 U.S. study
found that 12.5 per cent of adults had engaged in sexual sado-masochism
(SM) at some time in their life. More recent studies indicate
growing interest. A 1999 Canadian study found that 65 per cent of
university students have fantasies of being tied up, whereas 62 per cent
fantasize about tying up a partner. “
This is typical of how feminists mainstream decadence.
Satanism makes what is perverse and deviant seem healthy and natural. This is satanic worship, whether Busby knows it or not.
Conversely, Satanism makes what is healthy seem evil, as when Betty Friedan compared being a mother housewife to an inmate in a Nazi concentration camp.
Busby is also a “gay rights” activist. Her argument continues:
“If SM expressions are mainstream and
ubiquitous, how can it be concluded that the integrity of the judiciary
is undermined just because a judge, prior to appointment, permitted her
spouse to take photos of her wearing bondage gear?”
I would wager that Karen Busby is not married, has no children, and may even be a lesbian. She doesn’t understand that the debauchery of S M is antithetical to healthy families. Families require monogamy, fidelity and love; SM requires promiscuity and emotions very different from love. Children require parents who focus on their welfare, not on titillating themselves sexually.
I don’t want Karen Busby training future family lawyers. I don’t want Lori Douglas deciding the fate of Manitoba families. They remind me of the network of elite perverts that extends to Jerry Sandusky in Pennsylvania and to Nebraska, Portugal and Belgium.
The whole spectacle reeks of moral squalor and cowardice. The church is silent. The media makes excuses. Politicians hide.
Society indeed is satanically possessed. Sexual debauchery is the drug. The Illuminati, and their feminist and Freemason shills, is the dealer.
—
Related – Lori Douglas Scandal Exposes Masonic Underground
Comments for “Lori Douglas’ “Defense” is a Disgrace “
Al Thompson said (July 24, 2012):
I’m not surprised at all by this kind of behavior. I’d say that most government people are perverts one way or another. Seeing the complete lack of morality within the government really does take their authority away. Government as we know it today is worthless and destructive.
A family court judge who does these unseemly things shouldn’t be let loose in public let alone make these kinds of decisions. The tolerance of all sexual morality gets this garbage started, and it get progressively worse as time goes on. All of us go do better and this is a typical example of why people should raise their moral standards. Everyone would benefit.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/07/it-starts-with-fornication.html
E said (July 24, 2012):
Yes, it seems like they’re setting up the “husband,” such as he is, for taking the heat off his wife so she can be a victim. Pathetic dangerous.
The people of Manitoba should be outraged. Where are they?
The CBC has also shut down comments for this story. Musn’t have anything nasty said about debauched judges must we? This way they can also spin the story in the “proper” direction. And she’s just one who was exposed.
Where are the true suffragettes when you need them?
http://www.foskc.org/goldstein.htm
“Protest to be effective, must be followed by resolute action and at this crisis in world history when materialistic energy aims at overthrowing spiritual energy and moral values, action needs to develop into a world crusade for the Spiritual Humanity.” Vida Goldstein, 1946
Judge’s husband tells inquiry of sexual fantasies
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/story/2012/07/24/mb-judge-sex-inquiry-jack-king-manitoba.html
Henry Makow is the author of A Long Way to go for a Date. He received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto. He welcomes your feedback and ideas at
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
