Jew World Order

With patent litigation fast turning into the tech industry’s favourite pastime, the year-long legal battle between Apple and Samsung that began last April now extends to more than 10 countries around the world, and at least 50 initial filings.

Patent blogger Florian Mueller, who, thankfully, tracks this stuff closely so that the rest of us don’t have to risk having our brains explode, has done his usual first-rate job of compiling a list sorting out the venues of this “massively escalated, planet-spanning dispute”. Amazingly, he noted, the number of legal filings might even climb higher. As Mueller notes in his latest post:

After an initial filing, lawsuits can be consolidated (which effectively happened to the first two lawsuits the parties filed against each other in California), or, which happened far more frequently, split up into multiple lawsuits by the courts. For example, German courts usually look at only one patent per litigation, and sometimes assign more than one case number per patent if there’s a delay with serving the complaint on one of two or more defendants. Also, these parties tend to appeal each and every decision, and the list below doesn’t contain cases before appeals courts.

Of course, there’s always the possibility that these two might be able to work out a deal. During a conference call last week to discuss the company’s quarterly earnings, Apple CEO Tim Cook offered a general statement of his desire to end the litigation that has engulfed much of the wireless industry, without mentioning Samsung specifically.

“I would highly prefer to settle than to battle,” he said. “But it’s important that Apple not become the developer for the world. We need people to invent their own stuff.”

Both Cook and his opposite number at Samsung, along with their top lawyers, are supposed to give settlement talks a shot in front of a judge in San Francisco on 21 and 22 May.

This long-running legal confrontation began in April 2011, when Apple filed a lawsuit in California accusing Samsung of copying “the look and feel” of its iPad tablet and iPhone smartphone. “Rather than innovate and develop its own technology and a unique Samsung style for its smartphone products and computer tablets, Samsung chose to copy Apple’s technology, user interface and innovative style in these infringing products,” Apple complained.

Samsung quickly responded with a countersuit against Apple, taking the fight overseas to South Korea, Japan and Germany. Ever since, it’s been a veritable full-time employment act for the lawyers.

The case is still playing itself out here in Australia, as the two parties continue to duke it out over the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet and Apple’s range of mobile devices. The local case has already seen a tussle over the Samsung tablet, with a ban implemented on the device in October last year before it was ultimately overturned by the High Court in December.

Luke Hopewell also contributed to this report.

Via CNET