RSS Feed
January 7th, 2017 
Awake Goy I just hung a map on the corner-board outside the Underworld gym (Herculaneum, catch the humour, please) where I go to do my lifts. It’s called a “hate map,” compliments of our shylocked friends at the SPLC. In addition to being rather disappointed that there’s only one puissant blip in Maine (and it’s only the Klan, to boot) it did give me some food for thought. I received the map from a cleaning job I did for a client. The client, as it so happens, turned out to be Jewish. I could write a book in itself about that topic, and I’ll add the idea to my queue of things to process. Anywho.
The circle of folks this woman walks in is eclectic. But the group itself is supported by Liberal Whites. Now understand, when I write the word ‘eclectic’ you should read it as it was meant. Euphemistic. What that really means is; makes the skin crawl. (But only a little.) Of course, I can tie in my intro by adding that simply by noticing that certain groups give my bones a scratch I gotta itch, other decidedly certain groups will take notice… and place it upon their Atlas-like shoulders to rehabilitate me, the misguided individual that I am. And they have a very specific way of going about it.
Oh, you’ve heard it all before. You just hate me because I’m beautiful. Or, well, you’re just projecting. Or; it’s okay if you’re jealous. Or maybe don’t hate me because I’m right. Perhaps even, hey! I’m just saying it like it is. Uh-huh. Interesting deflections, there. Always meant to be taken with a grain of salt and a sense of humour. But so often, the humour bites, and the velvet glove has an iron fist. Society has a tendency to bloat and bust at the seams with all the barely mitigated social pressure.
Because I write to a swathe of general topics intended to make life more bearable for the reader, I always make sure to remind the reader that my work appears in a Nationalist outlet, and that my desired audience is the Nationalist. Also – I have little ability to enrich the lives of non-Nationalists, because like the rest of humanity, I succumb to my own pettiness.
So! Speaking of stress and Nationalism, now that I’ve had ample time to shake the holiday off, I wanted to write a little ditty about the psyche of deflection. Yes, I used the term ‘psyche’ in her possessive sense. I did so because deflective psychology takes on a life of her own and seems to possess the minds of those she infects. Like a cancer, or a daemon.
Here we go. In my circles, and I mean the offline, flesh-life circles here, I am general considered to be a good man. Among my outstanding characteristics are: I love my wife, I’m good with kids, I am active and keep busy, I am not afraid to do hard work or help a friend, I am intelligent and usually have something interesting to say – I generally try to leave someone with a smile on their face. By and large, I am well-liked by my peers.
So why is it, then, that when my political views come under suspicion, or a little bit of my opinion (which is always regarded until someone falls on the other side of it) slips out, am I all of a sudden put on the watch? Why is it that when someone begins to realise I have no interest in digging up Hitler’s bones and grinding them into libido medicine for bored Jews, do I of a sudden become a threat, something to tread lightly around? If I let slip my disgust with the blacks, why do people hide the tow rope? If I make an off-colour comment about the Mestizos, why is it assumed that I must hate all those who dare have Taco Tuesday with their family?
Given my track record, is that a rational leap? If you’re a Nationalist reading, you know the answer is a hearty “no.” But I want to record the hows and whys of socially liberal society in regards to the judgement and condemnation complex. First I’m going to wave my mighty hand and spread the waters of Biblical controversy.
For years, all the years I spent under Catholicism and the several in general Christian inquiry, I have heard the passage which goes; “judge not lest ye be judged.” Typically the passage is used as a deflection for those that do not want their motives questioned, or better still, for struggling liberals who are too gutless to shed their Christian overcoats that need to rationalise Jesus while defending their hopeless pert causes.
At any rate, the idea of judgement has been thoroughly raped. It will annoy my Pagan readership that I clarify things for the Christians, but I do not share the enmity that many have for those on either side of the debate and I have no tolerance for the in-fighting as a resource-drain and a mental retardant against further advancement for our cause. Anyway. We owe our modern idea of judgement to the Bible, and so regardless of your spiritual orientation the word must be disentangled.
Judgement can, and should, be understood as discernment. To analyse, evaluate. Analyse refers to assessing the variables and ramifications of a general subject or object. Evaluate refers to the act of measuring the benefits or detriments of a thing, as well as the potential of utility involved. The words today have warped meaning. Due to scriptural confusion and misinterpretation, the word “judgement” has come to share the same meaning as “condemn.”
In an age of weak, knobby-kneed limp-sacks, the idea of being judged – read condemned – is almost unbearable. This is because of the superficial nature of society where one’s place in the community has become their god. Both Christians and Pagans should be able to appreciate the significance of this levied accusation.
So for most – they live in an abject spiritual poverty in which being critiqued equates to a metaphorical roasting in Sh’eol. Oy gevalt and all that. Many do not consider that the conception of judgement began as a morally neutral sentiment. It was generally assumed that cosmic punishment, or condemnation, lay within the purview of Gods to dish out. Human justice mimicked the cosmic function.
