Concordia Professor Criticizes HPV Vaccine After Winning A Federal Grant To Study It

October 17th, 2015

Awake Goy

Dr. Genevieve Rail, Professor of Critical Studies of Health at Concordia University, recently received a grant of $270,000 from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) to study the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). She concluded that there is absolutely no proof that the human papillomavirus directly causes cervical cancer.

“I’m sort of raising a red flag, out of respect for what I’ve found in my own study, and for the despair of parents who had totally perfect 12-year-olds who are now in their beds, too tired to go to school,” she said. “Yes, we’re going against the grain, and we are going against those who are believed, i.e. doctors and nurses and people in public health.” (source)

She feels there are “serious concerns” about the vaccine, yet no research on how young people “experience” the vaccine. (source)

Rial was not the only one who participated in this study; her co-author was Abby Lippman, a McGill University Professor Emeritus who has also questioned the safety and benefits of HPV vaccines. She is urging Quebec to halt HPV immunizations, like Japan has done, until its alleged dangers are independently investigated. The word independent is important there, because all of the literature that has gone into the approval of this vaccine has come straight from the vaccine manufacturers themselves. With all of the recent public disclosures about fraud with regards to medical science, this is an important consideration.

“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.” – (source)(source) Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), Harvard Professor of Medicine and Former Editor-in-Chief of The New England Medical Journal

You can read more about fraudulent medical science, and how much of it has gained a hold on modern day medicine, here.

Gardasil, also known as the HPV vaccine, is given as a series of three shots over 6 months to supposedly protect girls from developing an HPV infection which, according to some, can lead to cervical cancer.

Rail’s claims that there is no proof that HPV leads to cervical cancer is quite controversial, because a German scientist was awarded the Nobel Prize five years ago for discovering the supposed link. Eduardo Franco, head of cancer epidemiology at McGill University, states that:

“This is akin to funding research that purports to show tobacco smoking does not cause lung cancer. And that tobacco cessation, rather than helping reduce risk, is actually causing harm … CIHR would not fund such a study, would it?” (source)

No doubt, mainstream media outlets and many scientists will probably continue to slam professor Rail, but perhaps that’s because they are simply unaware of certain information that doesn’t really get publicized. It’s difficult to understand how anyone can dismiss these concerns outright when there have been multiple cases of brain inflammation, multiple sclerosis, and even deaths after girls have received this vaccine.

We have scientists like Franco making comments like that, and then other experts making comments like this:

“It is a vaccine that’s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the dangers are underestimated.” – (Taken from the One More Girl Documentary) – Dr. Chris Shaw, Professor at the University of British Columbia in the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Visual Sciences

Again, it’s hard to believe that Franco would make such a remark, comparing Rail’s comments about the vaccine to the relationship between smoking and lung cancer, if he were looking seriously at research from the other side of the argument.

For example, if we take a look at Dr. Diane Harper, one of a select few specialists in OB/GYN (in the world) who helped design and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved (she has also authored many published papers about it), we will see that she has also condemned the vaccine. She has stated that the HPV vaccine is neither safe nor effective. She has mentioned that the tested length of the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing HPV infection is not long enough to prevent cervical cancer, which, as she states in the video below, can take decades to develop. She has also stated that vaccination will not decrease the number of cervical cancer cases, but a routine of regular pap smears will.

She was also a paid speaker and consultant to Merck before speaking out.

Here’s what she has to say about the subject:

Here is a video from Dr. Lucija Tomlijenovic, PhD, from the Neural Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Opthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, speaking about the HPV vaccine.

It’s also worth mentioning here that Dr. Bernard Dalbergue, a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer, Merck, is also raising his voice against the HPV vaccine, along with the pharmaceutical industry as a whole. He joins a long list of experts from within the industry who have slammed the rampant manipulation and control of clinical research done by the pharmaceutical industry.

This quote is taken from an interview that happened in April of 2014, from an issue of the French magazine Principes de Santé (Health Principles):

The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed: everyone knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be worthless. Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it all. I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. Gardasil is useless and costs a fortune! In addition, decision-makers at all levels are aware of it! Cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced encephalitis can be found, whatever the vaccine. (source) – Dr. Bernard Dalbergue

More Considerations When It Comes To The HPV Vaccine

Another factor to consider here is that Gardasil is loaded with aluminum — even more aluminum than other commonly administered vaccines.

