My Reply to the One-Sided BBC Panorama Programme on Vaccination
Tap News / Weaver
(This is the script of Vernon Coleman’s contribution to the film `We will not be silenced’ (Ask the Experts II) which was published on 20th February 2021 by Oracle Films and Covileaks. It is Vernon’s response to a Panorama programme which was broadcast on 15th February 2021.)
My name is Vernon Coleman. I was a British GP for ten years and resigned because I refused to break patient confidentiality by putting diagnoses on sick notes. That, incidentally, was the only time I was ever disciplined. I was fined by the NHS for this and it’s something I am proud of because patient confidentiality is important to me.
The BBC’s official policy is not to allow any discussion or debate about vaccination. Instead, they accept as gospel anything the Government, the regulators and the drug companies tell them. Those who question any aspect of the Government line are banned.
This is an extraordinary state of affairs for a national broadcaster which is supposed to inform and educate its viewers and listeners and to provide a fair and accurate account of the news; and it means that those who obtain all or most of their information from the BBC are never fully informed about a topic which is, almost certainly, the most important health issue of our times.
To use a sporting metaphor it’s as though the BBC were to report on a football match between Manchester United and Liverpool but to tell its viewers and listeners only what the Liverpool players were doing and to count only the goals scored by Liverpool.
The result, of course, is propaganda. And the BBC’s policy exposes it to ridicule and contempt from independent scientists and journalists.
It is impossible to defend such a one-sided approach to informing the public.
Especially at a time when the public is desperate for accurate information.
Despite all the Government’s propaganda and advertising, around one third of the population still have serious doubts about the planned vaccination programme and there are millions who are desperately seeking solid, unbiased information upon which to base their decisions.
They won’t get that information from the BBC which steadfastly denies the evidence and follows the official ‘Gatesian’ line that the covid-19 jabs are effective and safe when the science clearly shows that they are neither.
Indeed, instead of just refusing to debate with those who question the plan to give an experimental covid-19 jab to everyone in the world, the BBC seems to do everything it can to demonise those who dare to tell the truth about the jab and, indeed, about everything else related to covid-19.
When it comes to propaganda, the BBC has form, of course.
But it’s in the area of covid-19 that the BBC’s ignorance and failure to understand research or science really becomes blatant and embarrassing. Their attempts to fact check expert claims are so poor that I fear that an infant school teacher would be embarrassed if her pupils produced such shoddy work as part of a science project. This is truly pathetic, a mark of D minus would be for getting the date right.
For example, when the BBC decided that the Government’s official line on mask wearing needed support , they ignored around 100 solid, scientific papers, interviewed a solitary advisor who said masks were essential and safe, quoted a curious WHO report that masks wouldn’t lead to hypoxia and then concluded that a whole library of scientific evidence could safely be ignored or, in their words, debunked.
If this embarrassingly childish approach to science was simply embarrassing to the BBC it wouldn’t matter much. I don’t think the BBC has much of a reputation anyway these days.
But there are, sadly, some who still believe what they hear or see or read from the BBC. And the lives of those people are in danger as a result of this grotesque parody of journalism.
By the time the covid-19 fraud has been finally condemned, I believe the BBC will have been responsible for tens of thousands of deaths.
What a long way the BBC has travelled from the stout and solid aims of Lord Reith that the organisation should educate and inform.
Like many others I’ve spent most of the last year campaigning against this fraud because I know that governments around the world are engaged in a massive conspiracy. And, for the record, my campaigning has cost me hugely in terms of reputation and finance. BBC staff are well rewarded to endorse the Government’s Gatesian line. I haven’t made one penny out of my videos or articles about this fraud. On the contrary the cost in personal and financial terms has been massive. I made a video for Brand New Tube explaining exactly how my Wikipedia page had been deliberately altered to demonise me within days of my starting this campaign in March 2020.
Anyone who says the covid-19 jab is extremely safe and completely effective is lying. There is a long list on my website of just some of those who’ve been killed or injured by what is without question an experimental jab.
Anyone who looks at my record will see that I have spent my life campaigning passionately on behalf of patients. I am not going to be bullied into silence by people who don’t understand the meaning of science or the responsibility of journalists.
As always, everything I’ve said or written is based on hundreds of scientific papers and real evidence – much of which is available on my website, free. My two recent books on the fraud are also available free on my website.
And, unlike the BBC, I don’t have any financial links with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright Vernon Coleman February 20st 2021
To watch the entire film, which is on Brand New Tube, just click here
http://www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm
Original Article: http://tapnewswire.com/2021/02/my-reply-to-the-one-sided-bbc-panorama-programme-on-vaccination/
Related posts:
Views: 0