RSS Feed
May 6th, 2016 
Awake Goy I’ve always thought that the difference between modern Liberals and us is just a matter of degree and not of nature. In this age of mediocrity even Liberalism has become half-hearted and I am convinced that if we follow Liberal arguments and ideals to their most profound conclusions they would more easily support White Nationalism than Multiculturalism.
Classical liberalism is a political ideology that values the freedom of individuals — including the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and markets — as well as limited government.
Liberalism nowadays has nothing to do with “Liberty”, rather they are very close minded about morality; they say we are evil, just as a Victorian old woman would condemn two adolescents who kiss outside a Church.
Liberalism has nothing to do with having courage because “liberal” views are the cherished ones by the media. Liberalism has nothing to do with “standing up” against oppression, rather it’s like “sitting down” protected by the shadow of political correctness. This is not heroic, it’s just pathetic, mediocre and lazy!
The moment in which the creativity and sensibility of Liberals unite with the practicality, intelligence and self-assertion of Nationalists into a White Movement, we will become invincible.
I believe the reason Liberalism has hijacked the minds of our young people is because they use art in order to promote it. Naturally if you put so much money and effort into something, you will always find the way to create an appealing container, even if the content is perverse and ugly.
In order to get people to join us, we must appeal to our people’s Liberal and spiritual sensibilities, not just using rational and practical arguments. That’s why I decided to write this article.
Imagine you, as a White activist, are invited by the Jewish media for a televised interview. Obviously their only goal is to ridicule your ideas and portray you as a primitive bigot. But what if you start to answer all the interviewer’s attacks and destroy his arguments with Liberal ideas, just taken to a deeper level?
It would take too much space to recreate a realistic interview, therefore I will only roughly outline the basis of the arguments to get the point.
Interviewer: “You Nationalists have a racist, discriminatory, exclusionary program”
Well, there are honorable and dishonorable ways for fighting for people’s support in the political arena, we only ask to be allowed to use the same weapons as you.
Interviewer: “What does that mean?
Well, promoting Multiculturalism and the mixing of races is in itself a racial program which discriminates against people who prefer not to mix. This program of racial selection for a mixed population carries the assumption that to coerce people into mixing races is morally right. We can think of it as a breeding program driven by fanatic moral opinions.
Interviewer: “Wait a second, we are just promoting freedom and we coerce no one”
Social condemnation is a form of coercion. Which form of coercion is more inhumane – to kick someone’s ass or to exclude him from social life? You can easily make the case that the latter is worse because you can recover from a beating and continue with your life, but if you are ostracized from society and your source of income is taken from you, you cannot survive. That’s evil.
Interviewer: “So you think other races are inferior and must be exterminated?”
We prefer a White society, the same that you prefer a mixed race one. We just want the possibility to fight for people’s support using the same methods as you. If you think there is nothing immoral in asking White people to sacrifice themselves for a mixed race society and to prompt White people not to have White children, we want to do the same. We want to try our luck convincing people that it is moral to sacrifice themselves for a White society and prompt other races not to have children in our societies. You don’t have better morals than us.
Interviewer: “But you know this will have dire consequences for other races [here can go a long list of records of oppression and racism]?”
“Anyone who says a medicine has no side effects is a liar” goes a famous saying in the medical profession. Any doctor will tell you that there doesn’t exist a substance in nature which has no side-effects, you just have to choose one whose effects you are willing to tolerate. The same applies to politics; your breeding program for a Multicultural society will have as many dire consequences for at least the same number of people. We just want to be allowed to inform the public about that and let them decide.
I’ll end the interview here to comment about the side effects of NAZI Germany. If tomorrow the Capitalist/Zionist regime were dethroned and we were to scrutinize all the private records and all the inner secrets (as we do now with Hitler’s regime) we would be shocked and dumbfounded about the intrigues, lies, persecutions, injustices, murders, genocide, and plain evil and inhumanity. Even if we considered the lies told about Hitler as true, they would fall short in comparison.
Every regime has dirty secrets, what is surprising is not that Hitler did some morally questionable things; what is surprising is how clean his record is considering the amount of responsibility and the possibility for corruption (that every political entity affords). What is surprising is that after considering human weaknesses, Hitler’s regime created more Beauty and good and had more practical and realistic views than The Hellenistic Empire, The Roman Empire and Modern Capitalism combined. Instead of incessantly repeating Hitlers peccadilloes in order to make them sound bigger than they were, our media could have more new crimes to tell everyday (real ones) from the dethroned Zionists than we can digest in a lifetime.
Liberals are irreverent. They don’t take conventional morals and authorities seriously; they make fun of them and I admire that. So it’s time to show them how to be irreverent about Jewish power, to make fun of the politically correct authority, and not to take “morality” seriously when it comes to other races.
Since many Liberals are so oriented toward Art and Beauty, we can attempt to show them that in the transcendental, objective morals don’t exist; only Beauty and ugliness exist. We show them that we cannot avoid choosing (no one can do everything and be everything), and we should choose Beauty. We can show them the fact that only Beauty can inspire progress, and if we advance it using humanitarian and non-traumatic methods, we can have a chance to win their support.
I myself was as Liberal as one can be, and only after liberating myself (no pun intended) from the yoke of morality I had the courage of taking Liberalism to its final conclusion – the Beauty and creativity of the Aryan race – free of the yoke of Christian/Marxist humanitarian morals, which now, in my mind are only associated with Ugliness, mediocrity and the non-White races.
Source Article from http://www.renegadetribune.com/liberalism-taken-seriously-leads-white-nationalism/
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
