Hague condemned what he described as the Syrian government’s plan to launch a “full-scale land assault on the people of Homs” claiming the Syrian forces are fighting Syrian citizens.
“I urge it to stop any such plans and instead allow immediate and unhindered access to the humanitarian agencies who are ready to deliver vital assistance to those affected by the violence in all parts of the city,” he added.
Hague’s comments are especially alarming considering reports that Britain and its western and regional allies are behind the anti-government violence in Homs and other cities.
Disclosures of links between Syrian human rights devotees, who have been fanning the flames of conflict in the Middle Eastern country and the British government further darken the picture.
Revelations over the past weeks show Britain has led arms deliveries and tactical support to Syrian rebels, engaged in bloody battles in Homs, while also feeding them with intelligence to help intensify their campaign of violence.
The disclosures showed Britain and qatar have four operation centers in Homs with their ground troops already active, there, to set the stage for toppling of president Bashar Assad’s government.
The violence in Homs has continued over the days following the Sunday referendum in Syria that saw 89.4 percent of people vote in favor of the government’s proposed new constitution.
While western officials have used the continuing violence as an excuse to condemn the plebiscite as phony, Syrians’ clear majority response to the proposed reforms intensify fears that western-backed militia rather than Syrian people are fighting the Assad government in Homs.
Hague’s call on the Syrian government to allow “humanitarian agencies” in the country is reminiscent of the situation in Libya and its affinities with the anti-Syrian propaganda by Britain and its friends.
London and its allies made the case for an attack on Libya based on human rights reports, arguing they had a “responsibility to protect” civilians.
Later, however, a documentary by Jlien Teil named “Humanitarian War in Libya: There Is No Evidence”, uncovered the fact that all the bulk of evidence used by the International Criminal Court and the United Nations to allow Britain and its allies to go after regime change in Libya were fabricated and baseless.
Recent developments have uncovered a similar “humanitarian” guise for entirely political aims behind London’s stance on Syria.
Reuters published a photo of Rami Abdelrahman, the head of the Syrian Observatory on Human Rights, on November 21, 2011 that showed him leaving the Foreign and Commonwealth Office after meeting British Foreign Secretary William Hague.
The observatory is an exclusive source of allegations that the Assad government forces are killing Syrian protestors.
The Foreign Office has not revealed the nature of Abdelrahman’s meeting with Hague amid speculations that the visit was a policy coordination session to set the stage for more unjustified pressure on Assad government.
Hague’s call for humanitarian and political intervention in Syria further strengthens speculations that “responsibility to protect” turns to ‘will to occupy’ as was the case in Libya.
AMR/HE
Views: 0