Laura Richardson Recommended For Reprimand By House Ethics Committee

August 2nd, 2012

FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda

WASHINGTON — Rep. Laura Richardson, D-Calif., improperly compelled her congressional staff to do campaign work and should be reprimanded and fined for violating standards of conduct, the House Ethics Committee announced Wednesday.

The committee said she admitted to all seven counts of violations and agreed to the proposed punishment, which awaits House action.

The committee unanimously adopted the report of its investigative panel, in which investigators detailed the third-term lawmaker’s coercion, attempts to alter evidence and efforts to influence the testimony of staff members who would be witnesses.

Adoption of the report by the House would constitute a reprimand. The House also was asked by the committee to impose a $10,000 fine to be paid by Dec. 1.

The committee said it discouraged Richardson from permitting any staff members to work in her campaign. She’s in a tough re-election race against fellow Democratic Rep. Janice Hahn. Although Hahn beat Richardson by a 60-39 margin in the primary, the state allows the top two finishers to run against each other in the general election regardless of party affiliation.

The ethics charges have been a drag on Richardson’s fundraising as her campaign was greatly outspent in the primary.

The investigative report said the coercion of the staff began in early 2010 and continued in the current campaign even though Richardson knew she was under investigation.

Investigators said Richardson infuriated the committee by appearing to contradict her own admission that she violated House rules, as well as federal law governing proper use of federal appropriations.

She contended that she had never taken or intended action against any aide who failed to volunteer for campaign work and accused the committee of intimidating and frightening her employees. She also claimed she was unable to fairly present her side of the case.

The committee said she had acted “with utter disdain” for the process and by agreeing to a deal, “rendered her own arguments moot.”

Among the findings by the investigative subcommittee in connection with Richardson’s 2010 campaign were:

_Richardson’s chief of staff, in early 2010, told district staff members that they would be expected to work on the campaign. When one asked what would happen if he declined, he was told he probably wouldn’t have a job.

_Employees were expected to close the congresswoman’s Long Beach office at 6 p.m. every workday and then go to the campaign office to answer the phone and perform “precinct walks.” Staff members were not permitted to take a break for dinner or perform any personal tasks before starting the daily campaign work. Staff members also were expected to attend campaign events on weekends.

_During the fall of 2010, Richardson directed a staff member to volunteer for her opponent’s campaign under a fake name to gather information.

_Richardson repeatedly called staff members who failed to attend campaign events, in order to secure their future appearances. This was an attempt to pressure and intimidate the employees.

_In an October 2010 meeting in the Long Beach office, with the Washington staff watching by teleconference, Richardson explained she was under investigation by the House committee. She “attempted to influence the testimony of members of her staff by suggesting that they tell the committee that their work on her campaign had been voluntary, even though some of it had not,” the report said.

___

Follow Larry Margasak on twitter at http://twitter.com/LarryMargasak

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow

Nuts Bring Buckets of Same

Just in case anyone forgot that the House Judiciary Committee ACORN hearing was a House Judiciary Committee hearing about ACORN, a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/02/acorn-hearing-a-barrel-of_n_376882.html”Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) helpfully brought a bucket of acorns/a to the House Judiciary Committee. Also that day, colleague Lamar Smith praising the “turnout so early in the day” at 2:30pm, and Louie Gohmert offering up the malaprop: “From one acorn, many nuts can grow.” Like, say, Peter King.
Hello Kitty, Hello Revolving Debt

Credit cards. Were it not for them, we would have to save up money in order to buy things. But do some credit cards take it too far, marketing to the youths? Byron Dorgan thought so when he saw the Hello Kitty Platinum VISA. “Does it seem to you like they’re targeting that 10-year-old, the 14-year-old.” Ha! He should see the a href=”http://www.shopinprivate.com/hello-kitty-pink-guilty.html”Hello Kitty vibrator/a.
“I’ll See Your Baby, And Raise You Two Tweens”

Last time out, we made mention of Representative John Shadegg’s (R-Ariz.) attempt to wield a baby in order to make a point about how terrible health care reform was. We neglected to mention that Representative Pete Stark (D-Calif.) took it a step further, and attempted to bring two young children to make his own points about health care (5:25 in video), at which point the House was officially barred from trafficking in human props any further.
John Thune’s Stackin’ Dollars

