RSS Feed
November 16th, 2015 
Awake Goy What is the Best Way to Classify and Identify the Native Europeans Populations and Their Descendants?
Before digging a little more into the topic, let’s define (or discuss if you do not agree) some terms first (from more specific to more general terms):
Country: A defined physical territory, which has a defined population within its borders, and runs under a specific government system and body of laws.
Nation State: Where a defined country encloses as its only, or major, population (a defined Nation), so that country is a Nation State (although the most correct term will be “Nation Country”). If the government of that country effectively resides in the Nation (e.g. Sovereign Nation), then we can correctly say that it is a Nation State (e.g. Germany, although being a mostly “Nation Country”, has been in external Jewish occupation, so we cannot longer say that it is a Nation State).
Nation: A subset of population where, although obviously sharing the overall ties of people within a defined “Folk / Volk” (e.g. Germanic peoples, all speaking a Germanic language, although German and Swedish are not mutually intelligible, for example), share a specific and additional subset of historical, genetic, cultural and linguistic ties and characteristics that differentiates them from the rest of people of the Volk; in short, Nations develop from Volks. A major differentiation from Volks is that most European Nations developed generally between late Pre-History and recorded History (e.g. the German Nation (Deutsche) developed from the Germanic Volk mostly between the beginning of the Migration Period and the beginning of the High Middle Ages).
Folk / Volk / People: Originated primarily from a native European way of thinking (from which the XIX / XX century German way is the most recognized), where the human populations of the world are classified around common evolutionary origins, common linguistic structures, common cultural characteristics and common genetic composition. The XIX / XX century German Völkisch Movement, for example, would define and classify most of the European populations in “Volks” like Germanic (Germanen / German, Germanen / Low German, Germanen / Dutch, Germane / Afrikaans, Germanere / Danish, Germanere / Norwegian Bokmål and Germaner / Swedish), Slavic and Mediterranean Peoples and so on. Furthermore, a Volk is, in general, a collection of related “components” or Races, but it is also a collection of Nations which developed from it.
Various traditional costumes from different regions of Germany
A major characteristic of Europeans Volks is that they developed mainly in pre-historic times (e.g. up to the “Germanic Heroic Period”, for the Germanic Volk). We can imply elaborated behavioral and social characteristics (or tendencies) from certain Volks (e.g. for the Germanic Volk, strong sense of honor, group membership, seeking of social status, warlike attitude, leader / chief based society, simple but effective hierarchical structure, exploration and risk taking, team work, strong respect and attachment to nature, monogamous and medium size families, are common landmarks).
Various depictions (many of them romanticized) of different ancient Germanic groups (Migration Period) and related Gods
Race: In general, Race can be understood as a defined genetic group, or sub-group, that usually resides between a Volk and / or a Nation; but also can range across Volks and Nations, usually, most Volks are constituted mainly from a small group of predominant Races, but lesser (smaller) Races cannot be underestimated; on the other hand, Nations usually derived from a single of a couple of predominant Races (but this is more like a rule of thumb). Races are a product of profound ancient genetic changes, over thousands of years, under extreme environments and extended social trouble and they precede Volks in some degree (but also, Race and Volk could develop alongside).
Apart from the genetic aspect, which can be analyzed more accurately, given its age and the difficulty of try to document the background of its development in an accurate way, we can only imply basic behavioral and social characteristics (or tendencies) for certain Races (e.g. for Races of Northern and Central European origins, delaying of gratification, tribe membership, tribe respect and acceptance and predisposition for monogamy, are common landmarks).
Reconstructions of people (and some preserved mummies) and costumes of ancient European races (mainly from northern and central Europe), include maps of distribution of related “cultures” (Jastorf Culture – Pre-West Germanic, Hallstatt Culture – Pre-Continental Celtic)
Europeans: A very broad term, mostly of geographical origin, which encloses all the Volks and Nations which have been developed mainly in the European Continent and immediate Eurasian regions (e.g. some regions beyond the Urals, and some regions beyond the Caucasus Mountains). Although a mostly geographic term, the kind of geographical isolation of Europe (include related islands) since the Ice Ages, has been driving the development of The European Peoples (Europeans Volks / European Nations), in a very specific way, isolating that development in some degree from events of other regions of the world, both in blood and culture. In short, most European Peoples share / borrow common characteristics from each other. As European peoples have been isolated from the rest of the world, they have influenced each other since the beginning of times, affecting the development of Volks and Nations in some degree.
White: A pretty new term, although the Greeks used a similar term to refer themselves in contrast to people from African and Middle East, the current term comes from the 17th century, mainly from English speaking colonies, in order to differentiate “European“ from native or imported (e.g. Blacks in Americas) populations. Although White could be understood as a simplified way to say “European” in those times, there are some flaws with it because currently, White mainly refers to skin color (or at least the media try to imply that). There are also other problems, as not all native populations of Europe are “that White” (e.g. many Sicilians, Southern Spaniards and Greeks could be pretty dark skinned), and also, many people without (or questionable) European origins, could be white skinned.
We cannot separate blood, history, language, culture and customs from each other in order to define us, as we saw; so, what can we infer from this?
Although many Europeans in America (and even Europeans in Europe) use White to refer themselves, currently White is mostly a synonym of just white skin, without cultural and historical backgrounds (thanks to the corrupt actions of media and politics), and given the kind of melting pot that have become some places like the U.S. (e.g. where many “Mexicans” are apparently whiter, thanks to a degree of former interracial mixing with Spaniards and the fact that, with lower sunlight levels, they do not develop properly their melanin in their skins). So given the kind of media and political attack that the Europeans are receiving, using “generic terms” could be counterproductive; also the kind of stigma that White currently has (again, thanks to media and government), is hard to forget.
Apart from the fact that researching in our own origins is a truly enriching experience, identifying ourselves in more accurate terms is a more effective way of challenging the system. For example, for a complex European population like the U.S. we can infer that most of its “White” populations are Europeans, also we can infer that most are from the Germanic People given that most are from Nations of the Germanic Volk. Also most speak English or other Germanic language (like Pennsylvania High German / Pennsilfaanisch Deitsch or Mennonite Low German / Plautdietsch). Furthermore, for people of English descent, they certainly will fall within the English Nation; for many descendants of Germans, although most of them don’t speak German, they brought to the U.S. many of their traditions and customs and could classify in some degree as a mixed but predominantly German Nation, and so on.
If Mark (Brainwashed / SJW) asks Friedrich (Nationalist), both white,
Mark: What do you think about “Black lives matter”?
And Friedrich responds,
Friedrich: Well that’s fine, but you know what? German lives also matter.
And Mark, confused, would say,
Mark: What do you mean with German Lives?
And Friedrich, self-confident, answers,
Friedrich: Well I’m not just White, I am from European decent, my family comes from the German Nation, I have a great appreciation for the peoples of Europe; we, the Europeans and particularly the Germans, developed great things like science, engineering and medicine that improve the lives of people around the globe, even in Africa; and we fought against social injustice, for fair work and wages and even fought to end some forms of slavery, like the debt slavery, so I think that our lives also matter.”
And Mark, still confused but intrigued, would probably say
Mark: Well, I didn’t know that…..
What would happen if Friedrich would just say “White lives also matter, fucking niggers” to his brainwashed / SJW partner?
Proving knowledge, showing good arguments and self-confidence is probably the best way to change the political climate and convince others of the validity of our ideas.
Source Article from http://renegadetribune.com/europeans-or-whites-the-advantage-of-using-accurate-terms/
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
