RSS Feed
July 2nd, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda
July 2, 2012
Circumcision is a needless operation
that traumatizes and maims male babies.
(Editor’s Note: I do not endorse the information or conclusions presented here, but post for discussion purposes. I think anything that decreases male sex drive is a positive.)
by David Richards
(henrymakow.com)
The World Health
Organization estimates that 30% of men across the world have been
snipped. Circumcision is part of the religious tradition of Muslims and
Jews.
In the West, most commonly in America, many Christians and
secularists circumcise for health reasons. However, the American Association of Pediatrics says there is no evidence that circumcision improves penile hygiene. (Urine is sterile and the foreskin can be easily retracted and cleaned.)
Cir Traumatizes Baby Boys
A University of Michigan Study found that circumcision causes excruciating pain that lasts days (the operation is performed without anesthetic!). Some boys cry so much that they cannot breathe and turn blue due to lack of oxygen. One baby cried so much he ruptured his stomach.
After the operation, the boys nurse poorly and do not bond normally with their mothers. Some psychologists speculate that the trauma of circumcision may stay with a man into adulthood, existing as ‘a feeling of anger he cannot place.’
Sexual Problems
Circumcision causes a true loss of sensation. Canadian pathologist Dr John Taylor and his team found that the foreskin contains specialized nerve endings comparable to those in fingertips and lips.
‘Whereas the foreskin is loaded with nerves, the head of the denuded penis is a blunt instrument, insensitive to light, touch, heat, cold, and, as far as the authors are aware, to pinprick”
Medical researcher Tina Kimmel found that the penile sensitivity of intact males is 25 percent to 30 percent greater than that of circumcised males.
The foreskin also acts as a mechanical lubricant during sex. The penis is not designed to slide in and out of a woman, but in and out of its own skin during sex. Without a foreskin, a man has to build friction to feel pleasure.
Many circumcised men have voiced their struggle to achieve sexual satisfaction.
Here are some comments I found online. A man who got circumcised ‘out of curiosity’:
“Getting circumcised was the most foolish thing I’ve done in my life… I was quite sexually active before marriage, and had a pretty normal sex life after marriage for two years before my reduction. Now I am essentially only interested in oral sex, as vaginal sex does not provide the detailed sensations that it did when I had a foreskin. The analogy of “seeing without color” is perfectly apt to describe sex without a foreskin. Rather than being a touch-sensitive organ, it becomes merely a pressure-sensitive tool. Big difference!”
A promiscuous gay man:
“I have a lot of insight about this subject… Over the years I have noticed that uncircumcised men plainly have more intense pleasure (I see it as uncontrollable and very intense), erections and last much longer and with much less stimulation. Circumcised men always need to be stimulated or they lose the feeling of pleasure.”
I have often wondered why all male porn stars are circumcised. Are they snipped purposely to reduce sensitivity? Does it help them have sex for hours without ejaculating?
The Effect on Women
Circumcision can also hinder a woman’s sex life. Firstly, the friction a circumcised man needs to build can cause her pain.
Secondly, circumcised men get less satisfaction form typical sex and require ‘compensatory sex’, such as oral sex and the use of lotions. Many women may resent giving these services and feel demoralized that their partner cannot reach satisfaction through normal sex. As the saying goes ‘sex is between the ears’; if a woman feels the man isn’t enjoying it, neither will she.
Here are some comments I found online by women. A 44-year-old woman who experienced her first uncircumcised penis later in life:
“I discovered that since the penis goes in and out of its own skin, the vagina does not get sore from frequent sex. It is a much smoother process. I have had times when I was having frequent sex and got so sore and raw from the common circumcised penis I had to sit in a hot bathtub, and then smear cortisone cream on my vulva. With a ‘ragtop’ that does not happen.
I never performed oral sex on an uncut guy and they never seemed to want it. I assume they were getting enough stimulation from regular vaginal sex.”
Another ‘experienced’ woman:
“Circumcision can harm sexual relations. If you’ve ever had sex with both a circed and an uncirced man, you’d know. Some women say that it doesn’t make a difference, but I know that it definitely did for me. (Think “ribbed for her pleasure”.)
When you rub the (uncircumcised) penis with your hand, the foreskin makes it “glide” up and down easier. Sex is better, too, for the same reason – the foreskin helps it slide in and out better.”
Historical Background
It has been known for centuries that circumcision damages healthy sexual behavior.
Circumcision was introduced into Western culture by puritanical Victorian elites hell-bent on reducing sexual activity.
In her 1978 paper The Ritual of Circumcision Karen Paige wrote:
“The original reason for the surgical removal of the foreskin was to control ‘masturbatory insanity’ – the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the ‘polluting’ practice of ‘self-abuse.'”
Writing in the Australian medical Journal, Robert Darby provides some background:
“In the 19th century the role of the foreskin in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to masturbation.
The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814-1875) damned it as “a source of serious mischief”, and most of his contemporaries concurred.
William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that “circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse”, and both he and Acton considered the foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age.
Jonathan Hutchinson, English surgeon and pathologist (1828-1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.”
At the same time, female circumcision (removal of the clitoris) was also practiced on women to ‘treat’ female masturbators.
Can the foreskin be replaced?
It is possible to restore the foreskin. This involves steady extension of the shaft skin, allowing the man to recover some of the functions of the foreskin.
Restoration involves tugging or stretching the skin using elastics or weights.