However, man has largely come to regard social status with a godlike hue, because it is the trappings of civilisation which grant creature comfort – the biggest blessing and curse we know. Another facet of the judgement question is that, because of the aforementioned social strain, the individual citizen is his or herself judgemental, vain and caustic. Because opinions matter, and are like assholes, the citizen knows the depth to which criticism goes, the ugly cynicism and the unfair expectations. Never mind the double standards!
In short, the modernist can dish, but cannot swallow the bites they chew off. With that out of the way I’ll make my way to the article I wanted to write. The topic of the moral imperiousness with which the White Liberal carries on. I won’t spend too much time on describing the problem child that is White liberality, we all have families and are privy to that knowledge. I will instead attempt to dissect the conflated psychological influences involved.
It is my belief that knowing the waters will help you navigate them, allow you to more seamlessly dialogue with people in that boat, and more importantly, keep your calm when traversing rugged causeways and dire straits. If you can remain incorrigible and incorruptible when presented with liberality and the infectious mindset it possesses, than you can often turn the sharp tongue away and make a superior social deflection which is far more effective than being lowered to the level of pedantic pejoratives.
Must I cover the basics of the modern Liberal MO? I didn’t think so. Aside of their obsession with rectitude, there is nothing to say that the reader does not know. First. The obsession with rectitude is most intimately arrayed with the perversion or subversion of the natural order. Those Liberals who are not brave enough to confess to themselves and others that the two key adjectives last used are their MO, will insist that they are only ‘updating’ the natural order. End result: same.
The Liberal, especially the American Liberal, has a tendency toward collecting inner dichotomies. Shall I supply you with examples? There is Bill Clinton who praised his Negro constituency, but could not last the better part of a month in a Negro neighbourhood. There are the vast numbers of Hollywood intellectuals who cry for social justice, but live in majority White gated communities because their instinct informs them that these are more safe. My personal favourite example is the multiculturalist who constantly obsesses about historical injustices regarding Jews and Blacks… hates racists and views them as cavemen… but doesn’t want their children mating with coloured people, being exposed to coloured culture, or more accurately, threatening in any way their nucleus of White Liberal comfort zones.
There is a cost that comes with running up hill. Every Liberal senses that their struggle is an uphill battle. The Liberal sets their sites on a social pet cause that they think will win them accolades, or, in their words, allow them to correct historical injustices. Because the Liberal has a vacuum in their personality that requires affirmation, affirmation that comes from their clique, they have to justify their contiguity in the collective. To do this, the Liberal will do one of two things: they will either exaggerate and aggrandise the importance of their cause, or else they will flutter from subject to subject looking for a fix.
The Liberal views suppression of Nature as being noble. When convenient. The Liberals admire those who work diligently towards revising the social order, what-ever it may be. They have in store a special disdain for those who truly live freely.
The disdain the Liberal has for free-thinkers, the so-called Racists, Nationalists, or, more accurately, the “anti” crowd stems from the fact that Liberals have a subconscious awareness of operating on a script.
The Liberal community is largely based upon this idea of community activism – the idea of doing something to change the world for the better. Even if that ‘something’ is bloviating to people who agree with you. They have their own fellowship, their own lingo. All based around the propping up of their dystopia paradise. Of course, like with any culture, there are expected mores. Performance. The pressure to perform makes anyone grumpy, and American Liberals are among the grumpiest.
Liberalism is its own religion, and the Liberal knows this. They know that in their active circles, they must continuously justify their existence. If they relent in their quest, than the other Liberals will think less of them. One of the reactionary strategies used to make themselves relevant is their extreme judgementalism. Liberals have no problem with snidely looking down their noses, reducing entire subcultures that don’t meet their approval into base stereotypes.
Of course, the subconscious drive is that through judgement, one is superior. The only reason you ever judge someone else is if you think you’re doing better. It then becomes an easy fix to judge one thing, and then another. It becomes habit. The end result is that nothing, no one, ever satisfies. It is why such people are always so damn cranky.
Subconsciously, this is a way of justifying behaviour, as well. For the Liberal, actively acting in condemnation requires rationalisation. One cannot condemn without reason. So the Liberal must constantly revisit the drawing board, continuously straining their pet causes. This causes them stress, which in turn makes them angry. It leads to volatility and more condemnation.
This is why so many social justice warriors are bitter, empty vessels. I have known more than a handful of ex-SJWs who all report likewise: that they got caught in a cycle. That the high of being righteous, working for a higher purpose… and shoving it to the wrongdoers was like a high. But with any drug, you have to adjust the dosage. It is a vicious cycle.
And for the coup de grace, we all know the results. Liberals divert blame: they ignore their own self-obsession, their thirst for prestige, by constantly bringing attention to the flaws and sins of others. They achieve this through self-righteous condemnation. And if they cannot find evidence of wrongdoing, they falsify it to create a continued relevance for their pathetic causes. Their self-designed ideals of having right on their side give them permission to abuse others, to view them as less, without suffering the penalty they feel that wrongdoers should suffer.
So the wheels on the bus go round and round.
Round and round.
Source Article from http://www.renegadetribune.com/its-not-me-its-you/
Views: 0
Posted in 
