Analysis of evidence in the “targeted” killings of Barry & Honey Sherman concludes murders were politically motivated, who the prime suspects are & why.

July 20th, 2020

Awake Goy

Posted by Paul W Kincaid
World news
Tuesday, March 31st, 2020

What was the primary motive for the break in & targeted murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? To answer that one must first examine why lead Toronto police investigator, Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes publicly stated that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed? “I believe they were targeted,” The word “targeted” was specifically chosen to describe Toronto’s 2017 homicides #64 and #65. What was Det.-Sgt. Susan Gomes revealing to the public by calling the double homicides “targeted” killing?

Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. That’s what Toronto Police were telling Canadians when they said Barry & Honey Sherman were “targeted” & killed. Toronto Police stated publicly from the very beginning that “there was no sign of forced entry into their home”. That is referred to as surreptitious entry. Toronto Police publicly stating that the murderers entered the home of Barry and Honey Sherman via surreptitious entry is of major significance. It supports the discovery finding that the Shermans were targeted and killed by a “government authority”.

Evidence of markings being found on the wrists of both Barry and Honey Sherman, indicated they had been tied up, yet no ties or ropes were found at the scene. This too has major significance in that it confirms both Barry and Honey were restrained, forcibly detained (were handcuffed) before being killed. Both being forcibly restrained, leaving marks, provides evidence it wasn’t a murder suicide. No ties or ropes were found at the scene proves the killers took the “restraints” (handcuffs) with them.

Restraint markings on their wrists, the Toronto Police Services stating that the Shermans were targeted and killed and that their murderers gained access via surreptitious entry all lead to the conclusion that Barry and Honey Sherman were targeted and killed by police officers. Which police officers? RCMP. Why?

1) Targeted killing is defined as an assassination by a “government authority” of an individual(s) for a perceived threat. A RCMP officer is a government authority. They are authorized by the federal government to uphold and enforce government enacted and imposed laws across Canada.

2) RCMP officers contend that they are authorized by government appointed adjudicators to enter private premises to install listening or video devices or recover evidence in support of “an ongoing criminal investigation”. The power so granted authorizing surreptitious entry allows the RCMP to utilize whatever means to achieve entry they found most expedient. Thus, access could be obtained by forcing doors or windows or via Realtor lock box, or simply through trickery or coercion. Further, if RCMP officers acting under Part IV.1 are implicitly authorized to make entry, s. 25 of the Code would permit them “to effect such entry by overcoming force” a property owner is normally entitled to assert, to prevent anyone, including the police, from entering the premises without permission.

At the time of the targeted murders, the RCMP were conducting a criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 election candidate Justin Trudeau. The RCMP investigation was commenced using Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) tape recorded interview with Barry Sherman on Nov 3, 2016. During the tape recorded conversation, Mr Sherman openly discussed a fundraiser held at his house on August 26, 2015, which featured then-Liberal candidate Michael Levitt, now an MP, along with Trudeau. Because OCL launched an RCMP investigation of the August 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau based on the content of the tape recorded Nov 3, 2016 interview Apotex filed a law suit seeking a transcript of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying interview with lobbyist Barry Sherman, or a copy of the recording. Justin Trudeau responded by paying the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying $400,000 to obstruct/defeat Barry Sherman suit & a court hearing that was to be held Feb 2018 to address OCL refusing to comply with a chief court clerk order that “redacted” documents that detail the taped interview between OCL & Barry Sherman must be uncensored & handed over to Apotex. The chief court clerk order was made as a result of the Commissioner of Lobbying redacting Justin Trudeau name from material evidence in an ongoing RCMP investigation. Complying with Chief court clerk order would prove OCL REDACTED Justin Trudeau name from the transcript in order to conceal OCL finding that Justin Trudeau broke the law: “There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (REDACTED) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s” Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser.

In a previous email to Brian H. Greenspan I provided evidence that the Sherman’s home was under surveillance by the RCMP. Only the RCMP has jurisdiction (government authority) to conduct a criminal investigation for the Federal government’s Office of Commissioner of Lobbying. Direct quote from Administering the Lobbying Act (December 2011) https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/eic/site/012.nsf/eng/h_00436.html:

“The peace officer having jurisdiction to investigate the matter, generally the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in the case of the Lobbying Act, will consider the case in consultation with legal counsel at the Department of Justice and federal prosecutors at the Department of Public Prosecutions. Together, they will determine whether or not to lay charges.”

Since the RCMP criminal investigation involved a high profile government of Canada official the RCMP claim that they are authorized to make surreptitious entry (via the Realtor lock box), or simply through trickery or coercion. RCMP officers also claim that they are permitted “to effect such entry by overcoming force a property owner”.

3) In Eccles v. Bourque, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, it was contended that s. 25(1) of the Criminal Code authorized trespass by the police in order to effect an arrest. The basis is that the police (RCMP) are entitled, in limited circumstances, to enter private property without consent to effect an arrest – detain a person.