One man who is 2 years into an on-off restoration attempt reports:
“I can definitely report differences! During sex, the dominant sensation is no longer friction, but the tension of the skin being pulled in and out… an additional pleasurable and very different sensation entirely absent before restoration. It’s hard to describe, but I must say it was well worth the time and effort put into restoration!”
Conclusion
The foreskin is an essential part of a functioning penis.
The removal of the foreskin causes great trauma to a newborn baby and may cause him serious sexual problems in the future.
Given the negative effects of circumcision, what justification is there to continue the practice?
——-
Cir trauma babies – http://www.circumcision.org/response.htm
Info on the loss of sensation – http://www.babyhealth.co.za/circumcision.html
The personal accounts http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/sex-cut-uncut.htm
Karen Paige ‘The Ritual of Circumcision’ http://www.noharmm.org/paige.htm
Historical background on ‘circumcision as a
way to stop masturbation’ –http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_to_prevent_masturbation
—
First Comment from Lulu
As followers of Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam), we
emulate the actions of our prophets, since they are the ones who have
set the examples for the rest of us to follow when it came to worshiping
God and following His commands. To speculate otherwise will lead us
away from the true way we are meant to live and thrive as God’s
creations.
Aside from being practiced by God’s true believers, circumcision is a
tradition that has been passed down by our forefathers and that has
many benefits that continue to reinforce its validity, most notably
where health and hygiene is concerned.
The foreskin is a warm and moist incubator
under which infections can easily develop, and removing it not minimizes
the accumulation of smegma, which is a trap for bacterium buildup, but
circumcised penises are known to help prevent the transmission of
sexually transmitted diseases, and significantly reduces the risk of acquiring and transmitting the HIV virus.
Cancer of the cervix in women is due to the Human Papilloma
Virus. It thrives under and on the foreskin from where it can
be transmitted during intercourse. An article in the British
Medical Journal in April 2002 suggested that at least 20%
of cancer of the cervix would be avoided if all men were circumcised.
Surely that alone makes it worth doing!
There is some evidence that circumcision has health benefits, including:
- A decreased risk of urinary tract infections.
- A reduced risk of sexually transmitted diseases in men (and women).
- Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners.
- Prevention of balanitis (inflammation of the glans) and balanoposthitis (inflammation of the glans and foreskin).
- Prevention
of phimosis (the inability to retract the foreskin) and paraphimosis
(the inability to return the foreskin to its original location).
As for sexual pleasure, my husband, who is circumcised, has had no problems in that area and is definitely NOT “maimed”. Also, let me tell you men a little secret: most of us women prefer the way a circumcised penis looks.
Some communist-minded residents of San Francisco tried to ban
circumcision last year, claiming it is traumatic for the baby and an
infringement on its rights (same arguments the Germans are making now,
with their recent circumcision ban). This is merely yet another attempt
to pry a wedge between parents and their children. NO ONE will love and
care for a child more than its own parents, and parents have the responsibility to make decisions on
behalf of their child – like the big decisions about vaccinations,
knowing that for long term benefit to the child and others, the
pain of the injection and often the fever which follows are worthwhile.
As
one who follows the traditions all our prophets have left for us, I
plan on having my husband arrange the circumcision of our sons. I will
not let atheistic humans try to convince me that their ways are better
than what God and His prophets have laid out for us. Humans have been
circumcising and procreating and enjoying sex for millennia with no issue
at all… why is it just a problem now?!! Something to think about!
••••••••••
Comments for “Circumcision Should be Stopped”
John said (July 2, 2012):
Circumcision was the old covenant. Christ Jesus fulfilled the old covenant, God’s laws, prophesies, etc. and, by doing so, Christ Jesus ushered in the new covenant, which is baptism. Baptism is exclusive neither to men nor to Jew, as the old covenant, because God desires salvation for all people of all nations.
Parenthetically, I think that is why the Jews loathe God, especially Christ Jesus, so much because He brought in a new covenant for all people of all nations, thus the Jews can no longer boast for being “chosen people.” Circumcision was the old covenant (restricted to men and to Jew) whereas baptism is the new covenant (men, women, Jew, Gentile–basically all people of all nations). Therefore, circumcision is no longer necessary and thus ought to be stopped.
Al Thompson said (July 2, 2012):
This procedure is something that I always believed in but now I’m having second thoughts over it; especially after knowing more about the Talmudic Jews and Zionism. I have no problem with believing that God may not have given this commandment. Just like any writing, one must try to discern the truth. Would God really make a foreskin only to be cut off after 8 days? To me, this commandment doesn’t make any sense. Now, if God really said it, then I would have no problem with the procedure, but I suspect this may be some nonsense from Talmudic Jews or Pharisees. There’s no way I can prove it but I wouldn’t be surprised.
In my view, a commandment has to make common sense: “Thou shalt not kill…” This is easily understood. Cutting off the foreskin of a baby who has no say in the matter; well, that has the footprint of a real psycho. If it is true that the Talmudic Jews engage in child abuse, then circumcision seems to be a part of that. Given the fact that the Bible has been tampered with for centuries, it wouldn’t surprise me that it was added in for whatever perverted reason. I personally have a hard time believing that God requires something like this.
So, I’m thinking that this was something that came somewhere other than God. If I had it to do over again, I wouldn’t circumcise my sons.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2011/10/to-circumcise-or-not-to-circumcise.html
Henry Makow is the author of A Long Way to go for a Date. He received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto. He welcomes your feedback and ideas at
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