Why is this concerning? Because, despite the fact that aluminum has been added to vaccines for approximately 90 years, many people still don’t know that that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and vaccine manufacturers themselves have not conducted or included any appropriate toxicity studies proving the safety of aluminum, or any other vaccine ingredients, for that matter. These ingredients have been put into vaccines based on the assumption that they are safe. Yes, you read that correctly. It’s kind of disturbing, isn’t it? You would think that before putting aluminum into a vaccine, or indeed anything else, that there would be, at least, some safety assessments being done which include appropriate toxicity studies/testing.

Research is continuing to emerge every single year outlining the concerns of aluminum and other vaccine ingredients.

For example:

Here is one study, published in 2015, that outlines several concerns about these vaccine ingredients.

A study published in the Journal of Toxicology in 2014 by scientists from the University of British Colombia, Louisiana, and MIT, outlines how up until the 1820s — when the industrial extraction of AI made it possible to bring it into our food, manufacturing, medicines, and more — aluminum was almost completely absent from the biosphere. The paper outlines how aluminum is harmful to the Central Nervous System (CNS), “acting in a number of deleterious ways and across multiple levels to induce biosemiotic entropy.” (source)

Below is a video of one of the authors of the above cited study explaining why aluminum (when injected) is of concern:

Here is a great video by Dr. Christopher Exley, Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University and Honorary Professor at UHI Millennium Institute. He is known as one of the world’s leading experts on aluminum toxicity.

A study published by in the Journal Current Medical Chemistry in 2011 also stated that:

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. (source)

The study goes on to mention that:

The issue of vaccine safety thus becomes even more pertinent given that, to the best of our knowledge, no adequate clinical studies have been conducted to establish the safety of concomitant administration of two experimentally-established neurotoxins, aluminum and mercury, the latter in the form of ethyl mercury (thimerosal) in infants and children. Since these molecules negatively affect many of the same biochemical processes and enzymes implicated in the etiology of autism, the potential for a synergistic toxic action is plausible [31, 47]. Additionally, for the purpose of evaluating safety and efficacy, vaccine clinical trials often use an aluminium-containing placebo, either containing the same or greater amount of aluminum as the test vaccine [48-51]. Without exception, these trials report a comparable rate of adverse reactions between the placebo and the vaccine group (for example, 63.7% vs 65.3% of systemic events and 1.7% vs 1.8% of serious adverse events respectively [51]).

Shaw and Seneff (an MIT professor) also recently published a paper (2013) in the journal Immunome Research outlining a lot of evidence pointing to the dangers regarding aluminum in vaccines. (source)

And a fairly recent Meta-Analysis published in the journal Bio Med Research International found that:

The studies upon which the CDC relies and over which it exerted some level of control report that there is no increased risk of autism from exposure to organic Hg in vaccines, and some of these studies even reported that exposure to Thimerosal appeared to decrease the risk of autism. These six studies are in sharp contrast to research conducted by independent researchers over the past 75+ years that have consistently found Thimerosal to be harmful. As mentioned in the Introduction section, many studies conducted by independent investigators have found Thimerosal to be associated with neurodevelopment disorders…. Considering that there are many studies conducted by independent researchers which show a relationship between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders, the results of the six studies examined in this review, particularly those showing the protective effects of Thimerosal, should bring into question the validity of the methodology used in the studies. (source)

The list literally goes on and on. I chose the studies above, and commonly do with my vaccine articles, because they are the most recent. But I want to make clear that there is study after study from various scientists stationed in multiple countries that have raised these concerns. For any scientist to completely condemn the questioning of the HPV vaccine is irresponsible, and to make those who do look like they are the ‘lone wolf’ is absolutely ridiculous.

This is why it’s so important to let people know that yes, there actually is another side to the coin. This is precisely why billions of dollars have been paid to families with vaccine injured children.

Related CE article that goes into greater detail as to why more parents are choosing not to vaccinate their children:

The Top 6 Reasons Why Parents Are Choosing Not To Vaccinate Their Children.