People detained or arrested by police officers are usually forcibly restrained using handcuffs, either metal or plastic. A traditional form of plastic handcuffs are cable ties. Cable ties leave unique marks on wrists of those being arrested by police (RCMP). Forensic pathologist confirmed that the markings on the wrists of both Shermans, indicates they had been restrained (forcibly detained) with ties before they were murdered. Toronto Police confirmed Barry and Honey Sherman’s murderers took the restraints with them. Why would the restraints be removed from the wrists of the victims and from the crime scene? Restraints are material evidence that could be traced back to the murderers. Canadian police forces have and use a specific type of cable tie. The markings on the wrists of Barry and Honey Sherman can be matched with impressions made by any specific type of tie mfg today.

Crime scene evidence clearly leads to the conclusion that Barry & Honey Sherman were murdered by police officers. Both had restraint marks on their wrists (were handcuffed) & Honey Sherman had cuts on her lip & nose, suggesting that she had struggled with assailants & was forced face down on pool tile. The evidence is telling us that at some point Honey Sherman sensed that the intruders were going to kill her and out a fear for her life she put up a fight. The cuts on her lip & nose is telling us she was forced to the ground by a police officer(s) who used his or her knee to forcibly hold Honey Sherman’s head and face to the ground as they handcuffed Honey Sherman’s hands behind her back.

4) Crime scene evidence from Barry & Honey Sherman murders also leads to the conclusion that the motive for the surreptitious entry (break in) and murders was to recover computers and electronic devices and their data or documents: computer data and emails, material evidence that could have been used to indict and convict Justin Trudeau of corrupt practices under Canada Elections Act and as a result of such conviction would be barred from campaigning in 2019 Federal election.

What kind of computer and electronic devices data could be used to indict and convict Justin Trudeau? Guest list & Aug. 6, 2015 email invitations to Barry & Honey Sherman’s Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser soliciting financial support for Justin Trudeau. Fundraiser ledgers recording names of Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser donors, the amount of the donations and the payee’s name. If donations were made payable to the Trudeau Foundation or to Justin Trudeau the donations would be illegal. Only donations payable to the Liberal Party of Canada were legal donations.

What other kind of computer and electronic devices (smart phones and tablets) data could put Justin Trudeau in legal jeopardy because it could have been used in RCMP investigation of the Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser? Email correspondence between the Shermans and the RCMP investigating the Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser for Justin Trudeau. Email correspondence between the Shermans and the Lobbying Commissioner. Email correspondence between the Shermans and invited guests. And email correspondence between the Shermans and Justin Trudeau, before (while campaigning in 2015 election) and after becoming Prime Minister of Canada. Electronic data that could incriminate Justin Trudeau, who we all know was convicted 5 days after Barry and Honey Sherman bodies were found, of violating Conflict of Interest laws December 20, 2017. Another indictment and conviction at that time or soon after would no doubt end Justin Trudeau’s political tenure as Prime Minister.

5) The pool side murders suggests Barry & Honey Sherman were tortured: restrained (wrist marks), threatened with drowning (pool water) & beaten, before being murdered. Torture is almost always committed by person(s) acting in an official capacity, as government agents.

“Torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.” Article 1 of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Conclusion:

What was the motive for surreptitious entry, torture & murders of Barry & Honey Sherman? Why were Barry and Honey Sherman targeted and killed? Material evidence leads to the conclusion that they were targeted and killed because of the RCMP’s ongoing high profile criminal investigation of Barry and Honey Sherman’s August 26, 2015 fundraiser for 2015 “election candidate” Justin Trudeau. Surreptitious entry (break in) and torture were used to recover or destroy computer, laptop, smart phones or tablets containing incriminating files: correspondence, guest list & Aug. 6 2015 email invitations relating to Barry & Honey Sherman’s Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser soliciting large financial (money) support for Justin Trudeau.

The surreptitious entry, torture & murders of Barry & Honey Sherman resulted in the RCMP investigation of the Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser for “election candidate” Justin Trudeau being dropped. An investigation that was only launched after the Office of Commissioner of Lobbying (OCL) found evidence that Justin Trudeau broke Federal law attending (thereby accepting) Barry and Honey Sherman’s Aug. 26, 2015 fundraiser (benefit): “There is basis to conclude that the private interests of (Justin Trudeau) were advanced to a high degree, & that a sense of obligation was created by Mr. Sherman’s” Aug 26, 2015 fundraiser.

There is only 1 group of people who had motive, means & opportunity to “surreptitiously enter” (break in) Barry & Honey Sherman’s home, forcibly detain/restrain them, torture them to recover or destroy material evidence that could be used to convict Justin Trudeau & to murder them – the RCMP.

Only the RCMP (members of the Justin Trudeau’s RCMP Protective Service) had the motive, means and opportunity to surreptitious enter, torture & murder Barry & Honey Sherman and after committing such a heinous crime, undermine the Toronto Police Services investigation of the targeted murders of Barry and Honey Sherman.