How much is too much stimulus? When it allows representatives to make junior high math analogies based on topography and astronomy, maybe. Here, Senator John Thune (R-S.D.) makes some stupid pictures of dollar stacks that extend into the sky, to the celestial firmament itself. “If you took 100 dollar bills, Mr. President,” Thune said, “and stacked them on top of each other you would have a stack that goes 689 miles high.” He added, “In other words, if you took the 100 dollar bills and not stacked them on top of each other, but wrapped them side-by-side all around the earth… If you could believe this, it’d go around the earth almost 39 times.” So, we cannot stimulate the economy, because of science! (1:15 in clip)
Gettin’ High On Your Own Supply (Of A Substance That Does Not Get You High)

Representative Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) wasn’t having any of that whole “regulating tobacco” stuff. Why? Because it’s “not the nicotine that kills, it’s the smoke!” So, he argued, why don’t we regulate lettuce, to keep people from smoking lettuce? Wouldn’t that prevent a “pandemic” of cancers? This would have been a good point, were it not for the non-existence of either a massive industry geared toward curing lettuce and rolling it into cigarettes, or a target market of consumers who were even remotely interested in smoking lettuce. BUT YEAH OTHER THAT ALL THAT STUFF (and the fact that nicotine is addictive) STEVE BUYER IS A GENIUS.
And Now, A Poem From Ted Poe

From Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas): iIt came on two pages, It has withstood the ages. / The word “shall,” is only 10 times mentioned, But enough to get one’s attention. / No taxes did this law raise, To this day it continues to create much praise; / Two great religions does it claim, The “Law of the Ten Commandments” is its name. / A current writing, 1,990 pages long, Has a socialist philosophy that is all wrong; / Difficult for the people to understand, And troubling what big government doth demand. / Over 3,445 “shalls” it does loudly shout, New massive taxes does it proudly tout; / Written in secret by the bureaucrats, For exclusive use of the taxacrats. / The Congressional bill called “Health Care Reform,” Is illusionary, the authors are still ill-informed; / Government ought not take over America’s health biz. / And that’s just the way it is.”/i

And so, America, this is why you should have to die of easily treated medical conditions.
And Now, An Even Dumber Poem, From Roland Burris

From the junior senator from Illinois: i”It was the night before Christmas, and all through the Senate / The right held up our health care bill, no matter what was in it / The people had voted a mandated reform / But Republicans blew off the gathering storm / We’ll clog up the Senate, they cried with a grin / And in the midterm elections, we’ll get voted in / They knew regular folks needed help right this second / But fundraisers, lobbyists and politics beckoned / So try as they might, Democrats could not win / Because the majority was simply too thin / Then across every state there rose such a clatter / The whole senate rushed out to see what was the matter / All sprang up from their desk and ran from the floor / Straight through the cloakroom and right out the door.”/i

a href=”http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/22/burris-backs-reform-with_n_400456.html”There’s more/a, but you will probably want to shoot yourself in the face after you read it.
Chuck Grassley Goes All Aggro On The Speaker Box

For some reason, in the course of discussing fuel efficiency standards, Senator Chuck Grassley decided he should drive his point home by shouting out Ashton Kutcher and his movie, “Dude, Where’s My Car.” Prior to this, Grassley went on an a href=”http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Speech_by_GOP_Senator_references_stoner_0924.html”extended monologue/a about Pink Floyd’s iDark Side of the Moon/i album and the shards of a broken prism and the “multishades” of light. Just straight up tripping balls, in the well of the Senate. Anyway, as you now know, this TOTALLY fixed fuel efficiency standards!
Sam Brownback Will Save Your Inanimate Genetic Material

Who’s looking out for your precious bodily fluids? Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, that’s who. And he’s enlisted the help of a young girl, named Hannah, who has the power of talking to human embryos! “a href=”http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/18/brownback-embryo/”Are you going to kill me?/a” the embryos asked Hannah, who immediately scrawled a picture of this conversation on a giant piece of posterboard, so that Sam Brownback could stop people from killing the stem cells. And then Sam Brownback went on to support a bunch of wars in the Middle East!
The Most Important Prop Of All

James Inhofe (R-Batshit) hates him some gay marriage, and the gays in general. And to make his point, he carries around with him The Most Important Prop in America: a picture of his family. “As you see here, and I think this is maybe the most important prop we’ll have during the entire debate, my wife and I have been married 47 years. We have 20 kids and grandkids. I’m really proud to say that in the recorded history of our family, we’ve never had a divorce or any kind of homosexual relationship.” Ha! THAT HE KNOWS OF!