RSS Feed
January 24th, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
“If feeding a child by hand or a child sleeping with parents is an
offence, then all Indian parents including me are guilty of this. The first
principle of parenting is that a child should sleep with parents to instil
in the child a sense of security.”
She said Indians took their parenting lessons from the story of Lord Ganesh,
the elephant-headed God, whose human head was turned to ashes by a rival as
he was being held in his mother’s arms.
“We Indian mothers cannot sleep with our back to our kids,” she
added.
Norwegian child protection officers in Stavanger regarded these practices as
evidence that their mother and father were unfit parents and took them into
care last May after the elder child, exhibited behavioural problems in
school.
They began visiting the family last year after their four year old son began
behaving ‘erratically’ in class for an hour each week. They decided the
children’s mother, Sagarika Chakraborty was suffering from ‘depression’, was
‘tired’ and had little ‘patience.’ She was ‘overfeeding’ the children and
they were concerned that the boy Abhigyan, aged three, was sleeping with his
father.
The father, Anurup Bhattarcharya, a senior geoscientist, told a television
channel he had appealed to the Indian government to requisition Norway’s
King to intervene, because Norwegian officials were unsympathetic. “The
children’s mother is mentally fit. The day’s are passing quickly and we ask
the government to speed up the process to get back our kids,” he said.
The mother’s father Manotosh Chakraborty last night told The Daily Telegraph
the decision to take the children into care was “cruel”. “The
way the parents were caring about their children is perfectly normal as per
our social norms. In fact that’s how we brought up their mother,” he
said.
The head of Stavanger’s Child Welfare Services, Gunnar Toresen, denied
cultural differences were a factor in its decision. “I most strongly
deny that this case in any way is based on cultural prejudice or
misinterpretation. I am unable to give any comments regarding the particular
grounds in this case because of our duty of confidentiality.”
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
