RSS Feed
February 28th, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
The ex-wife “and her solicitors have boasted to me and others that she ‘owns’
the courts in England and Wales and the Government”, he said.
Mr Burby alleged the unnamed ex–spouse, whom he described as one of the
wealthiest women in the world, had a sexual relationship “with one of her
two solicitors”, as well as two other men, one of which resulted in her
having an abortion.
The law firm’s letter, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph,
was sent yesterday to every member of the 26-strong committee, as well as
Attorney General Dominic Grieve, a High Court judge and John Bercow, the
Speaker of the House of Commons.
It said: “We have no doubt that should the committee continue to publish then
the injunction will be fully breached and further harm done to our client.
“There is a great deal more damage which could be caused to her, and which
could be averted by the timely removal of this material. We hope that the
committee will appreciate the serious injustice being done.
“We also hope that the committee will appreciate the diplomatic repercussions
of continuing to publish Mr Burby’s untested allegations about a friendly
head of state in these circumstances.”
The same law firm also threatened The Daily Telegraph with an
injunction ahead of its reporting of Mr Burby’s submission on Friday night.
No application was made however, and the report
ran in Saturday’s Daily Telegraph.
Last night, the document at the centre of the order was still available on the
Parliamentary website and could be read by anyone in the world.
John Whittingdale MP, the committee’s chairman, said last week that Mr Burby’s
evidence was an “interesting and relevant submission”, given that his
committee had been told by judges that the super-injunctions were now
“time-limited”.
The last known attempt to gag the reporting of Parliament was in 2009, when
Trafigura, an oil firm, attempted through its lawyers to prevent newspapers
from publishing a parliamentary question.
Trafigura had obtained a gagging order preventing any details of the question
posed by Paul Farrelly MP being made public.
However, there was enough information publicly available for tens of thousands
of Twitter users to work out the focus of the injunction and post messages
of protest identifying the parties involved.
The attempt to gag the reporting of the Parliamentary Question was abandoned,
after an uprising by users of the micro-blogging website Twitter.
MPs have broken several other injunctions by naming public figures such as
Ryan Giggs, the Manchester United footballer, and Sir Fred Goodwin, the
former chief executive of RBS, who had used the courts to suppress
information about their personal lives.
The committee is made up of both MPs and Lords and is considering the system
of privacy and injunctions.
They were told earlier this year by Ken Clarke, the Lord Chancellor, that
super-injunctions “are now being granted only for very short periods” and
“you cannot have just long-running secret litigation”.
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
