RSS Feed
October 8th, 2023 
Awake Goy 
Charges against several individuals involved in a 2021 pandemic protest have been dropped, leaving a trail of injustice and confusion.
The corrupt organisation known as Victoria Police are in collusion with the government of Victoria, in punishing persons unlawfully under the COVID banner.
There is no lawfully issued fine or ‘Infringement Notice’, under the label of COVID or CHO’s (Chief Health Officer’s) directions.
This is across the entire colony called Australia, where in New South Wales, the so called fines have been dropped, where if they haven’t then this may become a ‘constitutional argument’ to say the least.
There are a fair few ‘questions of law’ with regards to any actions by police against the people.
- First and foremost, was the ‘State of Disaster’ declared lawfully?
A Freedom of Information request was published on the 1st of July 2021 with regards to this.
“ We provide for your oversight the Freedom of Information inquiry requesting advice the Premier received from the Minister for Police and Emergency Services so as to declare a State of Disaster on August 2nd 2020. The Department advices one should not focus on the administrative error of incorrectly dated documents and just the content of the response.
Could this document have been incorrectly dated in a haste to create something that did not exist?
The court of public opinion awaits.”
See pdf:
Source:
https://constitutionwatch.com.au/freedom-of-information-state-of-disaster-victoria/
- Was Victoria’s (alleged) Chief Health Officer Dr. Brett Andrew Sutton’s appointment lawfully enacted?
Even though this information is a ‘public document’, the government is reluctant to make this document available to the public.
- In what capacity does the CHO act, and are that person’s directions applicable to the general population?
The Chief Health Officer acts as an adviser to the state government.
There is no lawfully enacted instrument that mandates the general population to follow any directions given by the CHO.
- Did Victoria Police act under dictation from the CHO?
Yes, Victoria Police acted under dictation from Brett Sutton.
See 10 minute video:
Victoria Police initiated an unprovoked attack on persons walking back to their vehicles after an issue of a ‘move on order’.
Senior Sergeant Warren “Chappy” Chapman – 30685, committed criminal offences against the persons involved in the police ambush.
He should be removed from office, just like the police invloved with the assault of Corinna Horvath.
Ms. Horvath didn’t really obtain a ‘remedy’ from the corrupt govenrnment and police until she went international under ‘Human Rights’ in the case Horvath v Australia (HRC, 2014), from her assault by Victoria Police in 1996.
The (Victorian) government and police are so corrupt that in 2018, a serving policeman (David Laurence Jenkin) was found not guilty, in the County Court, of assaulting Ms Horvath in her own home in an ulawful raid.
Similarly, people so called remedy could be obtained from a document called “Remedies for All Australians” within this post:
Australia’s judicature, human rights abusers!
Victoria Police have provided falsified documents in order to obtain bail conditions against Mr. Nick Patterson.
Police initiated false charges that resulted in bail conidtion that were later dropped, as they were exposed to be false.
Victoria Police threaten and intimidate the accused in order to make a guilty plea, so that their falsified charges have merrit.
Any alleged recourse is only their in principle, where the reality is a far crime compared to that what is written on paper.
The government is deliberately by design ‘incompetent’ to prosecute itself.
IBAC (Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commission) is not ‘independent’ where it’s corrupt and obtains it queues from financial services institutions such as BlackRock and The Vanguard Group.
The police investigated themselves and it was found they did nothing wrong.
The Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, is subject to decisions that are financially beneficial to its ‘stakeholders’ that being the above mentioned financial services institutions as seen in the following document
where the full three page document is available within the following link:
Police deny documents that one is legally and lawfully entitled to with regards to one’s defence.
‘Justice’ depends on the size of one’s wallet, where that is (financial) decrimination of a person.
IBAC and ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption) only exist on paper to appease the general population that there is allegedly somewhere to go to ‘complain’ about police (and government) corruption.
Australia is truly a totalitarian fascist state, that would make Mussolini proud.
See also: fightcorruptpolice.com or australianpeacemakers.com and t.me/fightcorruptpolice
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
