RSS Feed
July 18th, 2012 
FAKE NEWS for the Zionist agenda 
“Complete disarmament” of the American people!… Paul Joseph Watson – Video
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a
flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is
determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum
which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete
disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.
The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a
plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including
small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.
Former
US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement
“is
trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international
arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real
agenda here is domestic firearms control.”
A letter sent last month
by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the
treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental,
individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that
“…the
U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose
significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and
economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”
Using the
rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international
crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are
somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should
therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.
This is
precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department
briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for
General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.”
Invoking the
threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a
“United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the
disarmament process proceeds.”
While the document initially focuses
on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only
groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing
authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN
“peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.”
“The
manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed
types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those
required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be
destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document.
While
the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national
sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the
planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a
stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the
abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.
As
Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama
administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive
administrations have tried but failed to accomplish — taking a huge
bite out of the second amendment — is by no means far fetched.
After
all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have
already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to
decide its own laws.
The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and
conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and
handed to the United Nations.
Paul Joseph Watson – July 16, 2012 – InfoWars
digg
muti
del.icio.us
google
reddit
facebook
Related posts:
Views: 0
Posted in 
Tags: 
